Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND: This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. METHODS: Related literature was retrieved from PubMed, W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Guangzhe, Wu, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1
_version_ 1784714329647480832
author Zhang, Guangzhe
Wu, Bo
author_facet Zhang, Guangzhe
Wu, Bo
author_sort Zhang, Guangzhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. METHODS: Related literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Articles on LA and OA for AA published between 2010 and 2021 were selected to extract data. Besides, Stata16.0 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 777 articles were retrieved, and 16 of them were finally selected. Totally, 1251 patients underwent LA, while 898 patients received OA. According to the results of meta-analysis, LA was associated with lower incidence of adverse reactions [OR = 0.257, 95% CI (0.162, 0.408), P < 0.001], shorter operation time (SMD = − 1.802, 95% CI − 2.435, − 1.169; P < 0.001) and hospitalization (SMD = − 1.184, 95% CI − 1.512, − 0.856; P < 0.001). In addition, compared with the OA group, LA was found with less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = − 3.650, 95% CI − 5.088, − 2.212; P < 0.001) and shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (SMD = − 3.010, 95% CI − 3.816, − 2.203; P < 0.001). Aside from all these, the counts of leukocyte (SMD = − 0.432, 95% CI: − 0.775, − 0.089; P = 0.013), neutrophil (SMD = − 1.346, 95% CI − 2.560, − 0.133; P = 0.030), and C-reactive protein (SMD = − 2.391, 95% CI − 3.901, − 0.882; P = 0.002) all decreased in a significant manner after LA. CONCLUSION: Compared with OA, LA boasts the advantages of less adverse reactions, shorter operation time and hospitalization, fewer complications, and lower inflammatory response, evidencing its safety and feasibility of applying in the treatment of AA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9137214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91372142022-05-28 Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis Zhang, Guangzhe Wu, Bo World J Emerg Surg Research BACKGROUND: This paper compares the postoperative recovery of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA), aiming to determine the optimal diagnosis and treatment plan for appendectomy. METHODS: Related literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Articles on LA and OA for AA published between 2010 and 2021 were selected to extract data. Besides, Stata16.0 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 777 articles were retrieved, and 16 of them were finally selected. Totally, 1251 patients underwent LA, while 898 patients received OA. According to the results of meta-analysis, LA was associated with lower incidence of adverse reactions [OR = 0.257, 95% CI (0.162, 0.408), P < 0.001], shorter operation time (SMD = − 1.802, 95% CI − 2.435, − 1.169; P < 0.001) and hospitalization (SMD = − 1.184, 95% CI − 1.512, − 0.856; P < 0.001). In addition, compared with the OA group, LA was found with less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = − 3.650, 95% CI − 5.088, − 2.212; P < 0.001) and shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (SMD = − 3.010, 95% CI − 3.816, − 2.203; P < 0.001). Aside from all these, the counts of leukocyte (SMD = − 0.432, 95% CI: − 0.775, − 0.089; P = 0.013), neutrophil (SMD = − 1.346, 95% CI − 2.560, − 0.133; P = 0.030), and C-reactive protein (SMD = − 2.391, 95% CI − 3.901, − 0.882; P = 0.002) all decreased in a significant manner after LA. CONCLUSION: Compared with OA, LA boasts the advantages of less adverse reactions, shorter operation time and hospitalization, fewer complications, and lower inflammatory response, evidencing its safety and feasibility of applying in the treatment of AA. BioMed Central 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9137214/ /pubmed/35619101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Guangzhe
Wu, Bo
Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_full Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_short Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
title_sort meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35619101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00431-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangguangzhe metaanalysisoftheclinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicappendectomyinthetreatmentofacuteappendicitis
AT wubo metaanalysisoftheclinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicappendectomyinthetreatmentofacuteappendicitis