Cargando…

Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledda, Mario, Merco, Miriam, Sciortino, Antonio, Scatena, Elisa, Convertino, Annalisa, Lisi, Antonella, Del Gaudio, Costantino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383
_version_ 1784715190249455616
author Ledda, Mario
Merco, Miriam
Sciortino, Antonio
Scatena, Elisa
Convertino, Annalisa
Lisi, Antonella
Del Gaudio, Costantino
author_facet Ledda, Mario
Merco, Miriam
Sciortino, Antonio
Scatena, Elisa
Convertino, Annalisa
Lisi, Antonella
Del Gaudio, Costantino
author_sort Ledda, Mario
collection PubMed
description The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding biological tissue. Indeed, mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tissue to be healed represents a further optimization that can limit a possible morphological mismatch between the scaffold and the tissue itself. For this aim, and referring to bone tissue engineering, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds were 3D printed with a microstructure inspired by the trabecular architecture and biologically evaluated by means of human osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells. The cells were seeded on two types of scaffolds differing for the designed pore size (i.e., 400 and 600 µm), showing the same growth exponential trend found in the control and no significant alterations in the actin distribution. The microporous structure of the two tested samples enhanced the protein adsorption capability and mRNA expression of markers related to protein synthesis, proliferation, and osteoblast differentiation. Our findings demonstrate that 3D-printed scaffolds support the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells and the microporous architecture, mimicking the natural bone hierarchical structure, and favoring greater bioactivity. These bioinspired scaffolds represent an interesting new tool for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9140815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91408152022-05-28 Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Ledda, Mario Merco, Miriam Sciortino, Antonio Scatena, Elisa Convertino, Annalisa Lisi, Antonella Del Gaudio, Costantino Int J Mol Sci Article The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding biological tissue. Indeed, mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tissue to be healed represents a further optimization that can limit a possible morphological mismatch between the scaffold and the tissue itself. For this aim, and referring to bone tissue engineering, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds were 3D printed with a microstructure inspired by the trabecular architecture and biologically evaluated by means of human osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells. The cells were seeded on two types of scaffolds differing for the designed pore size (i.e., 400 and 600 µm), showing the same growth exponential trend found in the control and no significant alterations in the actin distribution. The microporous structure of the two tested samples enhanced the protein adsorption capability and mRNA expression of markers related to protein synthesis, proliferation, and osteoblast differentiation. Our findings demonstrate that 3D-printed scaffolds support the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells and the microporous architecture, mimicking the natural bone hierarchical structure, and favoring greater bioactivity. These bioinspired scaffolds represent an interesting new tool for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. MDPI 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9140815/ /pubmed/35628195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ledda, Mario
Merco, Miriam
Sciortino, Antonio
Scatena, Elisa
Convertino, Annalisa
Lisi, Antonella
Del Gaudio, Costantino
Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_full Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_short Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
title_sort biological response to bioinspired microporous 3d-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383
work_keys_str_mv AT leddamario biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT mercomiriam biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT sciortinoantonio biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT scatenaelisa biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT convertinoannalisa biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT lisiantonella biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering
AT delgaudiocostantino biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering