Cargando…

Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajabaleyan, Pooya, Michelsen, Jens, Tange Holst, Uffe, Möller, Sören, Toft, Palle, Luxhøi, Jan, Buyukuslu, Musa, Bohm, Aske Mathias, Borly, Lars, Sandblom, Gabriel, Kobborg, Martin, Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian, Schou Løve, Uffe, Ovesen, Sophie, Grant Sølling, Christoffer, Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte, Lund Lomholt, Marianne, Ritz Møller, Dorthe, Qvist, Niels, Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x
_version_ 1784714310819250176
author Rajabaleyan, Pooya
Michelsen, Jens
Tange Holst, Uffe
Möller, Sören
Toft, Palle
Luxhøi, Jan
Buyukuslu, Musa
Bohm, Aske Mathias
Borly, Lars
Sandblom, Gabriel
Kobborg, Martin
Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian
Schou Løve, Uffe
Ovesen, Sophie
Grant Sølling, Christoffer
Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte
Lund Lomholt, Marianne
Ritz Møller, Dorthe
Qvist, Niels
Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark
author_facet Rajabaleyan, Pooya
Michelsen, Jens
Tange Holst, Uffe
Möller, Sören
Toft, Palle
Luxhøi, Jan
Buyukuslu, Musa
Bohm, Aske Mathias
Borly, Lars
Sandblom, Gabriel
Kobborg, Martin
Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian
Schou Løve, Uffe
Ovesen, Sophie
Grant Sølling, Christoffer
Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte
Lund Lomholt, Marianne
Ritz Møller, Dorthe
Qvist, Niels
Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark
author_sort Rajabaleyan, Pooya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods potential benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: This study will be a randomised controlled multicentre trial, including patients aged 18 years or older with purulent or faecal peritonitis confined to at least two of the four abdominal quadrants originating from the small intestine, colon, or rectum. Randomisation will be web-based to either primary closure with ROD or VAC in blocks of 2, 4, and 6. The primary endpoint is peritonitis-related complications within 30 or 90 days and one year after index operation. Secondary outcomes are comprehensive complication index (CCI) and mortality after 30 or 90 days and one year; quality of life assessment by (SF-36) after three and 12 months, the development of incisional hernia after 12 months assessed by clinical examination and CT-scanning and healthcare resource utilisation. With an estimated superiority of 15% in the primary outcome for VAC, 340 patients must be included. Hospitals in Denmark and Europe will be invited to participate. DISCUSSION: There is no robust evidence for choosing either open abdomen with VAC treatment or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis. The present study has the potential to answer this important clinical question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03932461). Protocol version 1.0, 9 January 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9137120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91371202022-05-28 Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Rajabaleyan, Pooya Michelsen, Jens Tange Holst, Uffe Möller, Sören Toft, Palle Luxhøi, Jan Buyukuslu, Musa Bohm, Aske Mathias Borly, Lars Sandblom, Gabriel Kobborg, Martin Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian Schou Løve, Uffe Ovesen, Sophie Grant Sølling, Christoffer Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte Lund Lomholt, Marianne Ritz Møller, Dorthe Qvist, Niels Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark World J Emerg Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods potential benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: This study will be a randomised controlled multicentre trial, including patients aged 18 years or older with purulent or faecal peritonitis confined to at least two of the four abdominal quadrants originating from the small intestine, colon, or rectum. Randomisation will be web-based to either primary closure with ROD or VAC in blocks of 2, 4, and 6. The primary endpoint is peritonitis-related complications within 30 or 90 days and one year after index operation. Secondary outcomes are comprehensive complication index (CCI) and mortality after 30 or 90 days and one year; quality of life assessment by (SF-36) after three and 12 months, the development of incisional hernia after 12 months assessed by clinical examination and CT-scanning and healthcare resource utilisation. With an estimated superiority of 15% in the primary outcome for VAC, 340 patients must be included. Hospitals in Denmark and Europe will be invited to participate. DISCUSSION: There is no robust evidence for choosing either open abdomen with VAC treatment or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis. The present study has the potential to answer this important clinical question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03932461). Protocol version 1.0, 9 January 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9137120/ /pubmed/35619144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rajabaleyan, Pooya
Michelsen, Jens
Tange Holst, Uffe
Möller, Sören
Toft, Palle
Luxhøi, Jan
Buyukuslu, Musa
Bohm, Aske Mathias
Borly, Lars
Sandblom, Gabriel
Kobborg, Martin
Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian
Schou Løve, Uffe
Ovesen, Sophie
Grant Sølling, Christoffer
Mørch Søndergaard, Birgitte
Lund Lomholt, Marianne
Ritz Møller, Dorthe
Qvist, Niels
Bremholm Ellebæk, Mark
Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the vacor trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rajabaleyanpooya vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT michelsenjens vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tangeholstuffe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mollersoren vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toftpalle vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT luxhøijan vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buyukuslumusa vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bohmaskemathias vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT borlylars vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sandblomgabriel vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kobborgmartin vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aagaardpoulsenkristian vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schouløveuffe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ovesensophie vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grantsøllingchristoffer vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mørchsøndergaardbirgitte vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lundlomholtmarianne vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ritzmøllerdorthe vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT qvistniels vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bremholmellebækmark vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vacuumassistedclosureversusondemandrelaparotomyinpatientswithsecondaryperitonitisthevacortrialprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial