Cargando…

The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeda, Michihide, Hisa, Tsuyoshi, Matsuzaki, Shinya, Lee, Misooja, Mabuchi, Seiji, Kamiura, Shoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302
_version_ 1784714974461952000
author Maeda, Michihide
Hisa, Tsuyoshi
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Lee, Misooja
Mabuchi, Seiji
Kamiura, Shoji
author_facet Maeda, Michihide
Hisa, Tsuyoshi
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Lee, Misooja
Mabuchi, Seiji
Kamiura, Shoji
author_sort Maeda, Michihide
collection PubMed
description Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the predictive value of surgeon volume and patient characteristics for laser vaporization outcomes in women with pathologically confirmed CIN2. Histologically confirmed CIN2 or higher grade after laser vaporization was defined as persistent or recurrent. Various patient characteristics were compared between women with and those without recurrence to examine the predictive factors for laser vaporization. There were 270 patients with a median age of 36 (18–60) years. The median follow-up period was 25 (6–75.5) months and the median period between treatment and persistence or recurrence was 17 (1.5–69) months. The median annual number of procedures for all seven surgeons was 7.8. There were 38 patients (14.1%) with persistent or recurrent lesions—24 had CIN2, 13 had CIN3, and one had adenocarcinoma in situ. Patient age, body mass index, surgeon volume, and history of prior CIN treatment or invasive cervical cancer were not significantly correlated with lesion persistence or recurrence. In conclusion, laser vaporization has comparable success rates and is a feasible treatment for both low- and high-volume surgeons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9139925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91399252022-05-28 The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Maeda, Michihide Hisa, Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki, Shinya Lee, Misooja Mabuchi, Seiji Kamiura, Shoji Curr Oncol Article Although laser vaporization is a popular minimally invasive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), factors influencing CIN recurrence are understudied. Moreover, the effect of surgeon volume on patients’ prognosis after laser vaporization for CIN is unknown. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the predictive value of surgeon volume and patient characteristics for laser vaporization outcomes in women with pathologically confirmed CIN2. Histologically confirmed CIN2 or higher grade after laser vaporization was defined as persistent or recurrent. Various patient characteristics were compared between women with and those without recurrence to examine the predictive factors for laser vaporization. There were 270 patients with a median age of 36 (18–60) years. The median follow-up period was 25 (6–75.5) months and the median period between treatment and persistence or recurrence was 17 (1.5–69) months. The median annual number of procedures for all seven surgeons was 7.8. There were 38 patients (14.1%) with persistent or recurrent lesions—24 had CIN2, 13 had CIN3, and one had adenocarcinoma in situ. Patient age, body mass index, surgeon volume, and history of prior CIN treatment or invasive cervical cancer were not significantly correlated with lesion persistence or recurrence. In conclusion, laser vaporization has comparable success rates and is a feasible treatment for both low- and high-volume surgeons. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9139925/ /pubmed/35621692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maeda, Michihide
Hisa, Tsuyoshi
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Lee, Misooja
Mabuchi, Seiji
Kamiura, Shoji
The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_short The Effect of Surgeon Volume on the Outcome of Laser Vaporization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_sort effect of surgeon volume on the outcome of laser vaporization: a single-center retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9139925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050302
work_keys_str_mv AT maedamichihide theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT hisatsuyoshi theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT matsuzakishinya theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT leemisooja theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT mabuchiseiji theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT kamiurashoji theeffectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT maedamichihide effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT hisatsuyoshi effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT matsuzakishinya effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT leemisooja effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT mabuchiseiji effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT kamiurashoji effectofsurgeonvolumeontheoutcomeoflaservaporizationasinglecenterretrospectivestudy