Cargando…
Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383 |
_version_ | 1784715190249455616 |
---|---|
author | Ledda, Mario Merco, Miriam Sciortino, Antonio Scatena, Elisa Convertino, Annalisa Lisi, Antonella Del Gaudio, Costantino |
author_facet | Ledda, Mario Merco, Miriam Sciortino, Antonio Scatena, Elisa Convertino, Annalisa Lisi, Antonella Del Gaudio, Costantino |
author_sort | Ledda, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding biological tissue. Indeed, mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tissue to be healed represents a further optimization that can limit a possible morphological mismatch between the scaffold and the tissue itself. For this aim, and referring to bone tissue engineering, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds were 3D printed with a microstructure inspired by the trabecular architecture and biologically evaluated by means of human osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells. The cells were seeded on two types of scaffolds differing for the designed pore size (i.e., 400 and 600 µm), showing the same growth exponential trend found in the control and no significant alterations in the actin distribution. The microporous structure of the two tested samples enhanced the protein adsorption capability and mRNA expression of markers related to protein synthesis, proliferation, and osteoblast differentiation. Our findings demonstrate that 3D-printed scaffolds support the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells and the microporous architecture, mimicking the natural bone hierarchical structure, and favoring greater bioactivity. These bioinspired scaffolds represent an interesting new tool for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9140815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91408152022-05-28 Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Ledda, Mario Merco, Miriam Sciortino, Antonio Scatena, Elisa Convertino, Annalisa Lisi, Antonella Del Gaudio, Costantino Int J Mol Sci Article The scaffold is a key element in the field of tissue engineering, especially when large defects or substitutions of pathological tissues or organs need to be clinically addressed. The expected outcome is strongly dependent on the cell–scaffold interaction and the integration with the surrounding biological tissue. Indeed, mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tissue to be healed represents a further optimization that can limit a possible morphological mismatch between the scaffold and the tissue itself. For this aim, and referring to bone tissue engineering, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds were 3D printed with a microstructure inspired by the trabecular architecture and biologically evaluated by means of human osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells. The cells were seeded on two types of scaffolds differing for the designed pore size (i.e., 400 and 600 µm), showing the same growth exponential trend found in the control and no significant alterations in the actin distribution. The microporous structure of the two tested samples enhanced the protein adsorption capability and mRNA expression of markers related to protein synthesis, proliferation, and osteoblast differentiation. Our findings demonstrate that 3D-printed scaffolds support the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells and the microporous architecture, mimicking the natural bone hierarchical structure, and favoring greater bioactivity. These bioinspired scaffolds represent an interesting new tool for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. MDPI 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9140815/ /pubmed/35628195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ledda, Mario Merco, Miriam Sciortino, Antonio Scatena, Elisa Convertino, Annalisa Lisi, Antonella Del Gaudio, Costantino Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title | Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Biological Response to Bioinspired Microporous 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | biological response to bioinspired microporous 3d-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leddamario biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT mercomiriam biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT sciortinoantonio biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT scatenaelisa biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT convertinoannalisa biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT lisiantonella biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT delgaudiocostantino biologicalresponsetobioinspiredmicroporous3dprintedscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering |