Cargando…
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651408 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499 |
_version_ | 1784713992488353792 |
---|---|
author | Liew, Amos Nepacina Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan |
author_facet | Liew, Amos Nepacina Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan |
author_sort | Liew, Amos Nepacina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use of CINPT vs standard of care dressings (SOC) in wound management of post-operative breast surgery. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar for studies that compared CINPT against SOC. Seven studies were included in this systematic review. The results of our systematic review have shown that CINPT has a positive outcome in reducing post-operative wound complication rates as compared to SOC dressings (commonly Steri-Strips and waterproof dressings), which was 1-8% vs 1-30% in CINPT and SOC, respectively. Furthermore, CINPT has the potential to confer additional cost-savings of up to USD218 per patient for a health institution with regards to reduced complications rates that might have required extended management. The use of CINPT in breast surgery remains highly promising. It has many advantages over SOC, including better wound outcomes and added cost savings. Further studies are required to delineate the potential benefits in different sub-sets of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9135586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91355862022-05-31 Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review Liew, Amos Nepacina Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan Cureus General Surgery The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use of CINPT vs standard of care dressings (SOC) in wound management of post-operative breast surgery. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar for studies that compared CINPT against SOC. Seven studies were included in this systematic review. The results of our systematic review have shown that CINPT has a positive outcome in reducing post-operative wound complication rates as compared to SOC dressings (commonly Steri-Strips and waterproof dressings), which was 1-8% vs 1-30% in CINPT and SOC, respectively. Furthermore, CINPT has the potential to confer additional cost-savings of up to USD218 per patient for a health institution with regards to reduced complications rates that might have required extended management. The use of CINPT in breast surgery remains highly promising. It has many advantages over SOC, including better wound outcomes and added cost savings. Further studies are required to delineate the potential benefits in different sub-sets of patients. Cureus 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9135586/ /pubmed/35651408 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499 Text en Copyright © 2022, Liew et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Liew, Amos Nepacina Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | closed incision negative pressure therapy vs standard of care dressing in breast surgery: a systematic review |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651408 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liewamosnepacina closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview AT limkylieyenyi closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview AT khoojeremyfuquan closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview |