Cargando…
Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely to assess and address depressive symptoms and diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, CI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054650 |
_version_ | 1784713732839964672 |
---|---|
author | McMorrow, Rita Hunter, Barbara Hendrieckx, Christel Kwasnicka, Dominika Speight, Jane Cussen, Leanne Ho, Felicia Ching Siew Emery, Jon Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne |
author_facet | McMorrow, Rita Hunter, Barbara Hendrieckx, Christel Kwasnicka, Dominika Speight, Jane Cussen, Leanne Ho, Felicia Ching Siew Emery, Jon Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne |
author_sort | McMorrow, Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely to assess and address depressive symptoms and diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies including adults with type 2 diabetes, published in English, from the inception of the databases to 24 February 2022 inclusive; and where the intervention included completion of a PROM of depressive symptoms and/or diabetes distress, with feedback of the responses to a healthcare professional. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using Covidence software, screening and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: The search identified 4512 citations, of which 163 full-text citations were assessed for eligibility, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies involved assessment of depressive symptoms only, two studies assessed diabetes distress only, and two studies assessed both. All studies had an associated cointervention. When depressive symptoms were assessed (n=7), a statistically significant between-group difference in depressive symptoms was observed in five studies; with a clinically significant (>0.5%) between-group difference in HbA1c in two studies. When diabetes distress was assessed (n=4), one study demonstrated statistically significant difference in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress; with a clinically significant between-group difference in HbA1c observed in two studies. CONCLUSION: Studies are sparse in which PROMs are used to assess and address depressive symptoms or diabetes distress during routine clinical care of adults with type 2 diabetes. Further research is warranted to understand how to integrate PROMs into clinical care efficiently and determine appropriate interventions to manage identified problem areas. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020200246. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9134162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91341622022-06-10 Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review McMorrow, Rita Hunter, Barbara Hendrieckx, Christel Kwasnicka, Dominika Speight, Jane Cussen, Leanne Ho, Felicia Ching Siew Emery, Jon Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely to assess and address depressive symptoms and diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies including adults with type 2 diabetes, published in English, from the inception of the databases to 24 February 2022 inclusive; and where the intervention included completion of a PROM of depressive symptoms and/or diabetes distress, with feedback of the responses to a healthcare professional. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using Covidence software, screening and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: The search identified 4512 citations, of which 163 full-text citations were assessed for eligibility, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies involved assessment of depressive symptoms only, two studies assessed diabetes distress only, and two studies assessed both. All studies had an associated cointervention. When depressive symptoms were assessed (n=7), a statistically significant between-group difference in depressive symptoms was observed in five studies; with a clinically significant (>0.5%) between-group difference in HbA1c in two studies. When diabetes distress was assessed (n=4), one study demonstrated statistically significant difference in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress; with a clinically significant between-group difference in HbA1c observed in two studies. CONCLUSION: Studies are sparse in which PROMs are used to assess and address depressive symptoms or diabetes distress during routine clinical care of adults with type 2 diabetes. Further research is warranted to understand how to integrate PROMs into clinical care efficiently and determine appropriate interventions to manage identified problem areas. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020200246. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9134162/ /pubmed/35613752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054650 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology McMorrow, Rita Hunter, Barbara Hendrieckx, Christel Kwasnicka, Dominika Speight, Jane Cussen, Leanne Ho, Felicia Ching Siew Emery, Jon Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title | Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title_full | Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title_short | Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
title_sort | effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmorrowrita effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT hunterbarbara effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT hendrieckxchristel effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT kwasnickadominika effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT speightjane effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT cussenleanne effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT hofeliciachingsiew effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT emeryjon effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview AT manskinankervisjoanne effectofroutinelyassessingandaddressingdepressionanddiabetesdistressonclinicaloutcomesamongadultswithtype2diabetesasystematicreview |