Cargando…
Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients
The aim of this monocentric, retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the status of osseous union in uni- and poly-segmental mandible reconstructions regarding conventional angle-stable manually bent osteosynthesis plates (Unilock 2.0 mm) versus titan laser-melted PSI patient-specific implant’s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050274 |
_version_ | 1784714845437820928 |
---|---|
author | Knitschke, Michael Sonnabend, Sophia Roller, Fritz Christian Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn Schmermund, Daniel Attia, Sameh Streckbein, Philipp Howaldt, Hans-Peter Böttger, Sebastian |
author_facet | Knitschke, Michael Sonnabend, Sophia Roller, Fritz Christian Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn Schmermund, Daniel Attia, Sameh Streckbein, Philipp Howaldt, Hans-Peter Böttger, Sebastian |
author_sort | Knitschke, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this monocentric, retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the status of osseous union in uni- and poly-segmental mandible reconstructions regarding conventional angle-stable manually bent osteosynthesis plates (Unilock 2.0 mm) versus titan laser-melted PSI patient-specific implant’s (PSI). The clinical impact of PSI’s high stiffness fixation methods on bone healing and regeneration is still not well addressed. The special interest was in evaluating the ossification of junctions between mandible and fibula and between osteotomized fibula free flap (FFF) segments. Panoramic radiograph (OPT), computed tomography (CT) scans, or cone-beam CTs (CBCT) of patients who underwent successful FFF for mandible reconstruction from January 2005 to December 2020 were analyzed. A total number of 89 cases (28 females (31.5%), 61 males (68.5%), mean age 58.2 ± 11.3 years, range: 22.8–82.7 years) fulfilled the chosen inclusion criteria for analysis (conventional: n = 44 vs. PSI: n = 45). The present study found an overall incomplete ossification (IOU) rate of 24.7% (conventional: 13.6% vs. PSI: 35.6%; p = 0.017) for mandible to fibula and intersegmental junctions. Between osteotomized FFF segments, an IOU rate of 16% was found in the PSI-group, while no IOU was recorded in the conventional group (p = 0.015). Significant differences were registered for IOU rates in poly-segmental (p = 0.041), and lateral (p = 0.016) mandibular reconstructions when PSI was used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified plate exposure and type of plate used as independent risk factors for IOU. Previous or adjuvant radiotherapy did not impact incomplete osseous union in the evaluated study sample. PSI is more rigid than bent mini-plates and shields functional mechanical stimuli, and is the main reason for increasing the rate of incomplete ossification. To enhance the functional stimulus for ossification it has to be discussed if patient-specific implants can be designed to be thinner, and should be divided into segmental plates. This directs chewing forces through the bone and improves physiological bone remodeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91393772022-05-28 Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients Knitschke, Michael Sonnabend, Sophia Roller, Fritz Christian Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn Schmermund, Daniel Attia, Sameh Streckbein, Philipp Howaldt, Hans-Peter Böttger, Sebastian Curr Oncol Article The aim of this monocentric, retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the status of osseous union in uni- and poly-segmental mandible reconstructions regarding conventional angle-stable manually bent osteosynthesis plates (Unilock 2.0 mm) versus titan laser-melted PSI patient-specific implant’s (PSI). The clinical impact of PSI’s high stiffness fixation methods on bone healing and regeneration is still not well addressed. The special interest was in evaluating the ossification of junctions between mandible and fibula and between osteotomized fibula free flap (FFF) segments. Panoramic radiograph (OPT), computed tomography (CT) scans, or cone-beam CTs (CBCT) of patients who underwent successful FFF for mandible reconstruction from January 2005 to December 2020 were analyzed. A total number of 89 cases (28 females (31.5%), 61 males (68.5%), mean age 58.2 ± 11.3 years, range: 22.8–82.7 years) fulfilled the chosen inclusion criteria for analysis (conventional: n = 44 vs. PSI: n = 45). The present study found an overall incomplete ossification (IOU) rate of 24.7% (conventional: 13.6% vs. PSI: 35.6%; p = 0.017) for mandible to fibula and intersegmental junctions. Between osteotomized FFF segments, an IOU rate of 16% was found in the PSI-group, while no IOU was recorded in the conventional group (p = 0.015). Significant differences were registered for IOU rates in poly-segmental (p = 0.041), and lateral (p = 0.016) mandibular reconstructions when PSI was used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified plate exposure and type of plate used as independent risk factors for IOU. Previous or adjuvant radiotherapy did not impact incomplete osseous union in the evaluated study sample. PSI is more rigid than bent mini-plates and shields functional mechanical stimuli, and is the main reason for increasing the rate of incomplete ossification. To enhance the functional stimulus for ossification it has to be discussed if patient-specific implants can be designed to be thinner, and should be divided into segmental plates. This directs chewing forces through the bone and improves physiological bone remodeling. MDPI 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9139377/ /pubmed/35621664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050274 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Knitschke, Michael Sonnabend, Sophia Roller, Fritz Christian Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn Schmermund, Daniel Attia, Sameh Streckbein, Philipp Howaldt, Hans-Peter Böttger, Sebastian Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title | Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title_full | Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title_fullStr | Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title_short | Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients |
title_sort | osseous union after mandible reconstruction with fibula free flap using manually bent plates vs. patient-specific implants: a retrospective analysis of 89 patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knitschkemichael osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT sonnabendsophia osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT rollerfritzchristian osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT ponskuhnemannjorn osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT schmermunddaniel osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT attiasameh osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT streckbeinphilipp osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT howaldthanspeter osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients AT bottgersebastian osseousunionaftermandiblereconstructionwithfibulafreeflapusingmanuallybentplatesvspatientspecificimplantsaretrospectiveanalysisof89patients |