Cargando…

Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review

Occupational physicians (OPs) offer a wide range of health support for employees and are confronted with varying job characteristics and demands. They monitor occupational health and safety and promote work(place)-related health measures and assessments. While helping employees to (re)gain a healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eisch, Eva, Kuper, Paulina, Lindert, Lara, Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106222
_version_ 1784715380243038208
author Eisch, Eva
Kuper, Paulina
Lindert, Lara
Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
author_facet Eisch, Eva
Kuper, Paulina
Lindert, Lara
Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
author_sort Eisch, Eva
collection PubMed
description Occupational physicians (OPs) offer a wide range of health support for employees and are confronted with varying job characteristics and demands. They monitor occupational health and safety and promote work(place)-related health measures and assessments. While helping employees to (re)gain a healthy status, their own job satisfaction as well as the investigation of their working conditions have earned limited research attention. Thus, this scoping review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge concerning OPs’ working conditions, i.e., work-related resources and stressors. PubMed, Web of Science and LIVIVO as well as grey literature were screened for relevant English or German articles until 10/2021. From a total of 1683 identified publications, we analyzed 24 full text articles that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The overall study sample included 3486 male (54.6%), 2892 female (45.3%) and 5 diverse OPs, from which 1049 OPs worked in full-time (85.6%) and 177 in part-time (14.4%). The majority (72.4%) worked for the Occupational Health Service (OHS), 13% were self-employed, and 14.6% worked for a company/in-house service. The classification of stressors and resources was based on an inductively generated categorization scheme. We categorized 8 personal, relational and environmental resources and 10 stress factors. The main resources were support for personnel development and promotion, positive organizational policy, promoting work-life balance and other aspects of health. Key stressors were information deficits, organizational deficiency and uncertainty as well as socioeconomic influences and high professional obligations. The working conditions of OPs are still a topic with too little research attention. This scoping review reveals several starting points to maintain a healthy OP workforce and gives recommendations for action for the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91415822022-05-28 Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review Eisch, Eva Kuper, Paulina Lindert, Lara Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna) Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Occupational physicians (OPs) offer a wide range of health support for employees and are confronted with varying job characteristics and demands. They monitor occupational health and safety and promote work(place)-related health measures and assessments. While helping employees to (re)gain a healthy status, their own job satisfaction as well as the investigation of their working conditions have earned limited research attention. Thus, this scoping review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge concerning OPs’ working conditions, i.e., work-related resources and stressors. PubMed, Web of Science and LIVIVO as well as grey literature were screened for relevant English or German articles until 10/2021. From a total of 1683 identified publications, we analyzed 24 full text articles that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The overall study sample included 3486 male (54.6%), 2892 female (45.3%) and 5 diverse OPs, from which 1049 OPs worked in full-time (85.6%) and 177 in part-time (14.4%). The majority (72.4%) worked for the Occupational Health Service (OHS), 13% were self-employed, and 14.6% worked for a company/in-house service. The classification of stressors and resources was based on an inductively generated categorization scheme. We categorized 8 personal, relational and environmental resources and 10 stress factors. The main resources were support for personnel development and promotion, positive organizational policy, promoting work-life balance and other aspects of health. Key stressors were information deficits, organizational deficiency and uncertainty as well as socioeconomic influences and high professional obligations. The working conditions of OPs are still a topic with too little research attention. This scoping review reveals several starting points to maintain a healthy OP workforce and gives recommendations for action for the near future. MDPI 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9141582/ /pubmed/35627762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106222 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Eisch, Eva
Kuper, Paulina
Lindert, Lara
Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title_full Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title_short Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians—A Scoping Review
title_sort working conditions of occupational physicians—a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106222
work_keys_str_mv AT eischeva workingconditionsofoccupationalphysiciansascopingreview
AT kuperpaulina workingconditionsofoccupationalphysiciansascopingreview
AT lindertlara workingconditionsofoccupationalphysiciansascopingreview
AT choikyungeunanna workingconditionsofoccupationalphysiciansascopingreview