Cargando…
Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams
INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651735 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011 |
_version_ | 1784714793292136448 |
---|---|
author | Trane, Kristin Aasbrenn, Kristian Rønningen, Martin Odden, Sigrun Lexén, Annika Landheim, Anne |
author_facet | Trane, Kristin Aasbrenn, Kristian Rønningen, Martin Odden, Sigrun Lexén, Annika Landheim, Anne |
author_sort | Trane, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barriers that might reduce the potential for integrated care in the Norwegian system, as described by staff in FACT teams, and how they adjust their way of working to increase the opportunities for integration. METHODS: Online focus group interviews involving 35 staff members of five Norwegian FACT teams were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. The material was analysed using thematic text analysis. RESULTS: Six themes described the barriers to integrated care in the service system: fragmentation, different legislation and digital systems, challenges in collaboration, bureaucracy and limited opening hours. Three themes described adjustments in the teams’ way of working to enhance integration: working as the responsible co-ordinator, being a collaborator, and the only entry channel into the service system. CONCLUSION: The FACT team staff described several barriers to integration within the system. However, they made some adjustments in their way of working that might provide opportunities for integrated care within complex and fragmented service systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91391562022-05-31 Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams Trane, Kristin Aasbrenn, Kristian Rønningen, Martin Odden, Sigrun Lexén, Annika Landheim, Anne Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: To provide more integrated care, several countries have implemented the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model. However, this model does not guarantee full integration, especially in complex and fragmented service systems like in Norway. Hence, we investigated which barriers that might reduce the potential for integrated care in the Norwegian system, as described by staff in FACT teams, and how they adjust their way of working to increase the opportunities for integration. METHODS: Online focus group interviews involving 35 staff members of five Norwegian FACT teams were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. The material was analysed using thematic text analysis. RESULTS: Six themes described the barriers to integrated care in the service system: fragmentation, different legislation and digital systems, challenges in collaboration, bureaucracy and limited opening hours. Three themes described adjustments in the teams’ way of working to enhance integration: working as the responsible co-ordinator, being a collaborator, and the only entry channel into the service system. CONCLUSION: The FACT team staff described several barriers to integration within the system. However, they made some adjustments in their way of working that might provide opportunities for integrated care within complex and fragmented service systems. Ubiquity Press 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9139156/ /pubmed/35651735 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Trane, Kristin Aasbrenn, Kristian Rønningen, Martin Odden, Sigrun Lexén, Annika Landheim, Anne Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title | Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title_full | Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title_fullStr | Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title_short | Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams |
title_sort | integration of care in complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of staff in flexible assertive community treatment teams |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651735 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tranekristin integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams AT aasbrennkristian integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams AT rønningenmartin integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams AT oddensigrun integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams AT lexenannika integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams AT landheimanne integrationofcareincomplexandfragmentedservicesystemsexperiencesofstaffinflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentteams |