Cargando…

Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents

Children between the ages of 4–6 years represent the population most affected by drowning accidents, while their early involvement in physical activity, and more specifically in aquatic activities is a key factor in their future physical life journey. The systematic review’s purpose was to identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mekkaoui, Léa, Schnitzler, Christophe, Sidney, Michel, Gandrieau, Joseph, Camporelli, Fabien, Potdevin, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106180
_version_ 1784715334148685824
author Mekkaoui, Léa
Schnitzler, Christophe
Sidney, Michel
Gandrieau, Joseph
Camporelli, Fabien
Potdevin, François
author_facet Mekkaoui, Léa
Schnitzler, Christophe
Sidney, Michel
Gandrieau, Joseph
Camporelli, Fabien
Potdevin, François
author_sort Mekkaoui, Léa
collection PubMed
description Children between the ages of 4–6 years represent the population most affected by drowning accidents, while their early involvement in physical activity, and more specifically in aquatic activities is a key factor in their future physical life journey. The systematic review’s purpose was to identify aspects in the intervention’s studies with children and/or their parents that had a significant impact on the Aquatic Literacy (AL) dimensions mentioned as motor, psychological, affective, and cognitive. The PICO method was used to define the research question and PRISMA checklist searched for articles in nine databases: Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, ProQuest, PsychInfo, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were: (1) English language, (2) primary research, (3) population of 4–6 year old children or their parents, (4) intervention study design, and (5) results related to at least one of the AL domains. The strength of evidence and the risk of bias were assessed. Results showed relatively poor number of studies for such a vulnerable population regarding the drowning risk (n = 8 for parents and n = 14 for children intervention). Studies did not show a consensus on which educational approach was more beneficial than others. Concerning parental education, results were rather homogeneous, especially concerning the theoretical frameworks employed and the relevancy to include parents in swimming programs. The development of pedagogical tools for promotion and evaluation, based on the AL theoretical framework, could help to clarify the question of “how to teach” children to prevent drowning and engage young children in long-term physical activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91413892022-05-28 Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents Mekkaoui, Léa Schnitzler, Christophe Sidney, Michel Gandrieau, Joseph Camporelli, Fabien Potdevin, François Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Children between the ages of 4–6 years represent the population most affected by drowning accidents, while their early involvement in physical activity, and more specifically in aquatic activities is a key factor in their future physical life journey. The systematic review’s purpose was to identify aspects in the intervention’s studies with children and/or their parents that had a significant impact on the Aquatic Literacy (AL) dimensions mentioned as motor, psychological, affective, and cognitive. The PICO method was used to define the research question and PRISMA checklist searched for articles in nine databases: Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, ProQuest, PsychInfo, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were: (1) English language, (2) primary research, (3) population of 4–6 year old children or their parents, (4) intervention study design, and (5) results related to at least one of the AL domains. The strength of evidence and the risk of bias were assessed. Results showed relatively poor number of studies for such a vulnerable population regarding the drowning risk (n = 8 for parents and n = 14 for children intervention). Studies did not show a consensus on which educational approach was more beneficial than others. Concerning parental education, results were rather homogeneous, especially concerning the theoretical frameworks employed and the relevancy to include parents in swimming programs. The development of pedagogical tools for promotion and evaluation, based on the AL theoretical framework, could help to clarify the question of “how to teach” children to prevent drowning and engage young children in long-term physical activities. MDPI 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9141389/ /pubmed/35627720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106180 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Mekkaoui, Léa
Schnitzler, Christophe
Sidney, Michel
Gandrieau, Joseph
Camporelli, Fabien
Potdevin, François
Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title_full Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title_fullStr Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title_full_unstemmed Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title_short Building the Foundation of Aquatic Literacy in 4–6 Years-Old Children: A Systematic Review of Good Pedagogical Practices for Children and Parents
title_sort building the foundation of aquatic literacy in 4–6 years-old children: a systematic review of good pedagogical practices for children and parents
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106180
work_keys_str_mv AT mekkaouilea buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents
AT schnitzlerchristophe buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents
AT sidneymichel buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents
AT gandrieaujoseph buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents
AT camporellifabien buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents
AT potdevinfrancois buildingthefoundationofaquaticliteracyin46yearsoldchildrenasystematicreviewofgoodpedagogicalpracticesforchildrenandparents