Cargando…
The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of robotic therapy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), measured on the basis of the patients’ self-perception of limited upper limb function and level of independence in activities of daily living. Methods: Twenty-si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106321 |
_version_ | 1784715266030043136 |
---|---|
author | Lozano-Berrio, V. Alcobendas-Maestro, M. Polonio-López, B. Gil-Agudo, A. de la Peña-González, A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, A. |
author_facet | Lozano-Berrio, V. Alcobendas-Maestro, M. Polonio-López, B. Gil-Agudo, A. de la Peña-González, A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, A. |
author_sort | Lozano-Berrio, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of robotic therapy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), measured on the basis of the patients’ self-perception of limited upper limb function and level of independence in activities of daily living. Methods: Twenty-six patients with cervical SCI completed the treatment after being randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The training consisted of 40 experimental sessions 1 h in duration, ideally occurring 5 days/week for 8 weeks. In addition to the conventional daily therapy (30 min), the control group received another 30 min of conventional therapy, whereas the intervention group received 30 min of robotic therapy. Patients were evaluated by means of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) clinical scales. Results: The improvement in the feeding item of SCIM was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group after the treatment (2.00 (0.91) vs. 1.18 (0.89), p = 0.03). The correlation between the CUE and SCIM scales was higher at the ending than at baseline for both groups. Conclusions: Although both groups improved, the clinical relevance related to the changes observed for both assessments was slightly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9141118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91411182022-05-28 The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Lozano-Berrio, V. Alcobendas-Maestro, M. Polonio-López, B. Gil-Agudo, A. de la Peña-González, A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of robotic therapy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), measured on the basis of the patients’ self-perception of limited upper limb function and level of independence in activities of daily living. Methods: Twenty-six patients with cervical SCI completed the treatment after being randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The training consisted of 40 experimental sessions 1 h in duration, ideally occurring 5 days/week for 8 weeks. In addition to the conventional daily therapy (30 min), the control group received another 30 min of conventional therapy, whereas the intervention group received 30 min of robotic therapy. Patients were evaluated by means of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) clinical scales. Results: The improvement in the feeding item of SCIM was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group after the treatment (2.00 (0.91) vs. 1.18 (0.89), p = 0.03). The correlation between the CUE and SCIM scales was higher at the ending than at baseline for both groups. Conclusions: Although both groups improved, the clinical relevance related to the changes observed for both assessments was slightly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9141118/ /pubmed/35627855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106321 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lozano-Berrio, V. Alcobendas-Maestro, M. Polonio-López, B. Gil-Agudo, A. de la Peña-González, A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, A. The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | impact of robotic therapy on the self-perception of upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lozanoberriov theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alcobendasmaestrom theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poloniolopezb theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gilagudoa theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delapenagonzaleza theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delosreyesguzmana theimpactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lozanoberriov impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alcobendasmaestrom impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poloniolopezb impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gilagudoa impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delapenagonzaleza impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delosreyesguzmana impactofrobotictherapyontheselfperceptionofupperlimbfunctionincervicalspinalcordinjuryapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |