Cargando…
Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome
Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575 |
_version_ | 1784714922092920832 |
---|---|
author | Hoffmann, Anne Thurman, Angela John Sterling, Audra Kover, Sara T. Finestack, Lizabeth Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Edgin, Jamie O. Drayton, Andrea Fombonne, Eric Abbeduto, Leonard |
author_facet | Hoffmann, Anne Thurman, Angela John Sterling, Audra Kover, Sara T. Finestack, Lizabeth Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Edgin, Jamie O. Drayton, Andrea Fombonne, Eric Abbeduto, Leonard |
author_sort | Hoffmann, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized assessments. This study explored how a well-established ELS protocol can assess three types of linguistic self-repetition in three neurodevelopmental disabilities: fragile X syndrome (FXS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and Down syndrome (DS). We examined its ability to differentiate between these disorders, the relationships between repetitive language and other participant characteristics, and initial construct validity. We found that the groups with FXS and ASD differed significantly on each of the three repetitive language measure, and that the group with DS differed from either ASD or FXS on two. Cognitive ability was significantly related to phrase repetition in the group with ASD. When the groups were combined, there was evidence of convergent and divergent validity. This study extends previous research on ELS and supports its use as a means to characterize pragmatic language. It also provides information about the relationships between repetitive language and other phenotypic characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91397112022-05-28 Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome Hoffmann, Anne Thurman, Angela John Sterling, Audra Kover, Sara T. Finestack, Lizabeth Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Edgin, Jamie O. Drayton, Andrea Fombonne, Eric Abbeduto, Leonard Brain Sci Article Expressive language sampling (ELS) is a frequently used tool for language analysis, as it can be used across widely ranging cognitive and language abilities. ELS can also evaluate pragmatic language, including excessive self-repetition, which is challenging to assess with traditional standardized assessments. This study explored how a well-established ELS protocol can assess three types of linguistic self-repetition in three neurodevelopmental disabilities: fragile X syndrome (FXS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and Down syndrome (DS). We examined its ability to differentiate between these disorders, the relationships between repetitive language and other participant characteristics, and initial construct validity. We found that the groups with FXS and ASD differed significantly on each of the three repetitive language measure, and that the group with DS differed from either ASD or FXS on two. Cognitive ability was significantly related to phrase repetition in the group with ASD. When the groups were combined, there was evidence of convergent and divergent validity. This study extends previous research on ELS and supports its use as a means to characterize pragmatic language. It also provides information about the relationships between repetitive language and other phenotypic characteristics. MDPI 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9139711/ /pubmed/35624962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hoffmann, Anne Thurman, Angela John Sterling, Audra Kover, Sara T. Finestack, Lizabeth Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Edgin, Jamie O. Drayton, Andrea Fombonne, Eric Abbeduto, Leonard Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title | Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title_full | Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title_fullStr | Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title_short | Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome |
title_sort | analysis of a repetitive language coding system: comparisons between fragile x syndrome, autism, and down syndrome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmannanne analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT thurmanangelajohn analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT sterlingaudra analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT koversarat analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT finestacklizabeth analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT berrykraviselizabeth analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT edginjamieo analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT draytonandrea analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT fombonneeric analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome AT abbedutoleonard analysisofarepetitivelanguagecodingsystemcomparisonsbetweenfragilexsyndromeautismanddownsyndrome |