Cargando…
Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924 |
_version_ | 1784714100098465792 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Di Tian, Lei Zhang, Haixia Zheng, Yan Fu, Caiyun Zhai, Changbin Jie, Ying Li, Lin |
author_facet | Zhang, Di Tian, Lei Zhang, Haixia Zheng, Yan Fu, Caiyun Zhai, Changbin Jie, Ying Li, Lin |
author_sort | Zhang, Di |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST). Methods: CCT were matched in 23 eyes with FFKC, 23 eyes by SMILE in 3 months post-operatively, and 23 TNC eyes. The differences in corneal biomechanics by Corvis ST among the three groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in CCT among the three groups, and the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) did not differ significantly among the three groups (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences in most DCR parameters between pre- and post-operatively (all p < 0.05). Compared with TNC, the values of corneal deflection amplitude during the first applanation (A1DA), length at the first applanation (A1L), corneal deflection amplitude during the second applanation (A2DA), and maximum deformation amplitude (DA) decreased in 3 months after SMILE (all p < 0.05), these values increased in the FFKC (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the DCR parameters were different among the three groups. The parameters A1DA, A1L, A2DA, and DA may be different between TNC and Post-SMILE, TNC and FFKC, and Post-SMILE and FFKC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9136087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91360872022-05-28 Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE Zhang, Di Tian, Lei Zhang, Haixia Zheng, Yan Fu, Caiyun Zhai, Changbin Jie, Ying Li, Lin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST). Methods: CCT were matched in 23 eyes with FFKC, 23 eyes by SMILE in 3 months post-operatively, and 23 TNC eyes. The differences in corneal biomechanics by Corvis ST among the three groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in CCT among the three groups, and the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) did not differ significantly among the three groups (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences in most DCR parameters between pre- and post-operatively (all p < 0.05). Compared with TNC, the values of corneal deflection amplitude during the first applanation (A1DA), length at the first applanation (A1L), corneal deflection amplitude during the second applanation (A2DA), and maximum deformation amplitude (DA) decreased in 3 months after SMILE (all p < 0.05), these values increased in the FFKC (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the DCR parameters were different among the three groups. The parameters A1DA, A1L, A2DA, and DA may be different between TNC and Post-SMILE, TNC and FFKC, and Post-SMILE and FFKC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9136087/ /pubmed/35646859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Tian, Zhang, Zheng, Fu, Zhai, Jie and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Zhang, Di Tian, Lei Zhang, Haixia Zheng, Yan Fu, Caiyun Zhai, Changbin Jie, Ying Li, Lin Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title | Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title_full | Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title_fullStr | Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title_short | Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE |
title_sort | differences of corneal biomechanics among thin normal cornea, forme-fruste keratoconus, and cornea after smile |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35646859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.861924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangdi differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT tianlei differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT zhanghaixia differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT zhengyan differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT fucaiyun differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT zhaichangbin differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT jieying differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile AT lilin differencesofcornealbiomechanicsamongthinnormalcorneaformefrustekeratoconusandcorneaaftersmile |