Cargando…

Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions

Individual informed consent is a central requirement for clinical research on human subjects, yet whether and how consent requirements should apply to health policy experiments (HPEs) remains unclear. HPEs test and evaluate public health policies prior to implementation. We interviewed 58 health exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid, McMahon, Shannon, Eyal, Nir, Hossain, Puspita, Rabbani, Atonu, Barua, Mrittika, Sarker, Malabika, Metta, Emmy, Mmbaga, Elia, Leshabari, Melkizedeck, Wikler, Daniel, Bärnighausen, Till
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221076764
_version_ 1784714164174848000
author Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
McMahon, Shannon
Eyal, Nir
Hossain, Puspita
Rabbani, Atonu
Barua, Mrittika
Sarker, Malabika
Metta, Emmy
Mmbaga, Elia
Leshabari, Melkizedeck
Wikler, Daniel
Bärnighausen, Till
author_facet Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
McMahon, Shannon
Eyal, Nir
Hossain, Puspita
Rabbani, Atonu
Barua, Mrittika
Sarker, Malabika
Metta, Emmy
Mmbaga, Elia
Leshabari, Melkizedeck
Wikler, Daniel
Bärnighausen, Till
author_sort Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
collection PubMed
description Individual informed consent is a central requirement for clinical research on human subjects, yet whether and how consent requirements should apply to health policy experiments (HPEs) remains unclear. HPEs test and evaluate public health policies prior to implementation. We interviewed 58 health experts in Tanzania, Bangladesh and Germany on informed consent requirements for HPEs. Health experts across all countries favored a strong evidence base, prior information to the affected populations, and individual consent for ‘risky’ HPEs. Differences pertained to individual risk perception, how and when consent by group representatives should be obtained and whether HPEs could be treated as health policies. The study adds to representative consent options for HPEs, yet shows that more research is needed in this field – particularly in the present Covid-19 pandemic which has highlighted the need for HPEs nationally and globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9136368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91363682022-05-28 Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid McMahon, Shannon Eyal, Nir Hossain, Puspita Rabbani, Atonu Barua, Mrittika Sarker, Malabika Metta, Emmy Mmbaga, Elia Leshabari, Melkizedeck Wikler, Daniel Bärnighausen, Till J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent Individual informed consent is a central requirement for clinical research on human subjects, yet whether and how consent requirements should apply to health policy experiments (HPEs) remains unclear. HPEs test and evaluate public health policies prior to implementation. We interviewed 58 health experts in Tanzania, Bangladesh and Germany on informed consent requirements for HPEs. Health experts across all countries favored a strong evidence base, prior information to the affected populations, and individual consent for ‘risky’ HPEs. Differences pertained to individual risk perception, how and when consent by group representatives should be obtained and whether HPEs could be treated as health policies. The study adds to representative consent options for HPEs, yet shows that more research is needed in this field – particularly in the present Covid-19 pandemic which has highlighted the need for HPEs nationally and globally. SAGE Publications 2022-02-10 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9136368/ /pubmed/35617114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221076764 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
McMahon, Shannon
Eyal, Nir
Hossain, Puspita
Rabbani, Atonu
Barua, Mrittika
Sarker, Malabika
Metta, Emmy
Mmbaga, Elia
Leshabari, Melkizedeck
Wikler, Daniel
Bärnighausen, Till
Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title_full Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title_fullStr Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title_full_unstemmed Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title_short Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions
title_sort consent requirements for testing health policies: an intercontinental comparison of expert opinions
topic Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221076764
work_keys_str_mv AT bernerrodoredaastrid consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT mcmahonshannon consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT eyalnir consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT hossainpuspita consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT rabbaniatonu consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT baruamrittika consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT sarkermalabika consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT mettaemmy consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT mmbagaelia consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT leshabarimelkizedeck consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT wiklerdaniel consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions
AT barnighausentill consentrequirementsfortestinghealthpoliciesanintercontinentalcomparisonofexpertopinions