Cargando…

Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose

Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chacón, Irene, Roales, Javier, Lopes-Costa, Tânia, Pedrosa, José M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477
_version_ 1784715291510439936
author Chacón, Irene
Roales, Javier
Lopes-Costa, Tânia
Pedrosa, José M.
author_facet Chacón, Irene
Roales, Javier
Lopes-Costa, Tânia
Pedrosa, José M.
author_sort Chacón, Irene
collection PubMed
description Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electronic olfactory system (EOS) and examines its abilities using the panel test as a reference. To do this, six commercial olive oils labelled as extra virgin were analyzed with an EOS and classified by three panels recognized by the International Olive Council. The organoleptic analysis of the oils by the panels indicated that most of the oils in the study were in fact not extra virgin. Besides this, the classifications showed inconsistencies between panels, needing statistical treatment to be used as a reference for the EOS training. The analysis of the same oils by the EOS and their subsequent statistical analysis by PCA revealed a good correlation between the first principal component and the olive oil quality from the panels using average scores. It also showed a more consistent classification than the panels. Overall, the EOS proved to be a cheaper, faster, and highly reliable method as a complement to the panel test for the olive oil classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91412202022-05-28 Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose Chacón, Irene Roales, Javier Lopes-Costa, Tânia Pedrosa, José M. Foods Article Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electronic olfactory system (EOS) and examines its abilities using the panel test as a reference. To do this, six commercial olive oils labelled as extra virgin were analyzed with an EOS and classified by three panels recognized by the International Olive Council. The organoleptic analysis of the oils by the panels indicated that most of the oils in the study were in fact not extra virgin. Besides this, the classifications showed inconsistencies between panels, needing statistical treatment to be used as a reference for the EOS training. The analysis of the same oils by the EOS and their subsequent statistical analysis by PCA revealed a good correlation between the first principal component and the olive oil quality from the panels using average scores. It also showed a more consistent classification than the panels. Overall, the EOS proved to be a cheaper, faster, and highly reliable method as a complement to the panel test for the olive oil classification. MDPI 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9141220/ /pubmed/35627047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chacón, Irene
Roales, Javier
Lopes-Costa, Tânia
Pedrosa, José M.
Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title_full Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title_fullStr Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title_short Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
title_sort analyzing the organoleptic quality of commercial extra virgin olive oils: ioc recognized panel tests vs. electronic nose
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477
work_keys_str_mv AT chaconirene analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose
AT roalesjavier analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose
AT lopescostatania analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose
AT pedrosajosem analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose