Cargando…

De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review

Background: The long-term use of anti-TNF-α agents can lead to adverse effects, such as infections and immune-mediated cutaneous reactions. Whether de-escalation by dose reduction or interval lengthening reduces these adverse effects is uncertain. This systematic review aims to compare the incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouhuys, Marleen, Lexmond, Willem S., van Rheenen, Patrick F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051034
_version_ 1784714793774481408
author Bouhuys, Marleen
Lexmond, Willem S.
van Rheenen, Patrick F.
author_facet Bouhuys, Marleen
Lexmond, Willem S.
van Rheenen, Patrick F.
author_sort Bouhuys, Marleen
collection PubMed
description Background: The long-term use of anti-TNF-α agents can lead to adverse effects, such as infections and immune-mediated cutaneous reactions. Whether de-escalation by dose reduction or interval lengthening reduces these adverse effects is uncertain. This systematic review aims to compare the incidence of infections and skin manifestations after anti-TNF-α dose de-escalation with standard dosing. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 14 January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing anti-TNF-α de-escalation strategies with standard dosing among patients with inflammatory conditions, that report on infections, skin manifestations, or both, were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of bias tool (RCTs) or the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (non-RCTs). Results: Fourteen RCTs and six observational studies (or 2706 patients) were included. Eight RCTs had low risk of bias or some concerns. Four non-RCTs were of good methodological quality. The studies described patients with axial spondyloarthritis (8 studies, 780 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (7 studies, 1458 patients), psoriasis (3 studies, 332 patients), or inflammatory bowel disease (2 studies, 136 patients). De-escalation strategies included interval lengthening (12 studies, 1317 patients), dose reduction (6 studies, 1130 patients), or both (2 studies, 259 patients). Overall, the occurrence of infections and skin manifestations did not differ between standard treatment and de-escalation. The disappearance of infections or skin manifestations after de-escalation was only reported in two studies. The majority of studies focused on etanercept and adalimumab. Heterogeneity in reporting of infections and skin manifestations precluded meta-analysis. Conclusion: We found that anti-TNF-α de-escalation does not reduce infections or skin reactions. A de-escalation strategy should not be recommended for the sole purpose of reducing drug-related adverse effects. The meticulous documentation of adverse effects is recommended to further address this question. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021252977.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91391582022-05-28 De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review Bouhuys, Marleen Lexmond, Willem S. van Rheenen, Patrick F. Biomedicines Systematic Review Background: The long-term use of anti-TNF-α agents can lead to adverse effects, such as infections and immune-mediated cutaneous reactions. Whether de-escalation by dose reduction or interval lengthening reduces these adverse effects is uncertain. This systematic review aims to compare the incidence of infections and skin manifestations after anti-TNF-α dose de-escalation with standard dosing. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 14 January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing anti-TNF-α de-escalation strategies with standard dosing among patients with inflammatory conditions, that report on infections, skin manifestations, or both, were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of bias tool (RCTs) or the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (non-RCTs). Results: Fourteen RCTs and six observational studies (or 2706 patients) were included. Eight RCTs had low risk of bias or some concerns. Four non-RCTs were of good methodological quality. The studies described patients with axial spondyloarthritis (8 studies, 780 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (7 studies, 1458 patients), psoriasis (3 studies, 332 patients), or inflammatory bowel disease (2 studies, 136 patients). De-escalation strategies included interval lengthening (12 studies, 1317 patients), dose reduction (6 studies, 1130 patients), or both (2 studies, 259 patients). Overall, the occurrence of infections and skin manifestations did not differ between standard treatment and de-escalation. The disappearance of infections or skin manifestations after de-escalation was only reported in two studies. The majority of studies focused on etanercept and adalimumab. Heterogeneity in reporting of infections and skin manifestations precluded meta-analysis. Conclusion: We found that anti-TNF-α de-escalation does not reduce infections or skin reactions. A de-escalation strategy should not be recommended for the sole purpose of reducing drug-related adverse effects. The meticulous documentation of adverse effects is recommended to further address this question. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021252977. MDPI 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9139158/ /pubmed/35625771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051034 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bouhuys, Marleen
Lexmond, Willem S.
van Rheenen, Patrick F.
De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title_full De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title_short De-Escalation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents and Reduction in Adverse Effects: A Systematic Review
title_sort de-escalation of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents and reduction in adverse effects: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051034
work_keys_str_mv AT bouhuysmarleen deescalationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsandreductioninadverseeffectsasystematicreview
AT lexmondwillems deescalationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsandreductioninadverseeffectsasystematicreview
AT vanrheenenpatrickf deescalationofantitumornecrosisfactoralphaagentsandreductioninadverseeffectsasystematicreview