Cargando…

Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction

Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Qing, Teng, Jinyan, Cai, Xiaodian, Li, Jiaqi, Zhang, Zhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722
_version_ 1784715476894482432
author Lin, Qing
Teng, Jinyan
Cai, Xiaodian
Li, Jiaqi
Zhang, Zhe
author_facet Lin, Qing
Teng, Jinyan
Cai, Xiaodian
Li, Jiaqi
Zhang, Zhe
author_sort Lin, Qing
collection PubMed
description Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9141986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91419862022-05-28 Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction Lin, Qing Teng, Jinyan Cai, Xiaodian Li, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhe Genes (Basel) Article Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. MDPI 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9141986/ /pubmed/35627107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Qing
Teng, Jinyan
Cai, Xiaodian
Li, Jiaqi
Zhang, Zhe
Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title_full Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title_fullStr Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title_full_unstemmed Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title_short Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
title_sort utilization strategies of two environment phenotypes in genomic prediction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722
work_keys_str_mv AT linqing utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction
AT tengjinyan utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction
AT caixiaodian utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction
AT lijiaqi utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction
AT zhangzhe utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction