Cargando…

The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Prior abdominal liposuction can be viewed as a relative or absolute contraindication to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction given concerns for damaged perforators and scarring complicating intraoperative dissection. This systematic review aims to explore the outcomes of abdominally ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bond, Evalina S., Soteropulos, Carol E., Poore, Samuel O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35832166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748646
_version_ 1784715526062211072
author Bond, Evalina S.
Soteropulos, Carol E.
Poore, Samuel O.
author_facet Bond, Evalina S.
Soteropulos, Carol E.
Poore, Samuel O.
author_sort Bond, Evalina S.
collection PubMed
description Prior abdominal liposuction can be viewed as a relative or absolute contraindication to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction given concerns for damaged perforators and scarring complicating intraoperative dissection. This systematic review aims to explore the outcomes of abdominally based breast reconstruction in patients with a history of abdominal liposuction. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from the earliest available date through June 2020. Deep inferior epigastric perforator, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), superficial inferior epigastric artery, and pedicled TRAM flaps were included for evaluation. Complications included total or partial flap loss, fat necrosis, seroma, delayed wound healing, and donor site complications. After inclusion criteria were applied, 336 nonduplicate articles were screened, yielding 11 for final review, representing 55 flaps in 43 patients. There was no instance of total flap loss, eight (14.5%) flaps developed partial loss or fat necrosis, three (5.4%) flaps had delayed wound healing, and two (4.6%) patients had donor site complications. Most authors (8/11) utilized some type of preoperative imaging. Doppler ultrasonography was the most used modality, and these patients had the lowest rate of partial flap loss or flap fat necrosis (8%), followed by those without any preoperative imaging (10%). In conclusion, this review supports that patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction with a history of abdominal liposuction are not at an increased risk of flap or donor site complications. Although preoperative imaging was common, it did not reliably decrease complications. Further prospective studies are needed to address the role of imaging in improving outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9142226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91422262022-05-28 The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Bond, Evalina S. Soteropulos, Carol E. Poore, Samuel O. Arch Plast Surg Prior abdominal liposuction can be viewed as a relative or absolute contraindication to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction given concerns for damaged perforators and scarring complicating intraoperative dissection. This systematic review aims to explore the outcomes of abdominally based breast reconstruction in patients with a history of abdominal liposuction. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from the earliest available date through June 2020. Deep inferior epigastric perforator, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), superficial inferior epigastric artery, and pedicled TRAM flaps were included for evaluation. Complications included total or partial flap loss, fat necrosis, seroma, delayed wound healing, and donor site complications. After inclusion criteria were applied, 336 nonduplicate articles were screened, yielding 11 for final review, representing 55 flaps in 43 patients. There was no instance of total flap loss, eight (14.5%) flaps developed partial loss or fat necrosis, three (5.4%) flaps had delayed wound healing, and two (4.6%) patients had donor site complications. Most authors (8/11) utilized some type of preoperative imaging. Doppler ultrasonography was the most used modality, and these patients had the lowest rate of partial flap loss or flap fat necrosis (8%), followed by those without any preoperative imaging (10%). In conclusion, this review supports that patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction with a history of abdominal liposuction are not at an increased risk of flap or donor site complications. Although preoperative imaging was common, it did not reliably decrease complications. Further prospective studies are needed to address the role of imaging in improving outcomes. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9142226/ /pubmed/35832166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748646 Text en The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bond, Evalina S.
Soteropulos, Carol E.
Poore, Samuel O.
The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_full The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_short The Impact of Abdominal Liposuction on Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
title_sort impact of abdominal liposuction on abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35832166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748646
work_keys_str_mv AT bondevalinas theimpactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview
AT soteropuloscarole theimpactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview
AT pooresamuelo theimpactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview
AT bondevalinas impactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview
AT soteropuloscarole impactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview
AT pooresamuelo impactofabdominalliposuctiononabdominallybasedautologousbreastreconstructionasystematicreview