Cargando…

Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification

Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beukinga, Roelof J., Poelmann, Floris B., Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah, Viddeleer, Alain R., Boellaard, Ronald, de Haas, Robbert J., Plukker, John Th. M., Hulshoff, Jan Binne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070
_version_ 1784714972315516928
author Beukinga, Roelof J.
Poelmann, Floris B.
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Viddeleer, Alain R.
Boellaard, Ronald
de Haas, Robbert J.
Plukker, John Th. M.
Hulshoff, Jan Binne
author_facet Beukinga, Roelof J.
Poelmann, Floris B.
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Viddeleer, Alain R.
Boellaard, Ronald
de Haas, Robbert J.
Plukker, John Th. M.
Hulshoff, Jan Binne
author_sort Beukinga, Roelof J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143 (18)F-FDG PET radiomic features were extracted from 199 EC patients (T1N1-3M0/T2–4aN0-3M0) treated between 2009 and 2019. Non-response (n = 57; 29%) was defined as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 4–5 (n = 44; 22%) or interval progression (n = 13; 7%). Randomly, 139 patients (70%) were allocated to explore all combinations of 24 feature selection strategies and 6 classification methods towards the cross-validated average precision (AP). The predictive value of the best-performing model, i.e AP and area under the ROC curve analysis (AUC), was evaluated on an independent test subset of 60 patients (30%). Results: The best performing model had an AP (mean ± SD) of 0.47 ± 0.06 on the training subset, achieved by a support vector machine classifier trained on five principal components of relevant clinical and radiomic features. The model was externally validated with an AP of 0.66 and an AUC of 0.67. Conclusion: In the present study, the best-performing model on pre-treatment (18)F-FDG PET radiomics and clinical features had a small clinical benefit to identify non-responders to nCRT in EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91399152022-05-28 Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification Beukinga, Roelof J. Poelmann, Floris B. Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Viddeleer, Alain R. Boellaard, Ronald de Haas, Robbert J. Plukker, John Th. M. Hulshoff, Jan Binne Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143 (18)F-FDG PET radiomic features were extracted from 199 EC patients (T1N1-3M0/T2–4aN0-3M0) treated between 2009 and 2019. Non-response (n = 57; 29%) was defined as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 4–5 (n = 44; 22%) or interval progression (n = 13; 7%). Randomly, 139 patients (70%) were allocated to explore all combinations of 24 feature selection strategies and 6 classification methods towards the cross-validated average precision (AP). The predictive value of the best-performing model, i.e AP and area under the ROC curve analysis (AUC), was evaluated on an independent test subset of 60 patients (30%). Results: The best performing model had an AP (mean ± SD) of 0.47 ± 0.06 on the training subset, achieved by a support vector machine classifier trained on five principal components of relevant clinical and radiomic features. The model was externally validated with an AP of 0.66 and an AUC of 0.67. Conclusion: In the present study, the best-performing model on pre-treatment (18)F-FDG PET radiomics and clinical features had a small clinical benefit to identify non-responders to nCRT in EC. MDPI 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9139915/ /pubmed/35626225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beukinga, Roelof J.
Poelmann, Floris B.
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Viddeleer, Alain R.
Boellaard, Ronald
de Haas, Robbert J.
Plukker, John Th. M.
Hulshoff, Jan Binne
Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title_full Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title_fullStr Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title_short Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
title_sort prediction of non-response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients with (18)f-fdg pet radiomics based machine learning classification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070
work_keys_str_mv AT beukingaroelofj predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT poelmannflorisb predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT katsugurlugursah predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT viddeleeralainr predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT boellaardronald predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT dehaasrobbertj predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT plukkerjohnthm predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification
AT hulshoffjanbinne predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification