Cargando…
Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefit...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276 |
_version_ | 1784714526867849216 |
---|---|
author | Sirovnik, Janja Riber, Anja B. |
author_facet | Sirovnik, Janja Riber, Anja B. |
author_sort | Sirovnik, Janja |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefits include a reduction of costs for heating in the first weeks of life, and in adult layers, they improve the total egg production and may reduce floor egg laying. Despite the well-accepted knowledge of the positive effects of dark brooders on the prevention of injurious pecking, few farmers actually use them in their rearing facilities. In this paper, we review the effects of dark brooders on the welfare of pullets and layers and discuss the factors that likely contribute to their low usage in commercial systems, including the lack of commercially available brooder options and the size of the brooders, as well as the lack of information on the direct economic aspects. ABSTRACT: Dark brooders, i.e., horizontal heating elements for chicks equipped with curtains, mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark area for chicks to rest. Thus, they can be considered as artificial passive replacements of a mother hen. Despite their advantages in animal welfare and the likely positive outcomes in production and economy, dark brooders are rarely used in commercial layer pullet facilities. The main positive effect on welfare is a reduction of injurious pecking during the rearing and laying periods, which results in improved feather cover and reduced skin injuries and mortality due to cannibalism. Other welfare benefits include improved rest in dark-brooded chicks and reduced fearfulness at all ages tested (i.e., from 4 to 26 weeks). The impact on production and economy is seen in a reduction of the energy costs in the first weeks of life due to radiant heating, as well as improved total egg production and reduced floor egg laying. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature on the effects of dark brooders on injurious pecking and other welfare issues in layers, including speculations on the possible explanations for improved welfare. We also discuss the possible reasons for why dark brooders are not applied more commonly in commercial practice, including insufficient information on the economic aspects of using brooders and the lack of commercially available brooder options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9138035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91380352022-05-28 Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets Sirovnik, Janja Riber, Anja B. Animals (Basel) Commentary SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dark brooders mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark resting area. Dark brooders have a long-lasting reducing effect on injurious pecking, which improves feather cover and reduces mortality due to cannibalism into adulthood. The economic benefits include a reduction of costs for heating in the first weeks of life, and in adult layers, they improve the total egg production and may reduce floor egg laying. Despite the well-accepted knowledge of the positive effects of dark brooders on the prevention of injurious pecking, few farmers actually use them in their rearing facilities. In this paper, we review the effects of dark brooders on the welfare of pullets and layers and discuss the factors that likely contribute to their low usage in commercial systems, including the lack of commercially available brooder options and the size of the brooders, as well as the lack of information on the direct economic aspects. ABSTRACT: Dark brooders, i.e., horizontal heating elements for chicks equipped with curtains, mimic some aspects of maternal care, such as the provision of heat and a dark area for chicks to rest. Thus, they can be considered as artificial passive replacements of a mother hen. Despite their advantages in animal welfare and the likely positive outcomes in production and economy, dark brooders are rarely used in commercial layer pullet facilities. The main positive effect on welfare is a reduction of injurious pecking during the rearing and laying periods, which results in improved feather cover and reduced skin injuries and mortality due to cannibalism. Other welfare benefits include improved rest in dark-brooded chicks and reduced fearfulness at all ages tested (i.e., from 4 to 26 weeks). The impact on production and economy is seen in a reduction of the energy costs in the first weeks of life due to radiant heating, as well as improved total egg production and reduced floor egg laying. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature on the effects of dark brooders on injurious pecking and other welfare issues in layers, including speculations on the possible explanations for improved welfare. We also discuss the possible reasons for why dark brooders are not applied more commonly in commercial practice, including insufficient information on the economic aspects of using brooders and the lack of commercially available brooder options. MDPI 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9138035/ /pubmed/35625122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Sirovnik, Janja Riber, Anja B. Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title | Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title_full | Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title_fullStr | Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title_full_unstemmed | Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title_short | Why-Oh-Why? Dark Brooders Reduce Injurious Pecking, Though Are Still Not Widely Used in Commercial Rearing of Layer Pullets |
title_sort | why-oh-why? dark brooders reduce injurious pecking, though are still not widely used in commercial rearing of layer pullets |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12101276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sirovnikjanja whyohwhydarkbroodersreduceinjuriouspeckingthougharestillnotwidelyusedincommercialrearingoflayerpullets AT riberanjab whyohwhydarkbroodersreduceinjuriouspeckingthougharestillnotwidelyusedincommercialrearingoflayerpullets |