Cargando…
AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival
An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for prostate cancer detection and grading was developed for clinical diagnostics on biopsies. The study cohort included 4221 scanned slides from 872 biopsy sessions at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital during 2016–2017 and a subcohort of 126 patients trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051031 |
_version_ | 1784714813437378560 |
---|---|
author | Sandeman, Kevin Blom, Sami Koponen, Ville Manninen, Anniina Juhila, Juuso Rannikko, Antti Ropponen, Tuomas Mirtti, Tuomas |
author_facet | Sandeman, Kevin Blom, Sami Koponen, Ville Manninen, Anniina Juhila, Juuso Rannikko, Antti Ropponen, Tuomas Mirtti, Tuomas |
author_sort | Sandeman, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for prostate cancer detection and grading was developed for clinical diagnostics on biopsies. The study cohort included 4221 scanned slides from 872 biopsy sessions at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital during 2016–2017 and a subcohort of 126 patients treated by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) during 2016–2019. In the validation cohort (n = 391), the model detected cancer with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 98% (weighted kappa 0.96 compared with the pathologist’s diagnosis). Algorithm-based detection of the grade area recapitulated the pathologist’s grade group. The area of AI-detected cancer was associated with extra-prostatic extension (G5 OR: 48.52; 95% CI 1.11–8.33), seminal vesicle invasion (cribriform G4 OR: 2.46; 95% CI 0.15–1.7; G5 OR: 5.58; 95% CI 0.45–3.42), and lymph node involvement (cribriform G4 OR: 2.66; 95% CI 0.2–1.8; G5 OR: 4.09; 95% CI 0.22–3). Algorithm-detected grade group 3–5 prostate cancer depicted increased risk for biochemical recurrence compared with grade groups 1–2 (HR: 5.91; 95% CI 1.96–17.83). This study showed that a deep learning model not only can find and grade prostate cancer on biopsies comparably with pathologists but also can predict adverse staging and probability for recurrence after surgical treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91392412022-05-28 AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival Sandeman, Kevin Blom, Sami Koponen, Ville Manninen, Anniina Juhila, Juuso Rannikko, Antti Ropponen, Tuomas Mirtti, Tuomas Diagnostics (Basel) Article An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for prostate cancer detection and grading was developed for clinical diagnostics on biopsies. The study cohort included 4221 scanned slides from 872 biopsy sessions at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital during 2016–2017 and a subcohort of 126 patients treated by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) during 2016–2019. In the validation cohort (n = 391), the model detected cancer with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 98% (weighted kappa 0.96 compared with the pathologist’s diagnosis). Algorithm-based detection of the grade area recapitulated the pathologist’s grade group. The area of AI-detected cancer was associated with extra-prostatic extension (G5 OR: 48.52; 95% CI 1.11–8.33), seminal vesicle invasion (cribriform G4 OR: 2.46; 95% CI 0.15–1.7; G5 OR: 5.58; 95% CI 0.45–3.42), and lymph node involvement (cribriform G4 OR: 2.66; 95% CI 0.2–1.8; G5 OR: 4.09; 95% CI 0.22–3). Algorithm-detected grade group 3–5 prostate cancer depicted increased risk for biochemical recurrence compared with grade groups 1–2 (HR: 5.91; 95% CI 1.96–17.83). This study showed that a deep learning model not only can find and grade prostate cancer on biopsies comparably with pathologists but also can predict adverse staging and probability for recurrence after surgical treatment. MDPI 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9139241/ /pubmed/35626187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sandeman, Kevin Blom, Sami Koponen, Ville Manninen, Anniina Juhila, Juuso Rannikko, Antti Ropponen, Tuomas Mirtti, Tuomas AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title | AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title_full | AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title_fullStr | AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title_full_unstemmed | AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title_short | AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival |
title_sort | ai model for prostate biopsies predicts cancer survival |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandemankevin aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT blomsami aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT koponenville aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT manninenanniina aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT juhilajuuso aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT rannikkoantti aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT ropponentuomas aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival AT mirttituomas aimodelforprostatebiopsiespredictscancersurvival |