Cargando…

Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) could achieve the removal of antibiotics and generate power in the meantime, a process in which the bacterial community structure played a key role. Previous work has mainly focused on microbes in the anode, while their role in the cathode was seldomly mentioned. Thus, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhenzhen, Li, Hongna, Li, Na, Sardar, Muhammad Fahad, Song, Tingting, Zhu, Hong, Xing, Xuan, Zhu, Changxiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106253
_version_ 1784715271867465728
author Yang, Zhenzhen
Li, Hongna
Li, Na
Sardar, Muhammad Fahad
Song, Tingting
Zhu, Hong
Xing, Xuan
Zhu, Changxiong
author_facet Yang, Zhenzhen
Li, Hongna
Li, Na
Sardar, Muhammad Fahad
Song, Tingting
Zhu, Hong
Xing, Xuan
Zhu, Changxiong
author_sort Yang, Zhenzhen
collection PubMed
description Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) could achieve the removal of antibiotics and generate power in the meantime, a process in which the bacterial community structure played a key role. Previous work has mainly focused on microbes in the anode, while their role in the cathode was seldomly mentioned. Thus, this study explored the bacterial community of both electrodes in MFCs under sulfadiazine (SDZ) pressure. The results showed that the addition of SDZ had a limited effect on the electrochemical performance, and the maximum output voltage was kept at 0.55 V. As the most abundant phylum, Proteobacteria played an important role in both the anode and cathode. Among them, Geobacter (40.30%) worked for power generation, while Xanthobacter (11.11%), Bradyrhizobium (9.04%), and Achromobacter (7.30%) functioned in SDZ removal. Actinobacteria mainly clustered in the cathode, in which Microbacterium (9.85%) was responsible for SDZ removal. Bacteroidetes, associated with the degradation of SDZ, showed no significant difference between the anode and cathode. Cathodic and part of anodic bacteria could remove SDZ efficiently in MFCs through synergistic interactions and produce metabolites for exoelectrogenic bacteria. The potential hosts of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) presented mainly at the anode, while cathodic bacteria might be responsible for ARGs reduction. This work elucidated the role of microorganisms and their synergistic interaction in MFCs and provided a reference to generate power and remove antibiotics using MFCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91411422022-05-28 Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure Yang, Zhenzhen Li, Hongna Li, Na Sardar, Muhammad Fahad Song, Tingting Zhu, Hong Xing, Xuan Zhu, Changxiong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) could achieve the removal of antibiotics and generate power in the meantime, a process in which the bacterial community structure played a key role. Previous work has mainly focused on microbes in the anode, while their role in the cathode was seldomly mentioned. Thus, this study explored the bacterial community of both electrodes in MFCs under sulfadiazine (SDZ) pressure. The results showed that the addition of SDZ had a limited effect on the electrochemical performance, and the maximum output voltage was kept at 0.55 V. As the most abundant phylum, Proteobacteria played an important role in both the anode and cathode. Among them, Geobacter (40.30%) worked for power generation, while Xanthobacter (11.11%), Bradyrhizobium (9.04%), and Achromobacter (7.30%) functioned in SDZ removal. Actinobacteria mainly clustered in the cathode, in which Microbacterium (9.85%) was responsible for SDZ removal. Bacteroidetes, associated with the degradation of SDZ, showed no significant difference between the anode and cathode. Cathodic and part of anodic bacteria could remove SDZ efficiently in MFCs through synergistic interactions and produce metabolites for exoelectrogenic bacteria. The potential hosts of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) presented mainly at the anode, while cathodic bacteria might be responsible for ARGs reduction. This work elucidated the role of microorganisms and their synergistic interaction in MFCs and provided a reference to generate power and remove antibiotics using MFCs. MDPI 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9141142/ /pubmed/35627790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106253 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Zhenzhen
Li, Hongna
Li, Na
Sardar, Muhammad Fahad
Song, Tingting
Zhu, Hong
Xing, Xuan
Zhu, Changxiong
Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title_full Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title_fullStr Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title_short Dynamics of a Bacterial Community in the Anode and Cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells under Sulfadiazine Pressure
title_sort dynamics of a bacterial community in the anode and cathode of microbial fuel cells under sulfadiazine pressure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106253
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhenzhen dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT lihongna dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT lina dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT sardarmuhammadfahad dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT songtingting dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT zhuhong dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT xingxuan dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure
AT zhuchangxiong dynamicsofabacterialcommunityintheanodeandcathodeofmicrobialfuelcellsundersulfadiazinepressure