Cargando…

Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis

The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Haijing, Yan, Zaizai, Jia, Junmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619
_version_ 1784715126836822016
author Ma, Haijing
Yan, Zaizai
Jia, Junmei
author_facet Ma, Haijing
Yan, Zaizai
Jia, Junmei
author_sort Ma, Haijing
collection PubMed
description The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate of the reliability of the multicomponent stress–strength (MSS) model, in which the stress and the strength variables are derived from different distributions by assuming that stress follows the Chen distribution and that strength follows the Gompertz distribution. In the present study, the Newton–Raphson method was adopted to derive the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the model parameters, and the corresponding asymptotic distribution was adopted to construct the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI). Subsequently, the exact confidence interval (ECI) of the parameters was calculated. A hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was adopted to determine the approximate Bayesian estimation (BE) of the unknown parameters and the high posterior density credible interval (HPDCI). A simulation study with the actual dataset was conducted for the BEs with squared error loss function (SELF) and the MLEs of the model parameters and reliability, comparing the bias and mean squares errors (MSE). In addition, the three interval estimates were compared in terms of the average interval length (AIL) and coverage probability (CP).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9140556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91405562022-05-28 Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis Ma, Haijing Yan, Zaizai Jia, Junmei Entropy (Basel) Article The statistical inference of the reliability and parameters of the stress–strength model has received great attention in the field of reliability analysis. When following the generalized progressive hybrid censoring (GPHC) scheme, it is important to discuss the point estimate and interval estimate of the reliability of the multicomponent stress–strength (MSS) model, in which the stress and the strength variables are derived from different distributions by assuming that stress follows the Chen distribution and that strength follows the Gompertz distribution. In the present study, the Newton–Raphson method was adopted to derive the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the model parameters, and the corresponding asymptotic distribution was adopted to construct the asymptotic confidence interval (ACI). Subsequently, the exact confidence interval (ECI) of the parameters was calculated. A hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was adopted to determine the approximate Bayesian estimation (BE) of the unknown parameters and the high posterior density credible interval (HPDCI). A simulation study with the actual dataset was conducted for the BEs with squared error loss function (SELF) and the MLEs of the model parameters and reliability, comparing the bias and mean squares errors (MSE). In addition, the three interval estimates were compared in terms of the average interval length (AIL) and coverage probability (CP). MDPI 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9140556/ /pubmed/35626504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ma, Haijing
Yan, Zaizai
Jia, Junmei
Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title_full Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title_fullStr Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title_short Multicomponent Stress–Strength Model Based on Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring Scheme: A Statistical Analysis
title_sort multicomponent stress–strength model based on generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme: a statistical analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24050619
work_keys_str_mv AT mahaijing multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis
AT yanzaizai multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis
AT jiajunmei multicomponentstressstrengthmodelbasedongeneralizedprogressivehybridcensoringschemeastatisticalanalysis