Cargando…

Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: Maximal exercise testing is considered the gold standard to assess V̇O(2)max. However, maximal exercise testing was previously deemed unfeasible and unsafe in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Consequently, most previous studies on aerobic capacity and functioning in patients with CL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vermue, Daniël J, Dol, Max V, Ansuategui Echeita, Jone, Dekker, Rienk, Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R, Reneman, Michiel F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001253
_version_ 1784714355099566080
author Vermue, Daniël J
Dol, Max V
Ansuategui Echeita, Jone
Dekker, Rienk
Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R
Reneman, Michiel F
author_facet Vermue, Daniël J
Dol, Max V
Ansuategui Echeita, Jone
Dekker, Rienk
Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R
Reneman, Michiel F
author_sort Vermue, Daniël J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Maximal exercise testing is considered the gold standard to assess V̇O(2)max. However, maximal exercise testing was previously deemed unfeasible and unsafe in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Consequently, most previous studies on aerobic capacity and functioning in patients with CLBP were performed with submaximal testing protocols. A recent study demonstrated the safety, feasibility and tolerance of maximal exercise testing in patients with CLBP. Therefore, the relation between aerobic capacity and functioning should be reevaluated. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the relationship between maximal aerobic capacity and four measures of functioning: lifting capacity, work ability, pain-related disability and physical functioning in patients with CLBP. METHODS: The maximal aerobic capacity of patients with CLBP was assessed with a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Functioning was measured with a floor-to-waist lifting capacity test and three questionnaires: Work Ability Score, Pain Disability Index and Physical Functioning subscale of RAND-36. The associations between maximal aerobic capacity and each of the functioning measures were analysed with multiple linear regression analyses while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Data of n=74 patients with CLBP were analysed. After controlling for potential confounders, maximal aerobic capacity was moderately associated with lifting capacity (β=0.32, p=0.006), but not with any of the other functioning measures (β=−0.08 to 0.12, p>0.288). CONCLUSION: A higher level of maximal aerobic capacity is moderately associated with a higher lifting capacity, but not with self-reported work ability, pain-related disability and physical functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9137331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91373312022-06-10 Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study Vermue, Daniël J Dol, Max V Ansuategui Echeita, Jone Dekker, Rienk Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R Reneman, Michiel F BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Research OBJECTIVE: Maximal exercise testing is considered the gold standard to assess V̇O(2)max. However, maximal exercise testing was previously deemed unfeasible and unsafe in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Consequently, most previous studies on aerobic capacity and functioning in patients with CLBP were performed with submaximal testing protocols. A recent study demonstrated the safety, feasibility and tolerance of maximal exercise testing in patients with CLBP. Therefore, the relation between aerobic capacity and functioning should be reevaluated. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the relationship between maximal aerobic capacity and four measures of functioning: lifting capacity, work ability, pain-related disability and physical functioning in patients with CLBP. METHODS: The maximal aerobic capacity of patients with CLBP was assessed with a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Functioning was measured with a floor-to-waist lifting capacity test and three questionnaires: Work Ability Score, Pain Disability Index and Physical Functioning subscale of RAND-36. The associations between maximal aerobic capacity and each of the functioning measures were analysed with multiple linear regression analyses while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Data of n=74 patients with CLBP were analysed. After controlling for potential confounders, maximal aerobic capacity was moderately associated with lifting capacity (β=0.32, p=0.006), but not with any of the other functioning measures (β=−0.08 to 0.12, p>0.288). CONCLUSION: A higher level of maximal aerobic capacity is moderately associated with a higher lifting capacity, but not with self-reported work ability, pain-related disability and physical functioning. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9137331/ /pubmed/35692438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001253 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Vermue, Daniël J
Dol, Max V
Ansuategui Echeita, Jone
Dekker, Rienk
Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R
Reneman, Michiel F
Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title_full Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title_short Maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
title_sort maximal aerobic capacity is associated with lifting capacity, but not with self-reported functioning measures in patients with primary chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001253
work_keys_str_mv AT vermuedanielj maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT dolmaxv maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT ansuateguiecheitajone maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT dekkerrienk maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT schiphorstpreuperhenricar maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT renemanmichielf maximalaerobiccapacityisassociatedwithliftingcapacitybutnotwithselfreportedfunctioningmeasuresinpatientswithprimarychroniclowbackpainacrosssectionalstudy