Cargando…
Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction
Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different av...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722 |
_version_ | 1784715476894482432 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Qing Teng, Jinyan Cai, Xiaodian Li, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhe |
author_facet | Lin, Qing Teng, Jinyan Cai, Xiaodian Li, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhe |
author_sort | Lin, Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9141986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91419862022-05-28 Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction Lin, Qing Teng, Jinyan Cai, Xiaodian Li, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhe Genes (Basel) Article Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. MDPI 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9141986/ /pubmed/35627107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Qing Teng, Jinyan Cai, Xiaodian Li, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhe Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title | Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title_full | Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title_fullStr | Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title_short | Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction |
title_sort | utilization strategies of two environment phenotypes in genomic prediction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35627107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13050722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linqing utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction AT tengjinyan utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction AT caixiaodian utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction AT lijiaqi utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction AT zhangzhe utilizationstrategiesoftwoenvironmentphenotypesingenomicprediction |