Cargando…
Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot
While reaching and grasping are highly prevalent manual actions, neuroimaging studies provide evidence that their neural representations may be shared between different body parts, i.e., effectors. If these actions are guided by effector-independent mechanisms, similar kinematics should be observed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x |
_version_ | 1784715573433729024 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yuqi Caracoglia, James Sen, Sriparna Freud, Erez Striem-Amit, Ella |
author_facet | Liu, Yuqi Caracoglia, James Sen, Sriparna Freud, Erez Striem-Amit, Ella |
author_sort | Liu, Yuqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | While reaching and grasping are highly prevalent manual actions, neuroimaging studies provide evidence that their neural representations may be shared between different body parts, i.e., effectors. If these actions are guided by effector-independent mechanisms, similar kinematics should be observed when the action is performed by the hand or by a cortically remote and less experienced effector, such as the foot. We tested this hypothesis with two characteristic components of action: the initial ballistic stage of reaching, and the preshaping of the digits during grasping based on object size. We examined if these kinematic features reflect effector-independent mechanisms by asking participants to reach toward and to grasp objects of different widths with their hand and foot. First, during both reaching and grasping, the velocity profile up to peak velocity matched between the hand and the foot, indicating a shared ballistic acceleration phase. Second, maximum grip aperture and time of maximum grip aperture of grasping increased with object size for both effectors, indicating encoding of object size during transport. Differences between the hand and foot were found in the deceleration phase and time of maximum grip aperture, likely due to biomechanical differences and the participants’ inexperience with foot actions. These findings provide evidence for effector-independent visuomotor mechanisms of reaching and grasping that generalize across body parts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9142431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91424312022-05-29 Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot Liu, Yuqi Caracoglia, James Sen, Sriparna Freud, Erez Striem-Amit, Ella Exp Brain Res Research Article While reaching and grasping are highly prevalent manual actions, neuroimaging studies provide evidence that their neural representations may be shared between different body parts, i.e., effectors. If these actions are guided by effector-independent mechanisms, similar kinematics should be observed when the action is performed by the hand or by a cortically remote and less experienced effector, such as the foot. We tested this hypothesis with two characteristic components of action: the initial ballistic stage of reaching, and the preshaping of the digits during grasping based on object size. We examined if these kinematic features reflect effector-independent mechanisms by asking participants to reach toward and to grasp objects of different widths with their hand and foot. First, during both reaching and grasping, the velocity profile up to peak velocity matched between the hand and the foot, indicating a shared ballistic acceleration phase. Second, maximum grip aperture and time of maximum grip aperture of grasping increased with object size for both effectors, indicating encoding of object size during transport. Differences between the hand and foot were found in the deceleration phase and time of maximum grip aperture, likely due to biomechanical differences and the participants’ inexperience with foot actions. These findings provide evidence for effector-independent visuomotor mechanisms of reaching and grasping that generalize across body parts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9142431/ /pubmed/35426511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Yuqi Caracoglia, James Sen, Sriparna Freud, Erez Striem-Amit, Ella Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title | Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title_full | Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title_fullStr | Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title_full_unstemmed | Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title_short | Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
title_sort | are reaching and grasping effector-independent? similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyuqi arereachingandgraspingeffectorindependentsimilaritiesanddifferencesinreachingandgraspingkinematicsbetweenthehandandfoot AT caracogliajames arereachingandgraspingeffectorindependentsimilaritiesanddifferencesinreachingandgraspingkinematicsbetweenthehandandfoot AT sensriparna arereachingandgraspingeffectorindependentsimilaritiesanddifferencesinreachingandgraspingkinematicsbetweenthehandandfoot AT freuderez arereachingandgraspingeffectorindependentsimilaritiesanddifferencesinreachingandgraspingkinematicsbetweenthehandandfoot AT striemamitella arereachingandgraspingeffectorindependentsimilaritiesanddifferencesinreachingandgraspingkinematicsbetweenthehandandfoot |