Cargando…

Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review

Only a few studies have assessed smell and taste in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with psychophysical tests, while the majority performed self-rating evaluations. Given the heterogeneity of the published literature, the aim of this review was to systematically analyse the articles on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trecca, Eleonora M.C., Cassano, Michele, Longo, Francesco, Petrone, Paolo, Miani, Cesare, Hummel, Thomas, Gelardi, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763272
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-42-2022-03
_version_ 1784714366399021056
author Trecca, Eleonora M.C.
Cassano, Michele
Longo, Francesco
Petrone, Paolo
Miani, Cesare
Hummel, Thomas
Gelardi, Matteo
author_facet Trecca, Eleonora M.C.
Cassano, Michele
Longo, Francesco
Petrone, Paolo
Miani, Cesare
Hummel, Thomas
Gelardi, Matteo
author_sort Trecca, Eleonora M.C.
collection PubMed
description Only a few studies have assessed smell and taste in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with psychophysical tests, while the majority performed self-rating evaluations. Given the heterogeneity of the published literature, the aim of this review was to systematically analyse the articles on this topic with a focus on psychophysical testing. A search on PubMed and Web of Science from December 2019, to November 2021, with cross-references, was executed. The main eligibility criteria were English-language articles, investigating the clinical features of olfaction and gustation in COVID-19 patients using self-rating assessment, psychophysical testing and imaging techniques. A total of 638 articles were identified and 66 were included. Self-rating assessment was performed in 31 studies, while psychophysical testing in 30 and imaging techniques in 5. The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction was the most investigated topic, followed by the recovery time. About the psychophysical assessment, the extended version of the Sniffin’ Sticks was used in 11 articles and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test in another 11. The olfactory threshold performance was the most impacted compared to the discrimination and identification capacities in accordance with the hypothesis of a tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for the olfactory mucosa. The timing significantly influenced the results of the psychophysical testing with 20% of patients presenting olfactory dysfunction at one month after infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9137382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91373822022-06-01 Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review Trecca, Eleonora M.C. Cassano, Michele Longo, Francesco Petrone, Paolo Miani, Cesare Hummel, Thomas Gelardi, Matteo Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Review Only a few studies have assessed smell and taste in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with psychophysical tests, while the majority performed self-rating evaluations. Given the heterogeneity of the published literature, the aim of this review was to systematically analyse the articles on this topic with a focus on psychophysical testing. A search on PubMed and Web of Science from December 2019, to November 2021, with cross-references, was executed. The main eligibility criteria were English-language articles, investigating the clinical features of olfaction and gustation in COVID-19 patients using self-rating assessment, psychophysical testing and imaging techniques. A total of 638 articles were identified and 66 were included. Self-rating assessment was performed in 31 studies, while psychophysical testing in 30 and imaging techniques in 5. The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction was the most investigated topic, followed by the recovery time. About the psychophysical assessment, the extended version of the Sniffin’ Sticks was used in 11 articles and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test in another 11. The olfactory threshold performance was the most impacted compared to the discrimination and identification capacities in accordance with the hypothesis of a tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for the olfactory mucosa. The timing significantly influenced the results of the psychophysical testing with 20% of patients presenting olfactory dysfunction at one month after infection. Pacini Editore Srl 2022-04-26 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9137382/ /pubmed/35763272 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-42-2022-03 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
spellingShingle Review
Trecca, Eleonora M.C.
Cassano, Michele
Longo, Francesco
Petrone, Paolo
Miani, Cesare
Hummel, Thomas
Gelardi, Matteo
Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title_full Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title_fullStr Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title_full_unstemmed Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title_short Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
title_sort results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of sars-cov-2 infection: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9137382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763272
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-42-2022-03
work_keys_str_mv AT treccaeleonoramc resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT cassanomichele resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT longofrancesco resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT petronepaolo resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT mianicesare resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT hummelthomas resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview
AT gelardimatteo resultsfrompsychophysicaltestsofsmellandtasteduringthecourseofsarscov2infectionareview