Cargando…
Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification
Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070 |
_version_ | 1784714972315516928 |
---|---|
author | Beukinga, Roelof J. Poelmann, Floris B. Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Viddeleer, Alain R. Boellaard, Ronald de Haas, Robbert J. Plukker, John Th. M. Hulshoff, Jan Binne |
author_facet | Beukinga, Roelof J. Poelmann, Floris B. Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Viddeleer, Alain R. Boellaard, Ronald de Haas, Robbert J. Plukker, John Th. M. Hulshoff, Jan Binne |
author_sort | Beukinga, Roelof J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143 (18)F-FDG PET radiomic features were extracted from 199 EC patients (T1N1-3M0/T2–4aN0-3M0) treated between 2009 and 2019. Non-response (n = 57; 29%) was defined as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 4–5 (n = 44; 22%) or interval progression (n = 13; 7%). Randomly, 139 patients (70%) were allocated to explore all combinations of 24 feature selection strategies and 6 classification methods towards the cross-validated average precision (AP). The predictive value of the best-performing model, i.e AP and area under the ROC curve analysis (AUC), was evaluated on an independent test subset of 60 patients (30%). Results: The best performing model had an AP (mean ± SD) of 0.47 ± 0.06 on the training subset, achieved by a support vector machine classifier trained on five principal components of relevant clinical and radiomic features. The model was externally validated with an AP of 0.66 and an AUC of 0.67. Conclusion: In the present study, the best-performing model on pre-treatment (18)F-FDG PET radiomics and clinical features had a small clinical benefit to identify non-responders to nCRT in EC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91399152022-05-28 Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification Beukinga, Roelof J. Poelmann, Floris B. Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Viddeleer, Alain R. Boellaard, Ronald de Haas, Robbert J. Plukker, John Th. M. Hulshoff, Jan Binne Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline (18)F-FDG PET. Methods: Retrospectively, 143 (18)F-FDG PET radiomic features were extracted from 199 EC patients (T1N1-3M0/T2–4aN0-3M0) treated between 2009 and 2019. Non-response (n = 57; 29%) was defined as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 4–5 (n = 44; 22%) or interval progression (n = 13; 7%). Randomly, 139 patients (70%) were allocated to explore all combinations of 24 feature selection strategies and 6 classification methods towards the cross-validated average precision (AP). The predictive value of the best-performing model, i.e AP and area under the ROC curve analysis (AUC), was evaluated on an independent test subset of 60 patients (30%). Results: The best performing model had an AP (mean ± SD) of 0.47 ± 0.06 on the training subset, achieved by a support vector machine classifier trained on five principal components of relevant clinical and radiomic features. The model was externally validated with an AP of 0.66 and an AUC of 0.67. Conclusion: In the present study, the best-performing model on pre-treatment (18)F-FDG PET radiomics and clinical features had a small clinical benefit to identify non-responders to nCRT in EC. MDPI 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9139915/ /pubmed/35626225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Beukinga, Roelof J. Poelmann, Floris B. Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Viddeleer, Alain R. Boellaard, Ronald de Haas, Robbert J. Plukker, John Th. M. Hulshoff, Jan Binne Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title | Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title_full | Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title_short | Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with (18)F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification |
title_sort | prediction of non-response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients with (18)f-fdg pet radiomics based machine learning classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beukingaroelofj predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT poelmannflorisb predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT katsugurlugursah predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT viddeleeralainr predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT boellaardronald predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT dehaasrobbertj predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT plukkerjohnthm predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification AT hulshoffjanbinne predictionofnonresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinesophagealcancerpatientswith18ffdgpetradiomicsbasedmachinelearningclassification |