Cargando…

Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020

BACKGROUND: There is variability in intensive care unit (ICU) resources and staffing worldwide. This may reflect variation in practice and outcomes across all health systems. AIM: To improve research and quality improvement measures administrative leaders can create long-term strategies by understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nawaz, Faisal A, Deo, Neha, Surani, Salim, Maynard, William, Gibbs, Martin L, Kashyap, Rahul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331973
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169
_version_ 1784714243143106560
author Nawaz, Faisal A
Deo, Neha
Surani, Salim
Maynard, William
Gibbs, Martin L
Kashyap, Rahul
author_facet Nawaz, Faisal A
Deo, Neha
Surani, Salim
Maynard, William
Gibbs, Martin L
Kashyap, Rahul
author_sort Nawaz, Faisal A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is variability in intensive care unit (ICU) resources and staffing worldwide. This may reflect variation in practice and outcomes across all health systems. AIM: To improve research and quality improvement measures administrative leaders can create long-term strategies by understanding the nature of ICU practices on a global scale. METHODS: The Global ICU Needs Assessment Research Group was formed on the basis of diversified skill sets. We aimed to survey sites regarding ICU type, availability of staffing, and adherence to critical care protocols. An international survey ‘Global ICU Needs Assessment’ was created using Google Forms, and this was distributed from February 17(th), 2020 till September 23(rd), 2020. The survey was shared with ICU providers in 34 countries. Various approaches to motivating healthcare providers were implemented in securing submissions, including use of emails, phone calls, social media applications, and WhatsApp™. By completing this survey, providers gave their consent for research purposes. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULTS: There were a total 121 adult/adult-pediatrics ICU responses from 34 countries in 76 cities. A majority of the ICUs were mixed medical-surgical [92 (76%)]. 108 (89%) were adult-only ICUs. Total 36 respondents (29.8%) were 31-40 years of age, with 79 (65%) male and 41 (35%) female participants. 89 were consultants (74%). A total of 71 (59%) respondents reported having a 24-h in-house intensivist. A total of 87 (72%) ICUs were reported to have either a 2:1 or ≥ 2:1 patient/nurse ratio. About 44% of the ICUs were open and 76% were mixed type (medical-surgical). Protocols followed regularly by the ICUs included sepsis care (82%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (79%); nutrition (76%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (84%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (84%), and glycemic control (89%). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this international, multi-dimensional, needs-assessment survey, there is a need for increased recruitment and staffing in critical care facilities, along with improved patient-to-nurse ratios. Future research is warranted in this field with focus on implementing appropriate health standards, protocols and resources for optimal efficiency in critical care worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9136725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91367252022-06-04 Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020 Nawaz, Faisal A Deo, Neha Surani, Salim Maynard, William Gibbs, Martin L Kashyap, Rahul World J Crit Care Med Observational Study BACKGROUND: There is variability in intensive care unit (ICU) resources and staffing worldwide. This may reflect variation in practice and outcomes across all health systems. AIM: To improve research and quality improvement measures administrative leaders can create long-term strategies by understanding the nature of ICU practices on a global scale. METHODS: The Global ICU Needs Assessment Research Group was formed on the basis of diversified skill sets. We aimed to survey sites regarding ICU type, availability of staffing, and adherence to critical care protocols. An international survey ‘Global ICU Needs Assessment’ was created using Google Forms, and this was distributed from February 17(th), 2020 till September 23(rd), 2020. The survey was shared with ICU providers in 34 countries. Various approaches to motivating healthcare providers were implemented in securing submissions, including use of emails, phone calls, social media applications, and WhatsApp™. By completing this survey, providers gave their consent for research purposes. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULTS: There were a total 121 adult/adult-pediatrics ICU responses from 34 countries in 76 cities. A majority of the ICUs were mixed medical-surgical [92 (76%)]. 108 (89%) were adult-only ICUs. Total 36 respondents (29.8%) were 31-40 years of age, with 79 (65%) male and 41 (35%) female participants. 89 were consultants (74%). A total of 71 (59%) respondents reported having a 24-h in-house intensivist. A total of 87 (72%) ICUs were reported to have either a 2:1 or ≥ 2:1 patient/nurse ratio. About 44% of the ICUs were open and 76% were mixed type (medical-surgical). Protocols followed regularly by the ICUs included sepsis care (82%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (79%); nutrition (76%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (84%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (84%), and glycemic control (89%). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this international, multi-dimensional, needs-assessment survey, there is a need for increased recruitment and staffing in critical care facilities, along with improved patient-to-nurse ratios. Future research is warranted in this field with focus on implementing appropriate health standards, protocols and resources for optimal efficiency in critical care worldwide. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9136725/ /pubmed/36331973 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Observational Study
Nawaz, Faisal A
Deo, Neha
Surani, Salim
Maynard, William
Gibbs, Martin L
Kashyap, Rahul
Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title_full Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title_fullStr Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title_full_unstemmed Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title_short Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
title_sort critical care practices in the world: results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331973
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169
work_keys_str_mv AT nawazfaisala criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020
AT deoneha criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020
AT suranisalim criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020
AT maynardwilliam criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020
AT gibbsmartinl criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020
AT kashyaprahul criticalcarepracticesintheworldresultsoftheglobalintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurvey2020