Cargando…

Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams

INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trane, Kristin, Aasbrenn, Kristian, Rønningen, Martin, Odden, Sigrun, Lexén, Annika, Landheim, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651735
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011
_version_ 1784714793292136448
author Trane, Kristin
Aasbrenn, Kristian
Rønningen, Martin
Odden, Sigrun
Lexén, Annika
Landheim, Anne
author_facet Trane, Kristin
Aasbrenn, Kristian
Rønningen, Martin
Odden, Sigrun
Lexén, Annika
Landheim, Anne
author_sort Trane, Kristin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barriers that might reduce the potential for integrated care in the Norwegian system, as described by staff in FACT teams, and how they adjust their way of working to increase the opportunities for integration. METHODS: Online focus group interviews involving 35 staff members of five Norwegian FACT teams were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. The material was analysed using thematic text analysis. RESULTS: Six themes described the barriers to integrated care in the service system: fragmentation, different legislation and digital systems, challenges in collaboration, bureaucracy and limited opening hours. Three themes described adjustments in the teams’ way of working to enhance integration: working as the responsible co-ordinator, being a collaborator, and the only entry channel into the service system. CONCLUSION: The FACT team staff described several barriers to integration within the system. However, they made some adjustments in their way of working that might provide opportunities for integrated care within complex and fragmented service systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91391562022-05-31 Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams Trane, Kristin Aasbrenn, Kristian Rønningen, Martin Odden, Sigrun Lexén, Annika Landheim, Anne Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barriers that might reduce the potential for integrated care in the Norwegian system, as described by staff in FACT teams, and how they adjust their way of working to increase the opportunities for integration. METHODS: Online focus group interviews involving 35 staff members of five Norwegian FACT teams were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. The material was analysed using thematic text analysis. RESULTS: Six themes described the barriers to integrated care in the service system: fragmentation, different legislation and digital systems, challenges in collaboration, bureaucracy and limited opening hours. Three themes described adjustments in the teams’ way of working to enhance integration: working as the responsible co-ordinator, being a collaborator, and the only entry channel into the service system. CONCLUSION: The FACT team staff described several barriers to integration within the system. However, they made some adjustments in their way of working that might provide opportunities for integrated care within complex and fragmented service systems. Ubiquity Press 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9139156/ /pubmed/35651735 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Trane, Kristin
Aasbrenn, Kristian
Rønningen, Martin
Odden, Sigrun
Lexén, Annika
Landheim, Anne
Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title_full Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title_fullStr Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title_full_unstemmed Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title_short Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
title_sort integration of care in complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of staff in flexible assertive community treatment teams
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651735
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011
work_keys_str_mv AT tranekristin integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams
AT aasbrennkristian integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams
AT rønningenmartin integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams
AT oddensigrun integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams
AT lexenannika integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams
AT landheimanne integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams