Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

The objectives of this review were to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical acceleration methods and the side effects associated with these methods. Nine databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen, Hajeer, Mohammad Y, Burhan, Ahmad S, Mahaini, Luai, Darwich, Khaldoun, Aljabban, Ossama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651986
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25381
_version_ 1784714616639586304
author Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen
Hajeer, Mohammad Y
Burhan, Ahmad S
Mahaini, Luai
Darwich, Khaldoun
Aljabban, Ossama
author_facet Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen
Hajeer, Mohammad Y
Burhan, Ahmad S
Mahaini, Luai
Darwich, Khaldoun
Aljabban, Ossama
author_sort Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this review were to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical acceleration methods and the side effects associated with these methods. Nine databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(®), Scopus(®), PubMed(®), Web of Science™, Google™ Scholar, Trip, OpenGrey, and PQDT OPEN from pro-Quest(®). ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (ICTRP) were screened to explore ongoing studies and unpublished literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of patients who received surgical interventions (invasive or minimally invasive techniques) in conjunction with traditional fixed appliances and who were compared to the non-surgical interventions, were included. The Cochrane tool for risk of bias (RoB.2) was used for evaluating RCTs, whereas the ROBINS-I tool was used for the CCTs. This systematic review included four RCTs and two CCTs (154 patients). The surgical and non-surgical interventions were found to have the same effect on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) accelerating in four trials. In contrast, the surgical interventions were superior in the other two studies. High heterogeneity among the included studies prevented conducting the quantitative synthesis of the findings. The reported side effects related to the surgical and non-surgical interventions were similar. A "very low" to "low" evidence indicates that the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement is similar, with no differences in the associated side effects. More high-quality clinical trials to compare the acceleration effectiveness between both modalities in different types of malocclusion is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9138402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91384022022-05-31 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen Hajeer, Mohammad Y Burhan, Ahmad S Mahaini, Luai Darwich, Khaldoun Aljabban, Ossama Cureus Dentistry The objectives of this review were to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical acceleration methods and the side effects associated with these methods. Nine databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(®), Scopus(®), PubMed(®), Web of Science™, Google™ Scholar, Trip, OpenGrey, and PQDT OPEN from pro-Quest(®). ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (ICTRP) were screened to explore ongoing studies and unpublished literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of patients who received surgical interventions (invasive or minimally invasive techniques) in conjunction with traditional fixed appliances and who were compared to the non-surgical interventions, were included. The Cochrane tool for risk of bias (RoB.2) was used for evaluating RCTs, whereas the ROBINS-I tool was used for the CCTs. This systematic review included four RCTs and two CCTs (154 patients). The surgical and non-surgical interventions were found to have the same effect on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) accelerating in four trials. In contrast, the surgical interventions were superior in the other two studies. High heterogeneity among the included studies prevented conducting the quantitative synthesis of the findings. The reported side effects related to the surgical and non-surgical interventions were similar. A "very low" to "low" evidence indicates that the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement is similar, with no differences in the associated side effects. More high-quality clinical trials to compare the acceleration effectiveness between both modalities in different types of malocclusion is required. Cureus 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9138402/ /pubmed/35651986 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25381 Text en Copyright © 2022, Alfailany et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Alfailany, Doa'a Tahseen
Hajeer, Mohammad Y
Burhan, Ahmad S
Mahaini, Luai
Darwich, Khaldoun
Aljabban, Ossama
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical interventions versus non-surgical ones when used in conjunction with fixed appliances to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651986
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25381
work_keys_str_mv AT alfailanydoaatahseen evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview
AT hajeermohammady evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview
AT burhanahmads evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview
AT mahainiluai evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview
AT darwichkhaldoun evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview
AT aljabbanossama evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalinterventionsversusnonsurgicaloneswhenusedinconjunctionwithfixedappliancestoaccelerateorthodontictoothmovementasystematicreview