Cargando…

Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia

INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuhas, Maryam, Hedrick, Valisa, Zoellner, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The University of Kentucky 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770211
http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07
_version_ 1784714697687171072
author Yuhas, Maryam
Hedrick, Valisa
Zoellner, Jamie
author_facet Yuhas, Maryam
Hedrick, Valisa
Zoellner, Jamie
author_sort Yuhas, Maryam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the top food and beverage sources of added sugar and to examine variations by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a randomized-controlled trial to reduce SSB in eight rural Appalachian counties. Data were obtained from baseline demographic surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary analyses included deriving AS grams and percentage of total energy intake from added sugar from individual food categories. RESULTS: This study had 301 participants, of which 93% were White (non-Hispanic), 81% were female, 49% were aged 35 to 54 years, 43% had an income of ≤$14,000, 33% had low health literacy, and 32% had < college education. Males and those with an income of ≤$14,000 had significantly higher consumption of added sugar. Added sugar contributed to 21% of total energy intake. The top source of added sugar was soda. SSB contributed to 66% of added sugar and 14% of total energy intake. Within SSB, soda contributed to 40% of added sugar, and 8% of total energy intake. Cola and citrus flavored drinks were the main varieties consumed. IMPLICATIONS: Study findings can be used to adapt evidence-based interventions to reflect commonly consumed food and beverages and help inform food- and beverage-based dietary guidelines and policies specific to rural populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9138752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The University of Kentucky
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91387522022-06-28 Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia Yuhas, Maryam Hedrick, Valisa Zoellner, Jamie J Appalach Health Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the top food and beverage sources of added sugar and to examine variations by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a randomized-controlled trial to reduce SSB in eight rural Appalachian counties. Data were obtained from baseline demographic surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary analyses included deriving AS grams and percentage of total energy intake from added sugar from individual food categories. RESULTS: This study had 301 participants, of which 93% were White (non-Hispanic), 81% were female, 49% were aged 35 to 54 years, 43% had an income of ≤$14,000, 33% had low health literacy, and 32% had < college education. Males and those with an income of ≤$14,000 had significantly higher consumption of added sugar. Added sugar contributed to 21% of total energy intake. The top source of added sugar was soda. SSB contributed to 66% of added sugar and 14% of total energy intake. Within SSB, soda contributed to 40% of added sugar, and 8% of total energy intake. Cola and citrus flavored drinks were the main varieties consumed. IMPLICATIONS: Study findings can be used to adapt evidence-based interventions to reflect commonly consumed food and beverages and help inform food- and beverage-based dietary guidelines and policies specific to rural populations. The University of Kentucky 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9138752/ /pubmed/35770211 http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07 Text en Copyright © 2020 Maryam Yuhas, Valisa Hedrick, and Jamie Zoellner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Yuhas, Maryam
Hedrick, Valisa
Zoellner, Jamie
Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title_full Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title_fullStr Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title_full_unstemmed Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title_short Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
title_sort consumption of added sugars by rural residents of southwest virginia
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770211
http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhasmaryam consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia
AT hedrickvalisa consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia
AT zoellnerjamie consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia