Cargando…

Technique, outcome and changes in prostate dimensions in patients with urinary retention managed by aquablation

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the functional and urodynamic outcome of Aquablation in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) on catheters. METHODS: Men aged 50–70 who failed medical treatment of BPO with AUR failing to wean off urethral catheter were recruited to undergo Aquablation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yee, Chi-Hang, Tang, Sui-Fan, Yuen, Steffi Kar-Kei, Chan, Chi-Kwok, Teoh, Jeremy Y. C., Chiu, Peter K. F., Ng, Chi-Fai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03244-y
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the functional and urodynamic outcome of Aquablation in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) on catheters. METHODS: Men aged 50–70 who failed medical treatment of BPO with AUR failing to wean off urethral catheter were recruited to undergo Aquablation. Individuals were assessed pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was defined by the success rate of weaning off catheter. Secondary outcomes were measured by a change in prostate size, symptom scores and urodynamic parameters. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent Aquablation between June 2019 and September 2020. Mean duration of the urethral catheter in-situ was 5.9 ± 4.9 weeks and mean prostate size of the cohort pre-operatively was 60.8 ± 15.8 cc. A second pass Aqaublation treatment was performed in 14 patients. Five patients failed to wean off the catheter on the first attempt after surgery, requiring another attempt 1 week later which were all successful. At 3 months after the operation, a significant reduction in prostate volume was observed (60.8 ± 15.8 cc vs 24.9 ± 10.3 cc, p < 0.001). No change in international index of erectile function (IIEF) was found (baseline: 16.1 ± 5.8; 3-month: 14.9 ± 6.4; p = 0.953). Mean bladder outlet obstruction index was 14.2 ± 23.0 at 6 months upon urodynamic assessment with 75% of patients had a resolution of detrusor overactivity. Reduction in prostate length was found to be more significant than a reduction in width and height after Aquablation (R = 0.693, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: From the early data of a single centre, Aquablation was shown to provide a consistent improvement in symptoms, uroflowmetry and urodynamic parameters in patient with a urethral catheter. Results from our study suggest that improvement from Aquablation is reproducible in patients with AUR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11255-022-03244-y.