Cargando…
Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619 |
_version_ | 1784715126836822016 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Haijing Yan, Zaizai Jia, Junmei |
author_facet | Ma, Haijing Yan, Zaizai Jia, Junmei |
author_sort | Ma, Haijing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate of the reliability of the multicomponent stress–strength (MSS) model, in which the stress and the strength variables are derived from different distributions by assuming that stress follows the Chen distribution and that strength follows the Gompertz distribution. In the present study, the Newton–Raphson method was adopted to derive the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the model parameters, and the corresponding asymptotic distribution was adopted to construct the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI). Subsequently, the exact confidence interval (ECI) of the parameters was calculated. A hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was adopted to determine the approximate Bayesian estimation (BE) of the unknown parameters and the high posterior density credible interval (HPDCI). A simulation study with the actual dataset was conducted for the BEs with squared error loss function (SELF) and the MLEs of the model parameters and reliability, comparing the bias and mean squares errors (MSE). In addition, the three interval estimates were compared in terms of the average interval length (AIL) and coverage probability (CP). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9140556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91405562022-05-28 Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis Ma, Haijing Yan, Zaizai Jia, Junmei Entropy (Basel) Article The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate of the reliability of the multicomponent stress–strength (MSS) model, in which the stress and the strength variables are derived from different distributions by assuming that stress follows the Chen distribution and that strength follows the Gompertz distribution. In the present study, the Newton–Raphson method was adopted to derive the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the model parameters, and the corresponding asymptotic distribution was adopted to construct the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI). Subsequently, the exact confidence interval (ECI) of the parameters was calculated. A hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was adopted to determine the approximate Bayesian estimation (BE) of the unknown parameters and the high posterior density credible interval (HPDCI). A simulation study with the actual dataset was conducted for the BEs with squared error loss function (SELF) and the MLEs of the model parameters and reliability, comparing the bias and mean squares errors (MSE). In addition, the three interval estimates were compared in terms of the average interval length (AIL) and coverage probability (CP). MDPI 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9140556/ /pubmed/35626504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ma, Haijing Yan, Zaizai Jia, Junmei Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title | Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title_full | Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title_fullStr | Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title_short | Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis |
title_sort | multicomponent stress–strength model based on generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme: a statistical analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahaijing multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis AT yanzaizai multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis AT jiajunmei multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis |