Cargando…

Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index

Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended in clinical practice, their application in routine care is limited. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5) is a validated PROM for assessing foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore patient and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoque, Anika, Steultjens, Martijn, Dickson, Diane M., Hendry, Gordon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8
_version_ 1784714123633754112
author Hoque, Anika
Steultjens, Martijn
Dickson, Diane M.
Hendry, Gordon J.
author_facet Hoque, Anika
Steultjens, Martijn
Dickson, Diane M.
Hendry, Gordon J.
author_sort Hoque, Anika
collection PubMed
description Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended in clinical practice, their application in routine care is limited. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5) is a validated PROM for assessing foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore patient and clinician opinions and perceptions of the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5), eight RA patients and eight clinicians routinely involved in the management of RA patients participated in one semi-structured remote video-based interview. They provided their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the RADAI-F5. Three global themes were identified; 'Feet are a priority' as the impact of RA on the feet negatively impacted upon patient quality of life. The second theme was 'Need for a clinically feasible foot PROM' as participants recognised the current lack of a clinically feasible tool to determine RA foot disease. The third global theme of ‘Implementation’ was drawn together to form two subordinate themes: ‘Facilitators to RADAI-F5 implementation’ as the tool can promote communication, guide management, help screen foot symptoms, monitor foot disease status and treatments, and promote patient education and; ‘Barriers to RADAI-F5 implementation’ as there were associated practical difficulties, including lack of appointment time, administrative burdens, IT barriers and preference for further RADAI-F5 validation using imaging. The RADAI-F5 has significant potential as a clinical tool to aid foot disease management. However, implementation challenges must be overcome before broad adoption in rheumatology clinics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9136191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91361912022-06-02 Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index Hoque, Anika Steultjens, Martijn Dickson, Diane M. Hendry, Gordon J. Rheumatol Int Observational Research Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended in clinical practice, their application in routine care is limited. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5) is a validated PROM for assessing foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore patient and clinician opinions and perceptions of the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index (RADAI-F5), eight RA patients and eight clinicians routinely involved in the management of RA patients participated in one semi-structured remote video-based interview. They provided their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the RADAI-F5. Three global themes were identified; 'Feet are a priority' as the impact of RA on the feet negatively impacted upon patient quality of life. The second theme was 'Need for a clinically feasible foot PROM' as participants recognised the current lack of a clinically feasible tool to determine RA foot disease. The third global theme of ‘Implementation’ was drawn together to form two subordinate themes: ‘Facilitators to RADAI-F5 implementation’ as the tool can promote communication, guide management, help screen foot symptoms, monitor foot disease status and treatments, and promote patient education and; ‘Barriers to RADAI-F5 implementation’ as there were associated practical difficulties, including lack of appointment time, administrative burdens, IT barriers and preference for further RADAI-F5 validation using imaging. The RADAI-F5 has significant potential as a clinical tool to aid foot disease management. However, implementation challenges must be overcome before broad adoption in rheumatology clinics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9136191/ /pubmed/35622086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Observational Research
Hoque, Anika
Steultjens, Martijn
Dickson, Diane M.
Hendry, Gordon J.
Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title_full Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title_fullStr Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title_short Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Foot Disease Activity Index
title_sort patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the rheumatoid arthritis foot disease activity index
topic Observational Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05147-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hoqueanika patientsandcliniciansperspectivesontheclinicalutilityoftherheumatoidarthritisfootdiseaseactivityindex
AT steultjensmartijn patientsandcliniciansperspectivesontheclinicalutilityoftherheumatoidarthritisfootdiseaseactivityindex
AT dicksondianem patientsandcliniciansperspectivesontheclinicalutilityoftherheumatoidarthritisfootdiseaseactivityindex
AT hendrygordonj patientsandcliniciansperspectivesontheclinicalutilityoftherheumatoidarthritisfootdiseaseactivityindex