Cargando…
Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia
INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The University of Kentucky
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770211 http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07 |
_version_ | 1784714697687171072 |
---|---|
author | Yuhas, Maryam Hedrick, Valisa Zoellner, Jamie |
author_facet | Yuhas, Maryam Hedrick, Valisa Zoellner, Jamie |
author_sort | Yuhas, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the top food and beverage sources of added sugar and to examine variations by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a randomized-controlled trial to reduce SSB in eight rural Appalachian counties. Data were obtained from baseline demographic surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary analyses included deriving AS grams and percentage of total energy intake from added sugar from individual food categories. RESULTS: This study had 301 participants, of which 93% were White (non-Hispanic), 81% were female, 49% were aged 35 to 54 years, 43% had an income of ≤$14,000, 33% had low health literacy, and 32% had < college education. Males and those with an income of ≤$14,000 had significantly higher consumption of added sugar. Added sugar contributed to 21% of total energy intake. The top source of added sugar was soda. SSB contributed to 66% of added sugar and 14% of total energy intake. Within SSB, soda contributed to 40% of added sugar, and 8% of total energy intake. Cola and citrus flavored drinks were the main varieties consumed. IMPLICATIONS: Study findings can be used to adapt evidence-based interventions to reflect commonly consumed food and beverages and help inform food- and beverage-based dietary guidelines and policies specific to rural populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9138752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The University of Kentucky |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91387522022-06-28 Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia Yuhas, Maryam Hedrick, Valisa Zoellner, Jamie J Appalach Health Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Nationally, rural residents have high consumption of added sugars, yet the top sources have not been explored. Characterizing added-sugar intake in high sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumers in rural areas is an important step to help inform interventions and policies. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the top food and beverage sources of added sugar and to examine variations by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a randomized-controlled trial to reduce SSB in eight rural Appalachian counties. Data were obtained from baseline demographic surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary analyses included deriving AS grams and percentage of total energy intake from added sugar from individual food categories. RESULTS: This study had 301 participants, of which 93% were White (non-Hispanic), 81% were female, 49% were aged 35 to 54 years, 43% had an income of ≤$14,000, 33% had low health literacy, and 32% had < college education. Males and those with an income of ≤$14,000 had significantly higher consumption of added sugar. Added sugar contributed to 21% of total energy intake. The top source of added sugar was soda. SSB contributed to 66% of added sugar and 14% of total energy intake. Within SSB, soda contributed to 40% of added sugar, and 8% of total energy intake. Cola and citrus flavored drinks were the main varieties consumed. IMPLICATIONS: Study findings can be used to adapt evidence-based interventions to reflect commonly consumed food and beverages and help inform food- and beverage-based dietary guidelines and policies specific to rural populations. The University of Kentucky 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9138752/ /pubmed/35770211 http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07 Text en Copyright © 2020 Maryam Yuhas, Valisa Hedrick, and Jamie Zoellner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Yuhas, Maryam Hedrick, Valisa Zoellner, Jamie Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title | Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title_full | Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title_fullStr | Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title_short | Consumption of Added Sugars by Rural Residents of Southwest Virginia |
title_sort | consumption of added sugars by rural residents of southwest virginia |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9138752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770211 http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/jah.0203.07 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhasmaryam consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia AT hedrickvalisa consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia AT zoellnerjamie consumptionofaddedsugarsbyruralresidentsofsouthwestvirginia |