Cargando…

Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baro, Valentina, Cerretti, Giulia, Todoverto, Michela, Della Puppa, Alessandro, Chioffi, Franco, Volpin, Francesco, Causin, Francesco, Busato, Fabio, Fiduccia, Pasquale, Landi, Andrea, d’Avella, Domenico, Zagonel, Vittorina, Denaro, Luca, Lombardi, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280
_version_ 1784714953948659712
author Baro, Valentina
Cerretti, Giulia
Todoverto, Michela
Della Puppa, Alessandro
Chioffi, Franco
Volpin, Francesco
Causin, Francesco
Busato, Fabio
Fiduccia, Pasquale
Landi, Andrea
d’Avella, Domenico
Zagonel, Vittorina
Denaro, Luca
Lombardi, Giuseppe
author_facet Baro, Valentina
Cerretti, Giulia
Todoverto, Michela
Della Puppa, Alessandro
Chioffi, Franco
Volpin, Francesco
Causin, Francesco
Busato, Fabio
Fiduccia, Pasquale
Landi, Andrea
d’Avella, Domenico
Zagonel, Vittorina
Denaro, Luca
Lombardi, Giuseppe
author_sort Baro, Valentina
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a treatment for this sub-entity, to improve patient survival. Chemoradiotherapy is a also safe and efficacy treatment in patients with multiple lesions. Survival advantages from extensive resection remain unclear. ABSTRACT: Glioblastomas with multiple foci at presentation (mGBMs) account for 2–35% of all GBMs. mGBMs have limited existing data and no standardized treatment. This study aims to determine their incidence, demographic and clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. We performed a monocentric retrospective study, reviewing patients treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Inclusion criteria were: new diagnosis of GBM and presence of multiple lesions on pre-treatment MRI. ECOG PS was used to evaluate clinical condition, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, and CTCAE v5.0 for treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of newly diagnosed mGBM was 7.2% and the study population consisted of 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, M:F ratio of 1.8:1, and a surgical approach was undertaken in 73 patients (mostly partial resection). MGMT was methylated in 47.5%, and 82 patients received active oncological treatment (65.9% radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT + TMZ)). The disease control rate with RT + TMZ was 63%. Median OS of the entire study population was 10.2 months (95% CI 6.6–13.8), and median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2–5.2). The ECOG PS, the extent of resection, and the RT + TMZ were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis for OS, but only the RT + TMZ was a significant independent OS predictor in the multivariate analysis (HR = 3.1, 95% IC 1.3–7.7, p = 0.014). The incidence of mGBM is not rare. RT + TMZ is confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for survival and a safe and effective treatment. When feasible, RT + TMZ should be considered as a possible first-line treatment. The role of the extent of resection is still unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91398392022-05-28 Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review Baro, Valentina Cerretti, Giulia Todoverto, Michela Della Puppa, Alessandro Chioffi, Franco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Francesco Busato, Fabio Fiduccia, Pasquale Landi, Andrea d’Avella, Domenico Zagonel, Vittorina Denaro, Luca Lombardi, Giuseppe Curr Oncol Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a treatment for this sub-entity, to improve patient survival. Chemoradiotherapy is a also safe and efficacy treatment in patients with multiple lesions. Survival advantages from extensive resection remain unclear. ABSTRACT: Glioblastomas with multiple foci at presentation (mGBMs) account for 2–35% of all GBMs. mGBMs have limited existing data and no standardized treatment. This study aims to determine their incidence, demographic and clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. We performed a monocentric retrospective study, reviewing patients treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Inclusion criteria were: new diagnosis of GBM and presence of multiple lesions on pre-treatment MRI. ECOG PS was used to evaluate clinical condition, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, and CTCAE v5.0 for treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of newly diagnosed mGBM was 7.2% and the study population consisted of 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, M:F ratio of 1.8:1, and a surgical approach was undertaken in 73 patients (mostly partial resection). MGMT was methylated in 47.5%, and 82 patients received active oncological treatment (65.9% radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT + TMZ)). The disease control rate with RT + TMZ was 63%. Median OS of the entire study population was 10.2 months (95% CI 6.6–13.8), and median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2–5.2). The ECOG PS, the extent of resection, and the RT + TMZ were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis for OS, but only the RT + TMZ was a significant independent OS predictor in the multivariate analysis (HR = 3.1, 95% IC 1.3–7.7, p = 0.014). The incidence of mGBM is not rare. RT + TMZ is confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for survival and a safe and effective treatment. When feasible, RT + TMZ should be considered as a possible first-line treatment. The role of the extent of resection is still unclear. MDPI 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9139839/ /pubmed/35621670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baro, Valentina
Cerretti, Giulia
Todoverto, Michela
Della Puppa, Alessandro
Chioffi, Franco
Volpin, Francesco
Causin, Francesco
Busato, Fabio
Fiduccia, Pasquale
Landi, Andrea
d’Avella, Domenico
Zagonel, Vittorina
Denaro, Luca
Lombardi, Giuseppe
Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title_full Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title_fullStr Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title_short Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
title_sort newly diagnosed multifocal gbm: a monocentric experience and literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280
work_keys_str_mv AT barovalentina newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT cerrettigiulia newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT todovertomichela newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT dellapuppaalessandro newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT chioffifranco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT volpinfrancesco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT causinfrancesco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT busatofabio newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT fiducciapasquale newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT landiandrea newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT davelladomenico newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT zagonelvittorina newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT denaroluca newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview
AT lombardigiuseppe newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview