Cargando…

Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?

While the sustainability of grain production has been extensively studied, there have been few studies focusing on the impact of grain policy adjustment on its sustainable production, and the quantitative relationship between these two aspects and the internal mechanism is not completely clear. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jingdong, Lin, Qingning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106310
_version_ 1784715209946955776
author Li, Jingdong
Lin, Qingning
author_facet Li, Jingdong
Lin, Qingning
author_sort Li, Jingdong
collection PubMed
description While the sustainability of grain production has been extensively studied, there have been few studies focusing on the impact of grain policy adjustment on its sustainable production, and the quantitative relationship between these two aspects and the internal mechanism is not completely clear. The main objective of this paper was to explore the impact of grain purchase and storage policy (GPSP) adjustment on its green productivity by expounding the evolution logic and influence mechanism of GPSP. Therefore, taking maize production as an example, this paper constructs the analysis framework of the evolution logic and influence mechanism, and the super-epsilon-based measure model (Super-EBM) is adopted to measure maize green productivity (MGP) in main producing areas from 1997 to 2019, then two groups of difference-in-differences (DID) models are constructed to study the influence of the temporary purchase and storage policy (TPSP) and the producer subsidy policy (PSP) on MGP. The main conclusions include: the implementation of TPSP reduces MGP in Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia (experimental group), whereas the implementation of PSP improves MGP in these provinces is due to the difference in policy effects under the different regulatory objectives and measures; under the demonstration effect of two policies, the increase in effective irrigation and agricultural financial expenditure are important factors to improve MGP, but the backwardness of agricultural mechanization has been hindering the improvement of MGP; after the reform from TPSP to PSP, the continuous increase in production capacity hinders the improvement of MGP under the support effect, the impacts of farmers’ income and agricultural production price on MGP both shift from negative to positive under the wealth effect, and the influence of production agglomeration on MGP shifts from negative to positive under the siphon effect. The excessive implementation of GPSP has seriously affected the sustainability of grain production, thus, this study has certain practical significance and guiding value. The paper emphasizes that the effective way to achieve sustainable food production is to combine the adjustment of GPSP with improving the subsidy mechanism, enhancing the agricultural mechanization and maintaining the appropriate scale of operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9140889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91408892022-05-28 Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity? Li, Jingdong Lin, Qingning Int J Environ Res Public Health Article While the sustainability of grain production has been extensively studied, there have been few studies focusing on the impact of grain policy adjustment on its sustainable production, and the quantitative relationship between these two aspects and the internal mechanism is not completely clear. The main objective of this paper was to explore the impact of grain purchase and storage policy (GPSP) adjustment on its green productivity by expounding the evolution logic and influence mechanism of GPSP. Therefore, taking maize production as an example, this paper constructs the analysis framework of the evolution logic and influence mechanism, and the super-epsilon-based measure model (Super-EBM) is adopted to measure maize green productivity (MGP) in main producing areas from 1997 to 2019, then two groups of difference-in-differences (DID) models are constructed to study the influence of the temporary purchase and storage policy (TPSP) and the producer subsidy policy (PSP) on MGP. The main conclusions include: the implementation of TPSP reduces MGP in Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia (experimental group), whereas the implementation of PSP improves MGP in these provinces is due to the difference in policy effects under the different regulatory objectives and measures; under the demonstration effect of two policies, the increase in effective irrigation and agricultural financial expenditure are important factors to improve MGP, but the backwardness of agricultural mechanization has been hindering the improvement of MGP; after the reform from TPSP to PSP, the continuous increase in production capacity hinders the improvement of MGP under the support effect, the impacts of farmers’ income and agricultural production price on MGP both shift from negative to positive under the wealth effect, and the influence of production agglomeration on MGP shifts from negative to positive under the siphon effect. The excessive implementation of GPSP has seriously affected the sustainability of grain production, thus, this study has certain practical significance and guiding value. The paper emphasizes that the effective way to achieve sustainable food production is to combine the adjustment of GPSP with improving the subsidy mechanism, enhancing the agricultural mechanization and maintaining the appropriate scale of operation. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9140889/ /pubmed/35627849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106310 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Jingdong
Lin, Qingning
Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title_full Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title_fullStr Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title_short Can the Adjustment of China’s Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?
title_sort can the adjustment of china’s grain purchase and storage policy improve its green productivity?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9140889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106310
work_keys_str_mv AT lijingdong cantheadjustmentofchinasgrainpurchaseandstoragepolicyimproveitsgreenproductivity
AT linqingning cantheadjustmentofchinasgrainpurchaseandstoragepolicyimproveitsgreenproductivity