Cargando…

Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance

A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lübke, Katrin T., Blum, Tobias C., Pause, Bettina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644
_version_ 1784714850569551872
author Lübke, Katrin T.
Blum, Tobias C.
Pause, Bettina M.
author_facet Lübke, Katrin T.
Blum, Tobias C.
Pause, Bettina M.
author_sort Lübke, Katrin T.
collection PubMed
description A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (RMET). Here, the participants have to infer other persons’ mental state from photographs of eye regions. Odor discrimination was assessed using the “Düsseldorf Odour Discrimination Test” (DODT). The DODT consists of 15 items, each containing mixtures of four monomolecular substances. Within each item, two bottles contain the same mixing ratio, while the third contains the reversed mixing ratio. The participants had to identify the deviating odor. Women’s expertise in mentalizing (RMET score) is strongly related to olfactory discrimination performance (DODT score): The better women are in mentalizing, the better their performance in olfactory discrimination (rho = 0.572, p = 0.042, Bonferroni-corrected). Men’s mentalizing capability was unrelated to olfactory discrimination (rho = −0.117, p > 0.999, Bonferroni-corrected). The current results suggest that the social skill of mentalizing might underly the link between olfaction and social integration, at least in women, and are discussed with regard to the social nature of human olfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91393982022-05-28 Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance Lübke, Katrin T. Blum, Tobias C. Pause, Bettina M. Brain Sci Article A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (RMET). Here, the participants have to infer other persons’ mental state from photographs of eye regions. Odor discrimination was assessed using the “Düsseldorf Odour Discrimination Test” (DODT). The DODT consists of 15 items, each containing mixtures of four monomolecular substances. Within each item, two bottles contain the same mixing ratio, while the third contains the reversed mixing ratio. The participants had to identify the deviating odor. Women’s expertise in mentalizing (RMET score) is strongly related to olfactory discrimination performance (DODT score): The better women are in mentalizing, the better their performance in olfactory discrimination (rho = 0.572, p = 0.042, Bonferroni-corrected). Men’s mentalizing capability was unrelated to olfactory discrimination (rho = −0.117, p > 0.999, Bonferroni-corrected). The current results suggest that the social skill of mentalizing might underly the link between olfaction and social integration, at least in women, and are discussed with regard to the social nature of human olfaction. MDPI 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9139398/ /pubmed/35625030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lübke, Katrin T.
Blum, Tobias C.
Pause, Bettina M.
Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title_full Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title_fullStr Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title_full_unstemmed Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title_short Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
title_sort reading the mind through the nose: mentalizing skills predict olfactory performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644
work_keys_str_mv AT lubkekatrint readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance
AT blumtobiasc readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance
AT pausebettinam readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance