Cargando…
Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459 |
_version_ | 1784714191500738560 |
---|---|
author | Preston, Frank G Meng, Yanda Zheng, Yalin Hsuan, James Hamill, Kevin J McCormick, Austin G |
author_facet | Preston, Frank G Meng, Yanda Zheng, Yalin Hsuan, James Hamill, Kevin J McCormick, Austin G |
author_sort | Preston, Frank G |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly deidentified images and displayed to participants in a structured interview session. 55.5% were recognised when all facial features were covered using a black box, leaving only the hair and neck exposed. The letterbox view proved more effective, reaching over 50% recognition only once the periorbital region, eyebrows, and forehead were visible. The half letterbox was the most effective, requiring the nose to be revealed before recognition reached over 50%, and should be the option of choice where appropriate. These findings provide valuable information for informed consent discussions, and we recommend consent to publish forms should stipulate the deidentification method that will be used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9136482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91364822022-05-28 Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods Preston, Frank G Meng, Yanda Zheng, Yalin Hsuan, James Hamill, Kevin J McCormick, Austin G J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly deidentified images and displayed to participants in a structured interview session. 55.5% were recognised when all facial features were covered using a black box, leaving only the hair and neck exposed. The letterbox view proved more effective, reaching over 50% recognition only once the periorbital region, eyebrows, and forehead were visible. The half letterbox was the most effective, requiring the nose to be revealed before recognition reached over 50%, and should be the option of choice where appropriate. These findings provide valuable information for informed consent discussions, and we recommend consent to publish forms should stipulate the deidentification method that will be used. SAGE Publications 2022-01-24 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9136482/ /pubmed/35068259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent Preston, Frank G Meng, Yanda Zheng, Yalin Hsuan, James Hamill, Kevin J McCormick, Austin G Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title | Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title_full | Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title_fullStr | Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title_short | Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods |
title_sort | informed consent in facial photograph publishing: a cross-sectional pilot study to determine the effectiveness of deidentification methods |
topic | Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prestonfrankg informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods AT mengyanda informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods AT zhengyalin informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods AT hsuanjames informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods AT hamillkevinj informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods AT mccormickausting informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods |