Cargando…
Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x |
_version_ | 1784715603074875392 |
---|---|
author | Ramadan, Hadi Pakrashi, Tarita Thurman, Andrea R. Pomeroy, Kimball O. Celia, Gerard |
author_facet | Ramadan, Hadi Pakrashi, Tarita Thurman, Andrea R. Pomeroy, Kimball O. Celia, Gerard |
author_sort | Ramadan, Hadi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were analyzed at the World Egg Bank. The outcome studied was clinical pregnancy rate. Cycles included only single embryo transfers (ET) without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 600 cycles met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 409 cycles and group 2 had 191 cycles. There was no statistical significance in clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (38.63% vs 32.46%, p = 0.14). Mean embryo age was higher in group 2 (5.1 vs. 5.4 days, p < 0.01). The compounding effect of vitrification when applied to two distinct stages (oocyte and embryo), has not been studied. When comparing the two groups, we found no difference in pregnancy rate. However, there was a trend towards fewer pregnancies in group 2. A larger study should be done to determine the validity of this result (Ramadan et al. in Fertil Steril, 2020). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9142575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91425752022-05-29 Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes Ramadan, Hadi Pakrashi, Tarita Thurman, Andrea R. Pomeroy, Kimball O. Celia, Gerard Sci Rep Article Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were analyzed at the World Egg Bank. The outcome studied was clinical pregnancy rate. Cycles included only single embryo transfers (ET) without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 600 cycles met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 409 cycles and group 2 had 191 cycles. There was no statistical significance in clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (38.63% vs 32.46%, p = 0.14). Mean embryo age was higher in group 2 (5.1 vs. 5.4 days, p < 0.01). The compounding effect of vitrification when applied to two distinct stages (oocyte and embryo), has not been studied. When comparing the two groups, we found no difference in pregnancy rate. However, there was a trend towards fewer pregnancies in group 2. A larger study should be done to determine the validity of this result (Ramadan et al. in Fertil Steril, 2020). Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9142575/ /pubmed/35624188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ramadan, Hadi Pakrashi, Tarita Thurman, Andrea R. Pomeroy, Kimball O. Celia, Gerard Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title | Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title_full | Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title_fullStr | Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title_full_unstemmed | Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title_short | Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes |
title_sort | cryopreservation does not affect the clinical pregnancy rate of blastocysts derived from vitrified oocytes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramadanhadi cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes AT pakrashitarita cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes AT thurmanandrear cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes AT pomeroykimballo cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes AT celiagerard cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes |