Cargando…
Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance
A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644 |
_version_ | 1784714850569551872 |
---|---|
author | Lübke, Katrin T. Blum, Tobias C. Pause, Bettina M. |
author_facet | Lübke, Katrin T. Blum, Tobias C. Pause, Bettina M. |
author_sort | Lübke, Katrin T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (RMET). Here, the participants have to infer other persons’ mental state from photographs of eye regions. Odor discrimination was assessed using the “Düsseldorf Odour Discrimination Test” (DODT). The DODT consists of 15 items, each containing mixtures of four monomolecular substances. Within each item, two bottles contain the same mixing ratio, while the third contains the reversed mixing ratio. The participants had to identify the deviating odor. Women’s expertise in mentalizing (RMET score) is strongly related to olfactory discrimination performance (DODT score): The better women are in mentalizing, the better their performance in olfactory discrimination (rho = 0.572, p = 0.042, Bonferroni-corrected). Men’s mentalizing capability was unrelated to olfactory discrimination (rho = −0.117, p > 0.999, Bonferroni-corrected). The current results suggest that the social skill of mentalizing might underly the link between olfaction and social integration, at least in women, and are discussed with regard to the social nature of human olfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91393982022-05-28 Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance Lübke, Katrin T. Blum, Tobias C. Pause, Bettina M. Brain Sci Article A growing body of literature suggests a close link between olfaction and social expertise. The current study examines whether mentalizing skills are related to olfactory discrimination performance. In order to assess their mentalizing ability, 21 women and 20 men completed the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (RMET). Here, the participants have to infer other persons’ mental state from photographs of eye regions. Odor discrimination was assessed using the “Düsseldorf Odour Discrimination Test” (DODT). The DODT consists of 15 items, each containing mixtures of four monomolecular substances. Within each item, two bottles contain the same mixing ratio, while the third contains the reversed mixing ratio. The participants had to identify the deviating odor. Women’s expertise in mentalizing (RMET score) is strongly related to olfactory discrimination performance (DODT score): The better women are in mentalizing, the better their performance in olfactory discrimination (rho = 0.572, p = 0.042, Bonferroni-corrected). Men’s mentalizing capability was unrelated to olfactory discrimination (rho = −0.117, p > 0.999, Bonferroni-corrected). The current results suggest that the social skill of mentalizing might underly the link between olfaction and social integration, at least in women, and are discussed with regard to the social nature of human olfaction. MDPI 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9139398/ /pubmed/35625030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lübke, Katrin T. Blum, Tobias C. Pause, Bettina M. Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title | Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title_full | Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title_fullStr | Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title_short | Reading the Mind through the Nose: Mentalizing Skills Predict Olfactory Performance |
title_sort | reading the mind through the nose: mentalizing skills predict olfactory performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35625030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lubkekatrint readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance AT blumtobiasc readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance AT pausebettinam readingthemindthroughthenosementalizingskillspredictolfactoryperformance |