Cargando…
From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care
Compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires substitute decision making being abolished and replaced with supported decision making. The current exploratory study involved a series of hui (meetings) with subject matter experts across the spectrum of the m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106002 |
_version_ | 1784715352830115840 |
---|---|
author | Gordon, Sarah Gardiner, Tracey Gledhill, Kris Tamatea, Armon Newton-Howes, Giles |
author_facet | Gordon, Sarah Gardiner, Tracey Gledhill, Kris Tamatea, Armon Newton-Howes, Giles |
author_sort | Gordon, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires substitute decision making being abolished and replaced with supported decision making. The current exploratory study involved a series of hui (meetings) with subject matter experts across the spectrum of the mental health care system to identify interventions facilitative of supported decision making; and the prioritisation of those in accordance with their own perspectives. A mixed-methods approach was used to categorise, describe and rank the data. Categories of intervention identified included proactive pre-event planning/post-event debriefing, enabling options and choices, information provision, facilitating conditions and support to make a decision, and education. The category of facilitating conditions and support to make a decision was prioritised by the majority of stakeholders; however, people from Māori, Pasifika, and LGBTQIA+ perspectives, who disproportionally experience inequities and discrimination, prioritised the categories of proactive post-event debriefing/pre-event planning and/or information provision. Similar attributes across categories of intervention detailed the importance of easily and variably accessible options and choices and how these could best be supported in terms of people, place, time, material resources, regular reviews and reflection. Implications of these findings, particularly in terms of the operationalisation of supported decision making in practice, are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9141465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91414652022-05-28 From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care Gordon, Sarah Gardiner, Tracey Gledhill, Kris Tamatea, Armon Newton-Howes, Giles Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires substitute decision making being abolished and replaced with supported decision making. The current exploratory study involved a series of hui (meetings) with subject matter experts across the spectrum of the mental health care system to identify interventions facilitative of supported decision making; and the prioritisation of those in accordance with their own perspectives. A mixed-methods approach was used to categorise, describe and rank the data. Categories of intervention identified included proactive pre-event planning/post-event debriefing, enabling options and choices, information provision, facilitating conditions and support to make a decision, and education. The category of facilitating conditions and support to make a decision was prioritised by the majority of stakeholders; however, people from Māori, Pasifika, and LGBTQIA+ perspectives, who disproportionally experience inequities and discrimination, prioritised the categories of proactive post-event debriefing/pre-event planning and/or information provision. Similar attributes across categories of intervention detailed the importance of easily and variably accessible options and choices and how these could best be supported in terms of people, place, time, material resources, regular reviews and reflection. Implications of these findings, particularly in terms of the operationalisation of supported decision making in practice, are discussed. MDPI 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9141465/ /pubmed/35627542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106002 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gordon, Sarah Gardiner, Tracey Gledhill, Kris Tamatea, Armon Newton-Howes, Giles From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title | From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title_full | From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title_fullStr | From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title_full_unstemmed | From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title_short | From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care |
title_sort | from substitute to supported decision making: practitioner, community and service-user perspectives on privileging will and preferences in mental health care |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonsarah fromsubstitutetosupporteddecisionmakingpractitionercommunityandserviceuserperspectivesonprivilegingwillandpreferencesinmentalhealthcare AT gardinertracey fromsubstitutetosupporteddecisionmakingpractitionercommunityandserviceuserperspectivesonprivilegingwillandpreferencesinmentalhealthcare AT gledhillkris fromsubstitutetosupporteddecisionmakingpractitionercommunityandserviceuserperspectivesonprivilegingwillandpreferencesinmentalhealthcare AT tamateaarmon fromsubstitutetosupporteddecisionmakingpractitionercommunityandserviceuserperspectivesonprivilegingwillandpreferencesinmentalhealthcare AT newtonhowesgiles fromsubstitutetosupporteddecisionmakingpractitionercommunityandserviceuserperspectivesonprivilegingwillandpreferencesinmentalhealthcare |