Cargando…

Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high intensity (HI) vs low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) exercise on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 18 months after commencement of oncological treatment in patients with breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. In addition, we conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ax, Anna-Karin, Johansson, Birgitta, Lyth, Johan, Nordin, Karin, Börjeson, Sussanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35391574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07016-3
_version_ 1784714043806711808
author Ax, Anna-Karin
Johansson, Birgitta
Lyth, Johan
Nordin, Karin
Börjeson, Sussanne
author_facet Ax, Anna-Karin
Johansson, Birgitta
Lyth, Johan
Nordin, Karin
Börjeson, Sussanne
author_sort Ax, Anna-Karin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high intensity (HI) vs low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) exercise on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 18 months after commencement of oncological treatment in patients with breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. In addition, we conducted a comparison with usual care (UC). METHODS: Patients scheduled for (neo)adjuvant oncological treatment (n = 577) were randomly assigned to 6 months of combined resistance and endurance training of HI or LMI. A longitudinal descriptive study (UC) included participants (n = 89) immediately before the RCT started. HRQoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 3, 6 and 18 months (1 year after completed exercise intervention) follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to study the groups over time. RESULTS: Directly after the intervention, HI scored significant (P = 0.02), but not clinically relevant, higher pain compared with LMI. No other significant difference in HRQoL was found between the exercise intensities over time. Clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL over time were detected within both exercise intensities. We found favourable significant differences in HRQoL in both exercise intensities compared with UC over time. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the strong evidence of positive effect of exercise and shows that exercise, regardless of intensity, can have beneficial effects on HRQoL during oncological treatment and also for a substantial time after completion of an exercise intervention. In this study, for one year after. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patients can be advised to exercise at either intensity level according to their personal preferences, and still benefit from both short-term and long-term improvements in HRQoL. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07016-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9135802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91358022022-05-28 Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project Ax, Anna-Karin Johansson, Birgitta Lyth, Johan Nordin, Karin Börjeson, Sussanne Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high intensity (HI) vs low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) exercise on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 18 months after commencement of oncological treatment in patients with breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. In addition, we conducted a comparison with usual care (UC). METHODS: Patients scheduled for (neo)adjuvant oncological treatment (n = 577) were randomly assigned to 6 months of combined resistance and endurance training of HI or LMI. A longitudinal descriptive study (UC) included participants (n = 89) immediately before the RCT started. HRQoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 3, 6 and 18 months (1 year after completed exercise intervention) follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to study the groups over time. RESULTS: Directly after the intervention, HI scored significant (P = 0.02), but not clinically relevant, higher pain compared with LMI. No other significant difference in HRQoL was found between the exercise intensities over time. Clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL over time were detected within both exercise intensities. We found favourable significant differences in HRQoL in both exercise intensities compared with UC over time. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the strong evidence of positive effect of exercise and shows that exercise, regardless of intensity, can have beneficial effects on HRQoL during oncological treatment and also for a substantial time after completion of an exercise intervention. In this study, for one year after. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patients can be advised to exercise at either intensity level according to their personal preferences, and still benefit from both short-term and long-term improvements in HRQoL. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07016-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9135802/ /pubmed/35391574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07016-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ax, Anna-Karin
Johansson, Birgitta
Lyth, Johan
Nordin, Karin
Börjeson, Sussanne
Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title_full Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title_fullStr Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title_full_unstemmed Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title_short Short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the Phys-Can project
title_sort short- and long-term effect of high versus low-to-moderate intensity exercise to optimise health-related quality of life after oncological treatment—results from the phys-can project
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35391574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07016-3
work_keys_str_mv AT axannakarin shortandlongtermeffectofhighversuslowtomoderateintensityexercisetooptimisehealthrelatedqualityoflifeafteroncologicaltreatmentresultsfromthephyscanproject
AT johanssonbirgitta shortandlongtermeffectofhighversuslowtomoderateintensityexercisetooptimisehealthrelatedqualityoflifeafteroncologicaltreatmentresultsfromthephyscanproject
AT lythjohan shortandlongtermeffectofhighversuslowtomoderateintensityexercisetooptimisehealthrelatedqualityoflifeafteroncologicaltreatmentresultsfromthephyscanproject
AT nordinkarin shortandlongtermeffectofhighversuslowtomoderateintensityexercisetooptimisehealthrelatedqualityoflifeafteroncologicaltreatmentresultsfromthephyscanproject
AT borjesonsussanne shortandlongtermeffectofhighversuslowtomoderateintensityexercisetooptimisehealthrelatedqualityoflifeafteroncologicaltreatmentresultsfromthephyscanproject