Cargando…
The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302 |
_version_ | 1784714974461952000 |
---|---|
author | Maeda, Michihide Hisa, Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki, Shinya Lee, Misooja Mabuchi, Seiji Kamiura, Shoji |
author_facet | Maeda, Michihide Hisa, Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki, Shinya Lee, Misooja Mabuchi, Seiji Kamiura, Shoji |
author_sort | Maeda, Michihide |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the predictive value of surgeon volume and patient characteristics for laser vaporization outcomes in women with pathologically confirmed CIN2. Histologically confirmed CIN2 or higher grade after laser vaporization was defined as persistent or recurrent. Various patient characteristics were compared between women with and those without recurrence to examine the predictive factors for laser vaporization. There were 270 patients with a median age of 36 (18–60) years. The median follow-up period was 25 (6–75.5) months and the median period between treatment and persistence or recurrence was 17 (1.5–69) months. The median annual number of procedures for all seven surgeons was 7.8. There were 38 patients (14.1%) with persistent or recurrent lesions—24 had CIN2, 13 had CIN3, and one had adenocarcinoma in situ. Patient age, body mass index, surgeon volume, and history of prior CIN treatment or invasive cervical cancer were not significantly correlated with lesion persistence or recurrence. In conclusion, laser vaporization has comparable success rates and is a feasible treatment for both low- and high-volume surgeons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9139925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91399252022-05-28 The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Maeda, Michihide Hisa, Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki, Shinya Lee, Misooja Mabuchi, Seiji Kamiura, Shoji Curr Oncol Article Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the predictive value of surgeon volume and patient characteristics for laser vaporization outcomes in women with pathologically confirmed CIN2. Histologically confirmed CIN2 or higher grade after laser vaporization was defined as persistent or recurrent. Various patient characteristics were compared between women with and those without recurrence to examine the predictive factors for laser vaporization. There were 270 patients with a median age of 36 (18–60) years. The median follow-up period was 25 (6–75.5) months and the median period between treatment and persistence or recurrence was 17 (1.5–69) months. The median annual number of procedures for all seven surgeons was 7.8. There were 38 patients (14.1%) with persistent or recurrent lesions—24 had CIN2, 13 had CIN3, and one had adenocarcinoma in situ. Patient age, body mass index, surgeon volume, and history of prior CIN treatment or invasive cervical cancer were not significantly correlated with lesion persistence or recurrence. In conclusion, laser vaporization has comparable success rates and is a feasible treatment for both low- and high-volume surgeons. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9139925/ /pubmed/35621692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maeda, Michihide Hisa, Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki, Shinya Lee, Misooja Mabuchi, Seiji Kamiura, Shoji The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title | The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_full | The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_short | The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_sort | effect of surgeon volume on the outcome of laser vaporization: a single-center retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maedamichihide theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT hisatsuyoshi theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT matsuzakishinya theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT leemisooja theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT mabuchiseiji theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT kamiurashoji theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT maedamichihide effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT hisatsuyoshi effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT matsuzakishinya effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT leemisooja effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT mabuchiseiji effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT kamiurashoji effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |