Cargando…

Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022

Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is crucial to neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation because respiratory failure precedes cardiac failure in newborns affected by perinatal asphyxia. Prolonged ineffective PPV could lead to a need for advanced resuscitation such as intubation, chest compression, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mani, Srinivasan, Pinheiro, Joaquim M. B., Rawat, Munmun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9050733
_version_ 1784714846173921280
author Mani, Srinivasan
Pinheiro, Joaquim M. B.
Rawat, Munmun
author_facet Mani, Srinivasan
Pinheiro, Joaquim M. B.
Rawat, Munmun
author_sort Mani, Srinivasan
collection PubMed
description Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is crucial to neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation because respiratory failure precedes cardiac failure in newborns affected by perinatal asphyxia. Prolonged ineffective PPV could lead to a need for advanced resuscitation such as intubation, chest compression, and epinephrine. Every 30 s delay in initiation of PPV increased the risk of death or morbidity by 16%. The most effective interface for providing PPV in the early phases of resuscitation is still unclear. Laryngeal masks (LMs) are supraglottic airway devices that provide less invasive and relatively stable airway access without the need for laryngoscopy which have been studied as an alternative to face masks and endotracheal tubes in the initial stages of neonatal resuscitation. A meta-analysis found that LM is a safe and more effective alternative to face mask ventilation in neonatal resuscitation. LM is recommended as an alternative secondary airway device for the resuscitation of infants > 34 weeks by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It is adopted by various national neonatal resuscitation guidelines across the globe. Recent good-quality randomized trials have enhanced our understanding of the utility of laryngeal masks in low-resource settings. Nevertheless, LM is underutilized due to its variable availability in delivery rooms, providers’ limited experience, insufficient training, preference for endotracheal tube, and lack of awareness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91393802022-05-28 Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022 Mani, Srinivasan Pinheiro, Joaquim M. B. Rawat, Munmun Children (Basel) Review Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is crucial to neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation because respiratory failure precedes cardiac failure in newborns affected by perinatal asphyxia. Prolonged ineffective PPV could lead to a need for advanced resuscitation such as intubation, chest compression, and epinephrine. Every 30 s delay in initiation of PPV increased the risk of death or morbidity by 16%. The most effective interface for providing PPV in the early phases of resuscitation is still unclear. Laryngeal masks (LMs) are supraglottic airway devices that provide less invasive and relatively stable airway access without the need for laryngoscopy which have been studied as an alternative to face masks and endotracheal tubes in the initial stages of neonatal resuscitation. A meta-analysis found that LM is a safe and more effective alternative to face mask ventilation in neonatal resuscitation. LM is recommended as an alternative secondary airway device for the resuscitation of infants > 34 weeks by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It is adopted by various national neonatal resuscitation guidelines across the globe. Recent good-quality randomized trials have enhanced our understanding of the utility of laryngeal masks in low-resource settings. Nevertheless, LM is underutilized due to its variable availability in delivery rooms, providers’ limited experience, insufficient training, preference for endotracheal tube, and lack of awareness. MDPI 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9139380/ /pubmed/35626910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9050733 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mani, Srinivasan
Pinheiro, Joaquim M. B.
Rawat, Munmun
Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title_full Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title_fullStr Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title_full_unstemmed Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title_short Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022
title_sort laryngeal masks in neonatal resuscitation—a narrative review of updates 2022
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626910
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9050733
work_keys_str_mv AT manisrinivasan laryngealmasksinneonatalresuscitationanarrativereviewofupdates2022
AT pinheirojoaquimmb laryngealmasksinneonatalresuscitationanarrativereviewofupdates2022
AT rawatmunmun laryngealmasksinneonatalresuscitationanarrativereviewofupdates2022