Cargando…

Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Treatment of metastasized or recurrent oral (OSCC) and oropharyngeal (OPSCC) squamous cell carcinoma remains challenging. Targeted antibody-based therapy inter alia for PD-1 / PD-L1 axis shows promising results, but whether PD-L1 expression varies between the subentities remains unclear. The express...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blatt, Sebastian, Krüger, Maximilian, Rump, Constantin, Zimmer, Stefanie, Sagheb, Keyvan, Künzel, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269136
_version_ 1784715059072598016
author Blatt, Sebastian
Krüger, Maximilian
Rump, Constantin
Zimmer, Stefanie
Sagheb, Keyvan
Künzel, Julian
author_facet Blatt, Sebastian
Krüger, Maximilian
Rump, Constantin
Zimmer, Stefanie
Sagheb, Keyvan
Künzel, Julian
author_sort Blatt, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Treatment of metastasized or recurrent oral (OSCC) and oropharyngeal (OPSCC) squamous cell carcinoma remains challenging. Targeted antibody-based therapy inter alia for PD-1 / PD-L1 axis shows promising results, but whether PD-L1 expression varies between the subentities remains unclear. The expression pattern of PD-L1 (EPR19759 antibody, Abcam, Berlin, Germany) and p16 (CINtech® Histology Kit, Ventana, Oro Valley, USA) was determined immunohistochemically and analyzed by HALO™ Image Analysis Software (Indica Lab, Albuquerque, USA). For PD-L1, combined positivity score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and histoscore, were assessed and results correlated with epidemiological data. In total, 161 patients (OSCC: n = 78, OPSCC: n = 83) were included. A mean of 43.6% (±34.0%) of the specimen showed increased PD-L1 expression that did not differ quantitatively between subentities (TPS: p = 0.159, CPS: p = 0.078), but qualitatively (histoscore: p = 0.003). In the mean follow-up period (45.6 months), contrary to age (p = 0.006) and advanced T-Status (p = 0.018), PD-L1 expression did not correlate with overall (OS, p = 0.191) and recurrence free survival (RFS: p = 0.193) in both subentities. No correlation of p16 and PD-L1 expression was found (p = 0.844). PD-L1 is differentially expressed between OSCC and OPSCC, however without influence on OS. Furthermore, p16 status was not related to PD-L1 expression. This may have implications for future (immune) therapeutical approaches for oral cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9140279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91402792022-05-28 Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Blatt, Sebastian Krüger, Maximilian Rump, Constantin Zimmer, Stefanie Sagheb, Keyvan Künzel, Julian PLoS One Research Article Treatment of metastasized or recurrent oral (OSCC) and oropharyngeal (OPSCC) squamous cell carcinoma remains challenging. Targeted antibody-based therapy inter alia for PD-1 / PD-L1 axis shows promising results, but whether PD-L1 expression varies between the subentities remains unclear. The expression pattern of PD-L1 (EPR19759 antibody, Abcam, Berlin, Germany) and p16 (CINtech® Histology Kit, Ventana, Oro Valley, USA) was determined immunohistochemically and analyzed by HALO™ Image Analysis Software (Indica Lab, Albuquerque, USA). For PD-L1, combined positivity score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and histoscore, were assessed and results correlated with epidemiological data. In total, 161 patients (OSCC: n = 78, OPSCC: n = 83) were included. A mean of 43.6% (±34.0%) of the specimen showed increased PD-L1 expression that did not differ quantitatively between subentities (TPS: p = 0.159, CPS: p = 0.078), but qualitatively (histoscore: p = 0.003). In the mean follow-up period (45.6 months), contrary to age (p = 0.006) and advanced T-Status (p = 0.018), PD-L1 expression did not correlate with overall (OS, p = 0.191) and recurrence free survival (RFS: p = 0.193) in both subentities. No correlation of p16 and PD-L1 expression was found (p = 0.844). PD-L1 is differentially expressed between OSCC and OPSCC, however without influence on OS. Furthermore, p16 status was not related to PD-L1 expression. This may have implications for future (immune) therapeutical approaches for oral cancer. Public Library of Science 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9140279/ /pubmed/35622885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269136 Text en © 2022 Blatt et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blatt, Sebastian
Krüger, Maximilian
Rump, Constantin
Zimmer, Stefanie
Sagheb, Keyvan
Künzel, Julian
Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Differences in PD-L1 Expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort differences in pd-l1 expression between oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269136
work_keys_str_mv AT blattsebastian differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT krugermaximilian differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT rumpconstantin differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zimmerstefanie differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT saghebkeyvan differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kunzeljulian differencesinpdl1expressionbetweenoralandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma