Cargando…

Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods

This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preston, Frank G, Meng, Yanda, Zheng, Yalin, Hsuan, James, Hamill, Kevin J, McCormick, Austin G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459
_version_ 1784714191500738560
author Preston, Frank G
Meng, Yanda
Zheng, Yalin
Hsuan, James
Hamill, Kevin J
McCormick, Austin G
author_facet Preston, Frank G
Meng, Yanda
Zheng, Yalin
Hsuan, James
Hamill, Kevin J
McCormick, Austin G
author_sort Preston, Frank G
collection PubMed
description This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly deidentified images and displayed to participants in a structured interview session. 55.5% were recognised when all facial features were covered using a black box, leaving only the hair and neck exposed. The letterbox view proved more effective, reaching over 50% recognition only once the periorbital region, eyebrows, and forehead were visible. The half letterbox was the most effective, requiring the nose to be revealed before recognition reached over 50%, and should be the option of choice where appropriate. These findings provide valuable information for informed consent discussions, and we recommend consent to publish forms should stipulate the deidentification method that will be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9136482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91364822022-05-28 Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods Preston, Frank G Meng, Yanda Zheng, Yalin Hsuan, James Hamill, Kevin J McCormick, Austin G J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly deidentified images and displayed to participants in a structured interview session. 55.5% were recognised when all facial features were covered using a black box, leaving only the hair and neck exposed. The letterbox view proved more effective, reaching over 50% recognition only once the periorbital region, eyebrows, and forehead were visible. The half letterbox was the most effective, requiring the nose to be revealed before recognition reached over 50%, and should be the option of choice where appropriate. These findings provide valuable information for informed consent discussions, and we recommend consent to publish forms should stipulate the deidentification method that will be used. SAGE Publications 2022-01-24 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9136482/ /pubmed/35068259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent
Preston, Frank G
Meng, Yanda
Zheng, Yalin
Hsuan, James
Hamill, Kevin J
McCormick, Austin G
Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title_full Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title_fullStr Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title_full_unstemmed Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title_short Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods
title_sort informed consent in facial photograph publishing: a cross-sectional pilot study to determine the effectiveness of deidentification methods
topic Empirical Studies of Issues in Informed Consent
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075459
work_keys_str_mv AT prestonfrankg informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods
AT mengyanda informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods
AT zhengyalin informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods
AT hsuanjames informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods
AT hamillkevinj informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods
AT mccormickausting informedconsentinfacialphotographpublishingacrosssectionalpilotstudytodeterminetheeffectivenessofdeidentificationmethods