Cargando…

Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT) has been recognized as an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) and a novel treatment option for other diseases. However, the safety of IMT in patients has not been established. AIMS: This systematic review an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chong, Chen, Liyu, Sun, Dayong, Li, Cailan, Xi, Shiheng, Ding, Shihua, Luo, Rongrong, Geng, Yan, Bai, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00491-3
_version_ 1784713816691441664
author Chen, Chong
Chen, Liyu
Sun, Dayong
Li, Cailan
Xi, Shiheng
Ding, Shihua
Luo, Rongrong
Geng, Yan
Bai, Yang
author_facet Chen, Chong
Chen, Liyu
Sun, Dayong
Li, Cailan
Xi, Shiheng
Ding, Shihua
Luo, Rongrong
Geng, Yan
Bai, Yang
author_sort Chen, Chong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT) has been recognized as an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) and a novel treatment option for other diseases. However, the safety of IMT in patients has not been established. AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety of IMT. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IMT studies published up to 28 February 2021 using databases including PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Studies were excluded if they did not report adverse events (AEs). Two authors independently extracted the data. The relative risk (RR) of serious adverse events (SAEs) and common adverse events (CAEs) were estimated separately, as were predefined subgroups. Publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. RESULTS: Among 978 reports, 99 full‐text articles were screened, and 20 articles were included for meta-analysis, involving 1132 patients (603 in the IMT group and 529 in the control group). We found no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs between the IMT group and the control group (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.56–3.31, P = 0.50). Of these 20 studies, 7 described the number of patients with CAEs, involving 360 patients (195 in the IMT group and 166 in the control group). An analysis of the eight studies revealed that the incidence of CAEs was also not significantly increased in the IMT group compared with the control group (RR = 1.06, 95% CI  0.91–1.23, P = 0.43). Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of CAEs was significantly different between subgroups of delivery methods (P((CAE)) = 0.04), and the incidence of IMT-related SAEs and CAEs was not significantly different in the other predefined subgroups. CONCLUSION: Currently, IMT is widely used in many diseases, but its associated AEs should not be ignored. To improve the safety of IMT, patients' conditions should be fully evaluated before IMT, appropriate transplantation methods should be selected, each operative step of faecal bacteria transplantation should be strictly controlled, AE management mechanisms should be improved, and a close follow-up system should be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9134705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91347052022-05-27 Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Chong Chen, Liyu Sun, Dayong Li, Cailan Xi, Shiheng Ding, Shihua Luo, Rongrong Geng, Yan Bai, Yang Gut Pathog Review BACKGROUND: Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT) has been recognized as an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) and a novel treatment option for other diseases. However, the safety of IMT in patients has not been established. AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety of IMT. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IMT studies published up to 28 February 2021 using databases including PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Studies were excluded if they did not report adverse events (AEs). Two authors independently extracted the data. The relative risk (RR) of serious adverse events (SAEs) and common adverse events (CAEs) were estimated separately, as were predefined subgroups. Publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. RESULTS: Among 978 reports, 99 full‐text articles were screened, and 20 articles were included for meta-analysis, involving 1132 patients (603 in the IMT group and 529 in the control group). We found no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs between the IMT group and the control group (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.56–3.31, P = 0.50). Of these 20 studies, 7 described the number of patients with CAEs, involving 360 patients (195 in the IMT group and 166 in the control group). An analysis of the eight studies revealed that the incidence of CAEs was also not significantly increased in the IMT group compared with the control group (RR = 1.06, 95% CI  0.91–1.23, P = 0.43). Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of CAEs was significantly different between subgroups of delivery methods (P((CAE)) = 0.04), and the incidence of IMT-related SAEs and CAEs was not significantly different in the other predefined subgroups. CONCLUSION: Currently, IMT is widely used in many diseases, but its associated AEs should not be ignored. To improve the safety of IMT, patients' conditions should be fully evaluated before IMT, appropriate transplantation methods should be selected, each operative step of faecal bacteria transplantation should be strictly controlled, AE management mechanisms should be improved, and a close follow-up system should be established. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9134705/ /pubmed/35619175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00491-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Chong
Chen, Liyu
Sun, Dayong
Li, Cailan
Xi, Shiheng
Ding, Shihua
Luo, Rongrong
Geng, Yan
Bai, Yang
Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort adverse events of intestinal microbiota transplantation in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9134705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-022-00491-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchong adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenliyu adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sundayong adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT licailan adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xishiheng adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingshihua adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luorongrong adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gengyan adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baiyang adverseeventsofintestinalmicrobiotatransplantationinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis