Cargando…
Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose
Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477 |
_version_ | 1784715291510439936 |
---|---|
author | Chacón, Irene Roales, Javier Lopes-Costa, Tânia Pedrosa, José M. |
author_facet | Chacón, Irene Roales, Javier Lopes-Costa, Tânia Pedrosa, José M. |
author_sort | Chacón, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electronic olfactory system (EOS) and examines its abilities using the panel test as a reference. To do this, six commercial olive oils labelled as extra virgin were analyzed with an EOS and classified by three panels recognized by the International Olive Council. The organoleptic analysis of the oils by the panels indicated that most of the oils in the study were in fact not extra virgin. Besides this, the classifications showed inconsistencies between panels, needing statistical treatment to be used as a reference for the EOS training. The analysis of the same oils by the EOS and their subsequent statistical analysis by PCA revealed a good correlation between the first principal component and the olive oil quality from the panels using average scores. It also showed a more consistent classification than the panels. Overall, the EOS proved to be a cheaper, faster, and highly reliable method as a complement to the panel test for the olive oil classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9141220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91412202022-05-28 Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose Chacón, Irene Roales, Javier Lopes-Costa, Tânia Pedrosa, José M. Foods Article Virgin olive oil (VOO) classification into quality categories determines its labeling and market price. This procedure involves performing a series of chemical–physical analyses and, ultimately, a sensory analysis through the panel test. This work explores the analysis of VOOs quality with an electronic olfactory system (EOS) and examines its abilities using the panel test as a reference. To do this, six commercial olive oils labelled as extra virgin were analyzed with an EOS and classified by three panels recognized by the International Olive Council. The organoleptic analysis of the oils by the panels indicated that most of the oils in the study were in fact not extra virgin. Besides this, the classifications showed inconsistencies between panels, needing statistical treatment to be used as a reference for the EOS training. The analysis of the same oils by the EOS and their subsequent statistical analysis by PCA revealed a good correlation between the first principal component and the olive oil quality from the panels using average scores. It also showed a more consistent classification than the panels. Overall, the EOS proved to be a cheaper, faster, and highly reliable method as a complement to the panel test for the olive oil classification. MDPI 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9141220/ /pubmed/35627047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chacón, Irene Roales, Javier Lopes-Costa, Tânia Pedrosa, José M. Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title | Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title_full | Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title_fullStr | Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title_short | Analyzing the Organoleptic Quality of Commercial Extra Virgin Olive Oils: IOC Recognized Panel Tests vs. Electronic Nose |
title_sort | analyzing the organoleptic quality of commercial extra virgin olive oils: ioc recognized panel tests vs. electronic nose |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11101477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaconirene analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose AT roalesjavier analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose AT lopescostatania analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose AT pedrosajosem analyzingtheorganolepticqualityofcommercialextravirginoliveoilsiocrecognizedpaneltestsvselectronicnose |