Cargando…

Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirovnik, Janja, Riber, Anja B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276
_version_ 1784714526867849216
author Sirovnik, Janja
Riber, Anja B.
author_facet Sirovnik, Janja
Riber, Anja B.
author_sort Sirovnik, Janja
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefits include a reduction of costs for heating in the first weeks of life, and in adult layers, they improve the total egg production and may reduce floor egg laying. Despite the well-accepted knowledge of the positive effects of dark brooders on the prevention of injurious pecking, few farmers actually use them in their rearing facilities. In this paper, we review the effects of dark brooders on the welfare of pullets and layers and discuss the factors that likely contribute to their low usage in commercial systems, including the lack of commercially available brooder options and the size of the brooders, as well as the lack of information on the direct economic aspects. ABSTRACT: Dark brooders, i.e., horizontal heating elements for chicks equipped with curtains, mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark area for chicks to rest. Thus, they can be considered as artificial passive replacements of a mother hen. Despite their advantages in animal welfare and the likely positive outcomes in production and economy, dark brooders are rarely used in commercial layer pullet facilities. The main positive effect on welfare is a reduction of injurious pecking during the rearing and laying periods, which results in improved feather cover and reduced skin injuries and mortality due to cannibalism. Other welfare benefits include improved rest in dark-brooded chicks and reduced fearfulness at all ages tested (i.e., from 4 to 26 weeks). The impact on production and economy is seen in a reduction of the energy costs in the first weeks of life due to radiant heating, as well as improved total egg production and reduced floor egg laying. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature on the effects of dark brooders on injurious pecking and other welfare issues in layers, including speculations on the possible explanations for improved welfare. We also discuss the possible reasons for why dark brooders are not applied more commonly in commercial practice, including insufficient information on the economic aspects of using brooders and the lack of commercially available brooder options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9138035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91380352022-05-28 Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets Sirovnik, Janja Riber, Anja B. Animals (Basel) Commentary SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefits include a reduction of costs for heating in the first weeks of life, and in adult layers, they improve the total egg production and may reduce floor egg laying. Despite the well-accepted knowledge of the positive effects of dark brooders on the prevention of injurious pecking, few farmers actually use them in their rearing facilities. In this paper, we review the effects of dark brooders on the welfare of pullets and layers and discuss the factors that likely contribute to their low usage in commercial systems, including the lack of commercially available brooder options and the size of the brooders, as well as the lack of information on the direct economic aspects. ABSTRACT: Dark brooders, i.e., horizontal heating elements for chicks equipped with curtains, mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark area for chicks to rest. Thus, they can be considered as artificial passive replacements of a mother hen. Despite their advantages in animal welfare and the likely positive outcomes in production and economy, dark brooders are rarely used in commercial layer pullet facilities. The main positive effect on welfare is a reduction of injurious pecking during the rearing and laying periods, which results in improved feather cover and reduced skin injuries and mortality due to cannibalism. Other welfare benefits include improved rest in dark-brooded chicks and reduced fearfulness at all ages tested (i.e., from 4 to 26 weeks). The impact on production and economy is seen in a reduction of the energy costs in the first weeks of life due to radiant heating, as well as improved total egg production and reduced floor egg laying. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature on the effects of dark brooders on injurious pecking and other welfare issues in layers, including speculations on the possible explanations for improved welfare. We also discuss the possible reasons for why dark brooders are not applied more commonly in commercial practice, including insufficient information on the economic aspects of using brooders and the lack of commercially available brooder options. MDPI 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9138035/ /pubmed/35625122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Sirovnik, Janja
Riber, Anja B.
Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title_full Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title_fullStr Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title_full_unstemmed Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title_short Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
title_sort why-oh-why? dark brooders reduce injurious pecking, though are still not widely used in commercial rearing of layer pullets
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276
work_keys_str_mv AT sirovnikjanja whyohwhydarkbroodersreduceinjuriouspeckingthougharestillnotwidelyusedincommercialrearingoflayerpullets
AT riberanjab whyohwhydarkbroodersreduceinjuriouspeckingthougharestillnotwidelyusedincommercialrearingoflayerpullets