Cargando…
Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280 |
_version_ | 1784714953948659712 |
---|---|
author | Baro, Valentina Cerretti, Giulia Todoverto, Michela Della Puppa, Alessandro Chioffi, Franco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Francesco Busato, Fabio Fiduccia, Pasquale Landi, Andrea d’Avella, Domenico Zagonel, Vittorina Denaro, Luca Lombardi, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Baro, Valentina Cerretti, Giulia Todoverto, Michela Della Puppa, Alessandro Chioffi, Franco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Francesco Busato, Fabio Fiduccia, Pasquale Landi, Andrea d’Avella, Domenico Zagonel, Vittorina Denaro, Luca Lombardi, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Baro, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a treatment for this sub-entity, to improve patient survival. Chemoradiotherapy is a also safe and efficacy treatment in patients with multiple lesions. Survival advantages from extensive resection remain unclear. ABSTRACT: Glioblastomas with multiple foci at presentation (mGBMs) account for 2–35% of all GBMs. mGBMs have limited existing data and no standardized treatment. This study aims to determine their incidence, demographic and clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. We performed a monocentric retrospective study, reviewing patients treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Inclusion criteria were: new diagnosis of GBM and presence of multiple lesions on pre-treatment MRI. ECOG PS was used to evaluate clinical condition, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, and CTCAE v5.0 for treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of newly diagnosed mGBM was 7.2% and the study population consisted of 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, M:F ratio of 1.8:1, and a surgical approach was undertaken in 73 patients (mostly partial resection). MGMT was methylated in 47.5%, and 82 patients received active oncological treatment (65.9% radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT + TMZ)). The disease control rate with RT + TMZ was 63%. Median OS of the entire study population was 10.2 months (95% CI 6.6–13.8), and median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2–5.2). The ECOG PS, the extent of resection, and the RT + TMZ were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis for OS, but only the RT + TMZ was a significant independent OS predictor in the multivariate analysis (HR = 3.1, 95% IC 1.3–7.7, p = 0.014). The incidence of mGBM is not rare. RT + TMZ is confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for survival and a safe and effective treatment. When feasible, RT + TMZ should be considered as a possible first-line treatment. The role of the extent of resection is still unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91398392022-05-28 Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review Baro, Valentina Cerretti, Giulia Todoverto, Michela Della Puppa, Alessandro Chioffi, Franco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Francesco Busato, Fabio Fiduccia, Pasquale Landi, Andrea d’Avella, Domenico Zagonel, Vittorina Denaro, Luca Lombardi, Giuseppe Curr Oncol Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. In a minority of cases, it presents with multiple lesions already at the time of diagnosis, affecting patients’ survival and treatment. Our retrospective study aims to increase the current understanding and define a treatment for this sub-entity, to improve patient survival. Chemoradiotherapy is a also safe and efficacy treatment in patients with multiple lesions. Survival advantages from extensive resection remain unclear. ABSTRACT: Glioblastomas with multiple foci at presentation (mGBMs) account for 2–35% of all GBMs. mGBMs have limited existing data and no standardized treatment. This study aims to determine their incidence, demographic and clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. We performed a monocentric retrospective study, reviewing patients treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Inclusion criteria were: new diagnosis of GBM and presence of multiple lesions on pre-treatment MRI. ECOG PS was used to evaluate clinical condition, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, and CTCAE v5.0 for treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of newly diagnosed mGBM was 7.2% and the study population consisted of 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, M:F ratio of 1.8:1, and a surgical approach was undertaken in 73 patients (mostly partial resection). MGMT was methylated in 47.5%, and 82 patients received active oncological treatment (65.9% radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT + TMZ)). The disease control rate with RT + TMZ was 63%. Median OS of the entire study population was 10.2 months (95% CI 6.6–13.8), and median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2–5.2). The ECOG PS, the extent of resection, and the RT + TMZ were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis for OS, but only the RT + TMZ was a significant independent OS predictor in the multivariate analysis (HR = 3.1, 95% IC 1.3–7.7, p = 0.014). The incidence of mGBM is not rare. RT + TMZ is confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for survival and a safe and effective treatment. When feasible, RT + TMZ should be considered as a possible first-line treatment. The role of the extent of resection is still unclear. MDPI 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9139839/ /pubmed/35621670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Baro, Valentina Cerretti, Giulia Todoverto, Michela Della Puppa, Alessandro Chioffi, Franco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Francesco Busato, Fabio Fiduccia, Pasquale Landi, Andrea d’Avella, Domenico Zagonel, Vittorina Denaro, Luca Lombardi, Giuseppe Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title | Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title_full | Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title_short | Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review |
title_sort | newly diagnosed multifocal gbm: a monocentric experience and literature review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barovalentina newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT cerrettigiulia newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT todovertomichela newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT dellapuppaalessandro newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT chioffifranco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT volpinfrancesco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT causinfrancesco newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT busatofabio newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT fiducciapasquale newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT landiandrea newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT davelladomenico newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT zagonelvittorina newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT denaroluca newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview AT lombardigiuseppe newlydiagnosedmultifocalgbmamonocentricexperienceandliteraturereview |