Cargando…

Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome

Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Anne, Thurman, Angela John, Sterling, Audra, Kover, Sara T., Finestack, Lizabeth, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth, Edgin, Jamie O., Drayton, Andrea, Fombonne, Eric, Abbeduto, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575
_version_ 1784714922092920832
author Hoffmann, Anne
Thurman, Angela John
Sterling, Audra
Kover, Sara T.
Finestack, Lizabeth
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Edgin, Jamie O.
Drayton, Andrea
Fombonne, Eric
Abbeduto, Leonard
author_facet Hoffmann, Anne
Thurman, Angela John
Sterling, Audra
Kover, Sara T.
Finestack, Lizabeth
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Edgin, Jamie O.
Drayton, Andrea
Fombonne, Eric
Abbeduto, Leonard
author_sort Hoffmann, Anne
collection PubMed
description Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized assessments. This study explored how a well-established ELS protocol can assess three types of linguistic self-repetition in three neurodevelopmental disabilities: fragile X syndrome (FXS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and Down syndrome (DS). We examined its ability to differentiate between these disorders, the relationships between repetitive language and other participant characteristics, and initial construct validity. We found that the groups with FXS and ASD differed significantly on each of the three repetitive language measure, and that the group with DS differed from either ASD or FXS on two. Cognitive ability was significantly related to phrase repetition in the group with ASD. When the groups were combined, there was evidence of convergent and divergent validity. This study extends previous research on ELS and supports its use as a means to characterize pragmatic language. It also provides information about the relationships between repetitive language and other phenotypic characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91397112022-05-28 Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome Hoffmann, Anne Thurman, Angela John Sterling, Audra Kover, Sara T. Finestack, Lizabeth Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Edgin, Jamie O. Drayton, Andrea Fombonne, Eric Abbeduto, Leonard Brain Sci Article Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized assessments. This study explored how a well-established ELS protocol can assess three types of linguistic self-repetition in three neurodevelopmental disabilities: fragile X syndrome (FXS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and Down syndrome (DS). We examined its ability to differentiate between these disorders, the relationships between repetitive language and other participant characteristics, and initial construct validity. We found that the groups with FXS and ASD differed significantly on each of the three repetitive language measure, and that the group with DS differed from either ASD or FXS on two. Cognitive ability was significantly related to phrase repetition in the group with ASD. When the groups were combined, there was evidence of convergent and divergent validity. This study extends previous research on ELS and supports its use as a means to characterize pragmatic language. It also provides information about the relationships between repetitive language and other phenotypic characteristics. MDPI 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9139711/ /pubmed/35624962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hoffmann, Anne
Thurman, Angela John
Sterling, Audra
Kover, Sara T.
Finestack, Lizabeth
Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth
Edgin, Jamie O.
Drayton, Andrea
Fombonne, Eric
Abbeduto, Leonard
Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title_full Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title_fullStr Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title_short Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
title_sort analysis of a repetitive language coding system: comparisons between fragile x syndrome, autism, and down syndrome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannanne analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT thurmanangelajohn analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT sterlingaudra analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT koversarat analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT finestacklizabeth analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT berrykraviselizabeth analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT edginjamieo analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT draytonandrea analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT fombonneeric analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome
AT abbedutoleonard analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome