Cargando…

Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE

Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Di, Tian, Lei, Zhang, Haixia, Zheng, Yan, Fu, Caiyun, Zhai, Changbin, Jie, Ying, Li, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924
_version_ 1784714100098465792
author Zhang, Di
Tian, Lei
Zhang, Haixia
Zheng, Yan
Fu, Caiyun
Zhai, Changbin
Jie, Ying
Li, Lin
author_facet Zhang, Di
Tian, Lei
Zhang, Haixia
Zheng, Yan
Fu, Caiyun
Zhai, Changbin
Jie, Ying
Li, Lin
author_sort Zhang, Di
collection PubMed
description Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST). Methods: CCT were matched in 23 eyes with FFKC, 23 eyes by SMILE in 3 months post-operatively, and 23 TNC eyes. The differences in corneal biomechanics by Corvis ST among the three groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in CCT among the three groups, and the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) did not differ significantly among the three groups (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences in most DCR parameters between pre- and post-operatively (all p < 0.05). Compared with TNC, the values of corneal deflection amplitude during the first applanation (A1DA), length at the first applanation (A1L), corneal deflection amplitude during the second applanation (A2DA), and maximum deformation amplitude (DA) decreased in 3 months after SMILE (all p < 0.05), these values increased in the FFKC (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the DCR parameters were different among the three groups. The parameters A1DA, A1L, A2DA, and DA may be different between TNC and Post-SMILE, TNC and FFKC, and Post-SMILE and FFKC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9136087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91360872022-05-28 Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE Zhang, Di Tian, Lei Zhang, Haixia Zheng, Yan Fu, Caiyun Zhai, Changbin Jie, Ying Li, Lin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST). Methods: CCT were matched in 23 eyes with FFKC, 23 eyes by SMILE in 3 months post-operatively, and 23 TNC eyes. The differences in corneal biomechanics by Corvis ST among the three groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in CCT among the three groups, and the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) did not differ significantly among the three groups (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences in most DCR parameters between pre- and post-operatively (all p < 0.05). Compared with TNC, the values of corneal deflection amplitude during the first applanation (A1DA), length at the first applanation (A1L), corneal deflection amplitude during the second applanation (A2DA), and maximum deformation amplitude (DA) decreased in 3 months after SMILE (all p < 0.05), these values increased in the FFKC (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the DCR parameters were different among the three groups. The parameters A1DA, A1L, A2DA, and DA may be different between TNC and Post-SMILE, TNC and FFKC, and Post-SMILE and FFKC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9136087/ /pubmed/35646859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Tian, Zhang, Zheng, Fu, Zhai, Jie and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Zhang, Di
Tian, Lei
Zhang, Haixia
Zheng, Yan
Fu, Caiyun
Zhai, Changbin
Jie, Ying
Li, Lin
Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title_full Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title_fullStr Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title_full_unstemmed Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title_short Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
title_sort differences of corneal biomechanics among thin normal cornea, forme-fruste keratoconus, and cornea after smile
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangdi differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT tianlei differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT zhanghaixia differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT zhengyan differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT fucaiyun differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT zhaichangbin differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT jieying differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile
AT lilin differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile