Cargando…
Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x |
_version_ | 1784714310819250176 |
---|---|
author | Rajabaleyan, Pooya Michelsen, Jens Tange Holst, Uffe Möller, Sören Toft, Palle Luxhøi, Jan Buyukuslu, Musa Bohm, Aske Mathias Borly, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Kobborg, Martin Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian Schou Løve, Uffe Ovesen, Sophie Grant Sølling, Christoffer Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte Lund Lomholt, Marianne Ritz Møller, Dorthe Qvist, Niels Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark |
author_facet | Rajabaleyan, Pooya Michelsen, Jens Tange Holst, Uffe Möller, Sören Toft, Palle Luxhøi, Jan Buyukuslu, Musa Bohm, Aske Mathias Borly, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Kobborg, Martin Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian Schou Løve, Uffe Ovesen, Sophie Grant Sølling, Christoffer Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte Lund Lomholt, Marianne Ritz Møller, Dorthe Qvist, Niels Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark |
author_sort | Rajabaleyan, Pooya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods potential benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: This study will be a randomised controlled multicentre trial, including patients aged 18 years or older with purulent or faecal peritonitis confined to at least two of the four abdominal quadrants originating from the small intestine, colon, or rectum. Randomisation will be web-based to either primary closure with ROD or VAC in blocks of 2, 4, and 6. The primary endpoint is peritonitis-related complications within 30 or 90 days and one year after index operation. Secondary outcomes are comprehensive complication index (CCI) and mortality after 30 or 90 days and one year; quality of life assessment by (SF-36) after three and 12 months, the development of incisional hernia after 12 months assessed by clinical examination and CT-scanning and healthcare resource utilisation. With an estimated superiority of 15% in the primary outcome for VAC, 340 patients must be included. Hospitals in Denmark and Europe will be invited to participate. DISCUSSION: There is no robust evidence for choosing either open abdomen with VAC treatment or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis. The present study has the potential to answer this important clinical question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03932461). Protocol version 1.0, 9 January 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9137120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91371202022-05-28 Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Rajabaleyan, Pooya Michelsen, Jens Tange Holst, Uffe Möller, Sören Toft, Palle Luxhøi, Jan Buyukuslu, Musa Bohm, Aske Mathias Borly, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Kobborg, Martin Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian Schou Løve, Uffe Ovesen, Sophie Grant Sølling, Christoffer Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte Lund Lomholt, Marianne Ritz Møller, Dorthe Qvist, Niels Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark World J Emerg Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods potential benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: This study will be a randomised controlled multicentre trial, including patients aged 18 years or older with purulent or faecal peritonitis confined to at least two of the four abdominal quadrants originating from the small intestine, colon, or rectum. Randomisation will be web-based to either primary closure with ROD or VAC in blocks of 2, 4, and 6. The primary endpoint is peritonitis-related complications within 30 or 90 days and one year after index operation. Secondary outcomes are comprehensive complication index (CCI) and mortality after 30 or 90 days and one year; quality of life assessment by (SF-36) after three and 12 months, the development of incisional hernia after 12 months assessed by clinical examination and CT-scanning and healthcare resource utilisation. With an estimated superiority of 15% in the primary outcome for VAC, 340 patients must be included. Hospitals in Denmark and Europe will be invited to participate. DISCUSSION: There is no robust evidence for choosing either open abdomen with VAC treatment or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis. The present study has the potential to answer this important clinical question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03932461). Protocol version 1.0, 9 January 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9137120/ /pubmed/35619144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rajabaleyan, Pooya Michelsen, Jens Tange Holst, Uffe Möller, Sören Toft, Palle Luxhøi, Jan Buyukuslu, Musa Bohm, Aske Mathias Borly, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Kobborg, Martin Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian Schou Løve, Uffe Ovesen, Sophie Grant Sølling, Christoffer Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte Lund Lomholt, Marianne Ritz Møller, Dorthe Qvist, Niels Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the vacor trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajabaleyanpooya vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT michelsenjens vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tangeholstuffe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mollersoren vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT toftpalle vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT luxhøijan vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT buyukuslumusa vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bohmaskemathias vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT borlylars vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sandblomgabriel vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kobborgmartin vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aagaardpoulsenkristian vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schouløveuffe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ovesensophie vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT grantsøllingchristoffer vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mørchsøndergaardbirgitte vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lundlomholtmarianne vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ritzmøllerdorthe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT qvistniels vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bremholmellebækmark vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |