Cargando…

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review

The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liew, Amos Nepacina, Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi, Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651408
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499
_version_ 1784713992488353792
author Liew, Amos Nepacina
Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi
Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan
author_facet Liew, Amos Nepacina
Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi
Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan
author_sort Liew, Amos Nepacina
collection PubMed
description The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use of CINPT vs standard of care dressings (SOC) in wound management of post-operative breast surgery. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar for studies that compared CINPT against SOC. Seven studies were included in this systematic review. The results of our systematic review have shown that CINPT has a positive outcome in reducing post-operative wound complication rates as compared to SOC dressings (commonly Steri-Strips and waterproof dressings), which was 1-8% vs 1-30% in CINPT and SOC, respectively. Furthermore, CINPT has the potential to confer additional cost-savings of up to USD218 per patient for a health institution with regards to reduced complications rates that might have required extended management. The use of CINPT in breast surgery remains highly promising. It has many advantages over SOC, including better wound outcomes and added cost savings. Further studies are required to delineate the potential benefits in different sub-sets of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9135586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91355862022-05-31 Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review Liew, Amos Nepacina Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan Cureus General Surgery The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use of CINPT vs standard of care dressings (SOC) in wound management of post-operative breast surgery. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar for studies that compared CINPT against SOC. Seven studies were included in this systematic review. The results of our systematic review have shown that CINPT has a positive outcome in reducing post-operative wound complication rates as compared to SOC dressings (commonly Steri-Strips and waterproof dressings), which was 1-8% vs 1-30% in CINPT and SOC, respectively. Furthermore, CINPT has the potential to confer additional cost-savings of up to USD218 per patient for a health institution with regards to reduced complications rates that might have required extended management. The use of CINPT in breast surgery remains highly promising. It has many advantages over SOC, including better wound outcomes and added cost savings. Further studies are required to delineate the potential benefits in different sub-sets of patients. Cureus 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9135586/ /pubmed/35651408 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499 Text en Copyright © 2022, Liew et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Liew, Amos Nepacina
Lim, Kylie Yen-Yi
Khoo, Jeremy Fuquan
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_short Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_sort closed incision negative pressure therapy vs standard of care dressing in breast surgery: a systematic review
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651408
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24499
work_keys_str_mv AT liewamosnepacina closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview
AT limkylieyenyi closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview
AT khoojeremyfuquan closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyvsstandardofcaredressinginbreastsurgeryasystematicreview