Cargando…

Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study

This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients with low back and leg p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokosuka, Kimiaki, Sato, Kimiaki, Yamada, Kei, Yoshida, Tatsuhiro, Shimazaki, Takahiro, Morito, Shinji, Nishida, Kouta, Matsuo, Atsushi, Fudo, Takuma, Shiba, Naoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051267
_version_ 1784715476658552832
author Yokosuka, Kimiaki
Sato, Kimiaki
Yamada, Kei
Yoshida, Tatsuhiro
Shimazaki, Takahiro
Morito, Shinji
Nishida, Kouta
Matsuo, Atsushi
Fudo, Takuma
Shiba, Naoto
author_facet Yokosuka, Kimiaki
Sato, Kimiaki
Yamada, Kei
Yoshida, Tatsuhiro
Shimazaki, Takahiro
Morito, Shinji
Nishida, Kouta
Matsuo, Atsushi
Fudo, Takuma
Shiba, Naoto
author_sort Yokosuka, Kimiaki
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients with low back and leg pain who underwent percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (epidural neuroplasty or percutaneous adhesiolysis) were examined. The axial views of CT epidurography were classified into six types to examine each intervertebral disc: round type, ellipse type, spike type, Benz mark, incomplete block, complete block, and non-contrast. MRI images were graded from A to D using the Schizas classification. Notably, 176 images were round-type and ellipse-type axial views, and 138 were spike-type and Benz-mark views; Schizas classification Grades A and B were observed in 272 and 47 MRI images, respectively. The incomplete block and complete block axial images did not significantly differ in CT epidurography and Schizas classification Grades C and D. The images showing Benz marks existed only at the L4/5 and L5/S intervertebral levels and only in 14.7% of patients. The ratio of normal shadows differed between MRI images and CT epidurography. Therefore, CT epidurography may enable a detailed evaluation of the epidural space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91419852022-05-28 Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study Yokosuka, Kimiaki Sato, Kimiaki Yamada, Kei Yoshida, Tatsuhiro Shimazaki, Takahiro Morito, Shinji Nishida, Kouta Matsuo, Atsushi Fudo, Takuma Shiba, Naoto Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients with low back and leg pain who underwent percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (epidural neuroplasty or percutaneous adhesiolysis) were examined. The axial views of CT epidurography were classified into six types to examine each intervertebral disc: round type, ellipse type, spike type, Benz mark, incomplete block, complete block, and non-contrast. MRI images were graded from A to D using the Schizas classification. Notably, 176 images were round-type and ellipse-type axial views, and 138 were spike-type and Benz-mark views; Schizas classification Grades A and B were observed in 272 and 47 MRI images, respectively. The incomplete block and complete block axial images did not significantly differ in CT epidurography and Schizas classification Grades C and D. The images showing Benz marks existed only at the L4/5 and L5/S intervertebral levels and only in 14.7% of patients. The ratio of normal shadows differed between MRI images and CT epidurography. Therefore, CT epidurography may enable a detailed evaluation of the epidural space. MDPI 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9141985/ /pubmed/35626422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051267 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yokosuka, Kimiaki
Sato, Kimiaki
Yamada, Kei
Yoshida, Tatsuhiro
Shimazaki, Takahiro
Morito, Shinji
Nishida, Kouta
Matsuo, Atsushi
Fudo, Takuma
Shiba, Naoto
Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title_full Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title_fullStr Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title_short Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
title_sort computed tomographic epidurography in patients with low back pain and leg pain: a single-center observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35626422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051267
work_keys_str_mv AT yokosukakimiaki computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT satokimiaki computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT yamadakei computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT yoshidatatsuhiro computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT shimazakitakahiro computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT moritoshinji computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT nishidakouta computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT matsuoatsushi computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT fudotakuma computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy
AT shibanaoto computedtomographicepidurographyinpatientswithlowbackpainandlegpainasinglecenterobservationalstudy