Cargando…
The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7 |
_version_ | 1784713794877915136 |
---|---|
author | Arthuis, Chloé LeGoff, Juliette Olivier, Marion Coutin, Anne-Sophie Banaskiewicz, Nathalie Gillard, Philippe Legendre, Guillaume Winer, Norbert |
author_facet | Arthuis, Chloé LeGoff, Juliette Olivier, Marion Coutin, Anne-Sophie Banaskiewicz, Nathalie Gillard, Philippe Legendre, Guillaume Winer, Norbert |
author_sort | Arthuis, Chloé |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHODS/DESIGN: This study was a multicenter, prospective cohort, conducted in 23 French maternity units constituting one perinatal network, in 2019. All adult women who understood French and gave birth between February 1 and September 27, 2019, were eligible. The exclusion criterion was the woman's objection to participation. Validated self-administered questionnaire (QACE) was sent by email 6 weeks after the child's birth. The main outcome was the experience of childbirth, assessed on a scale of 0 to 10. A good experience was defined by a score ≥ 8/10, and a poor experience by a score < 5. A multinomial logistic regression model, expressed by cumulative proportional odds ratios, were used to determine the factors that might have affected women's experiences during childbirth. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-fifth women completed the questionnaire, for a participation rate of 49.6%. Overall, 70.7% (n = 1501/2121) of the women reported a good experience, including 38% (n = 807/2121) who graded their experience with the maximum score of 10. On the other hand, 7.3% (n = 156) of the women reported a poor experience. Vaginal delivery (aOR 3.93, 95%CI, 3.04–5.08) and satisfactory management (aOR 11.35 (7.69–16.75)) were the principal determining factors of a positive experience. Epidural analgesia increased the feeling of failure (aOR 5.64, 95%CI, 2.75–13.66). Receiving information and being asked for and agreeing to consent improved the global experience (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The Identikit picture of the woman associated with a poor experience of childbirth shows a nullipara who had a complication during her pregnancy, gave birth after induction of labor, or by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery, with the newborn transferred for pediatric care, and medical management considered unsatisfactory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9134581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91345812022-05-27 The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network Arthuis, Chloé LeGoff, Juliette Olivier, Marion Coutin, Anne-Sophie Banaskiewicz, Nathalie Gillard, Philippe Legendre, Guillaume Winer, Norbert BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHODS/DESIGN: This study was a multicenter, prospective cohort, conducted in 23 French maternity units constituting one perinatal network, in 2019. All adult women who understood French and gave birth between February 1 and September 27, 2019, were eligible. The exclusion criterion was the woman's objection to participation. Validated self-administered questionnaire (QACE) was sent by email 6 weeks after the child's birth. The main outcome was the experience of childbirth, assessed on a scale of 0 to 10. A good experience was defined by a score ≥ 8/10, and a poor experience by a score < 5. A multinomial logistic regression model, expressed by cumulative proportional odds ratios, were used to determine the factors that might have affected women's experiences during childbirth. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-fifth women completed the questionnaire, for a participation rate of 49.6%. Overall, 70.7% (n = 1501/2121) of the women reported a good experience, including 38% (n = 807/2121) who graded their experience with the maximum score of 10. On the other hand, 7.3% (n = 156) of the women reported a poor experience. Vaginal delivery (aOR 3.93, 95%CI, 3.04–5.08) and satisfactory management (aOR 11.35 (7.69–16.75)) were the principal determining factors of a positive experience. Epidural analgesia increased the feeling of failure (aOR 5.64, 95%CI, 2.75–13.66). Receiving information and being asked for and agreeing to consent improved the global experience (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The Identikit picture of the woman associated with a poor experience of childbirth shows a nullipara who had a complication during her pregnancy, gave birth after induction of labor, or by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery, with the newborn transferred for pediatric care, and medical management considered unsatisfactory. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9134581/ /pubmed/35619093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Arthuis, Chloé LeGoff, Juliette Olivier, Marion Coutin, Anne-Sophie Banaskiewicz, Nathalie Gillard, Philippe Legendre, Guillaume Winer, Norbert The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title | The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title_full | The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title_fullStr | The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title_full_unstemmed | The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title_short | The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network |
title_sort | experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a french perinatal network |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arthuischloe theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT legoffjuliette theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT oliviermarion theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT coutinannesophie theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT banaskiewicznathalie theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT gillardphilippe theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT legendreguillaume theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT winernorbert theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT arthuischloe experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT legoffjuliette experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT oliviermarion experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT coutinannesophie experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT banaskiewicznathalie experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT gillardphilippe experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT legendreguillaume experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork AT winernorbert experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork |