Cargando…

The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network

BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arthuis, Chloé, LeGoff, Juliette, Olivier, Marion, Coutin, Anne-Sophie, Banaskiewicz, Nathalie, Gillard, Philippe, Legendre, Guillaume, Winer, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7
_version_ 1784713794877915136
author Arthuis, Chloé
LeGoff, Juliette
Olivier, Marion
Coutin, Anne-Sophie
Banaskiewicz, Nathalie
Gillard, Philippe
Legendre, Guillaume
Winer, Norbert
author_facet Arthuis, Chloé
LeGoff, Juliette
Olivier, Marion
Coutin, Anne-Sophie
Banaskiewicz, Nathalie
Gillard, Philippe
Legendre, Guillaume
Winer, Norbert
author_sort Arthuis, Chloé
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHODS/DESIGN: This study was a multicenter, prospective cohort, conducted in 23 French maternity units constituting one perinatal network, in 2019. All adult women who understood French and gave birth between February 1 and September 27, 2019, were eligible. The exclusion criterion was the woman's objection to participation. Validated self-administered questionnaire (QACE) was sent by email 6 weeks after the child's birth. The main outcome was the experience of childbirth, assessed on a scale of 0 to 10. A good experience was defined by a score ≥ 8/10, and a poor experience by a score < 5. A multinomial logistic regression model, expressed by cumulative proportional odds ratios, were used to determine the factors that might have affected women's experiences during childbirth. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-fifth women completed the questionnaire, for a participation rate of 49.6%. Overall, 70.7% (n = 1501/2121) of the women reported a good experience, including 38% (n = 807/2121) who graded their experience with the maximum score of 10. On the other hand, 7.3% (n = 156) of the women reported a poor experience. Vaginal delivery (aOR 3.93, 95%CI, 3.04–5.08) and satisfactory management (aOR 11.35 (7.69–16.75)) were the principal determining factors of a positive experience. Epidural analgesia increased the feeling of failure (aOR 5.64, 95%CI, 2.75–13.66). Receiving information and being asked for and agreeing to consent improved the global experience (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The Identikit picture of the woman associated with a poor experience of childbirth shows a nullipara who had a complication during her pregnancy, gave birth after induction of labor, or by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery, with the newborn transferred for pediatric care, and medical management considered unsatisfactory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9134581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91345812022-05-27 The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network Arthuis, Chloé LeGoff, Juliette Olivier, Marion Coutin, Anne-Sophie Banaskiewicz, Nathalie Gillard, Philippe Legendre, Guillaume Winer, Norbert BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHODS/DESIGN: This study was a multicenter, prospective cohort, conducted in 23 French maternity units constituting one perinatal network, in 2019. All adult women who understood French and gave birth between February 1 and September 27, 2019, were eligible. The exclusion criterion was the woman's objection to participation. Validated self-administered questionnaire (QACE) was sent by email 6 weeks after the child's birth. The main outcome was the experience of childbirth, assessed on a scale of 0 to 10. A good experience was defined by a score ≥ 8/10, and a poor experience by a score < 5. A multinomial logistic regression model, expressed by cumulative proportional odds ratios, were used to determine the factors that might have affected women's experiences during childbirth. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-fifth women completed the questionnaire, for a participation rate of 49.6%. Overall, 70.7% (n = 1501/2121) of the women reported a good experience, including 38% (n = 807/2121) who graded their experience with the maximum score of 10. On the other hand, 7.3% (n = 156) of the women reported a poor experience. Vaginal delivery (aOR 3.93, 95%CI, 3.04–5.08) and satisfactory management (aOR 11.35 (7.69–16.75)) were the principal determining factors of a positive experience. Epidural analgesia increased the feeling of failure (aOR 5.64, 95%CI, 2.75–13.66). Receiving information and being asked for and agreeing to consent improved the global experience (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The Identikit picture of the woman associated with a poor experience of childbirth shows a nullipara who had a complication during her pregnancy, gave birth after induction of labor, or by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery, with the newborn transferred for pediatric care, and medical management considered unsatisfactory. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9134581/ /pubmed/35619093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Arthuis, Chloé
LeGoff, Juliette
Olivier, Marion
Coutin, Anne-Sophie
Banaskiewicz, Nathalie
Gillard, Philippe
Legendre, Guillaume
Winer, Norbert
The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title_full The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title_fullStr The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title_full_unstemmed The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title_short The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network
title_sort experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a french perinatal network
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04727-7
work_keys_str_mv AT arthuischloe theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT legoffjuliette theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT oliviermarion theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT coutinannesophie theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT banaskiewicznathalie theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT gillardphilippe theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT legendreguillaume theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT winernorbert theexperienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT arthuischloe experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT legoffjuliette experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT oliviermarion experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT coutinannesophie experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT banaskiewicznathalie experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT gillardphilippe experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT legendreguillaume experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork
AT winernorbert experienceofgivingbirthaprospectivecohortinafrenchperinatalnetwork