Cargando…

Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes

Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadan, Hadi, Pakrashi, Tarita, Thurman, Andrea R., Pomeroy, Kimball O., Celia, Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x
_version_ 1784715603074875392
author Ramadan, Hadi
Pakrashi, Tarita
Thurman, Andrea R.
Pomeroy, Kimball O.
Celia, Gerard
author_facet Ramadan, Hadi
Pakrashi, Tarita
Thurman, Andrea R.
Pomeroy, Kimball O.
Celia, Gerard
author_sort Ramadan, Hadi
collection PubMed
description Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were analyzed at the World Egg Bank. The outcome studied was clinical pregnancy rate. Cycles included only single embryo transfers (ET) without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 600 cycles met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 409 cycles and group 2 had 191 cycles. There was no statistical significance in clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (38.63% vs 32.46%, p = 0.14). Mean embryo age was higher in group 2 (5.1 vs. 5.4 days, p < 0.01). The compounding effect of vitrification when applied to two distinct stages (oocyte and embryo), has not been studied. When comparing the two groups, we found no difference in pregnancy rate. However, there was a trend towards fewer pregnancies in group 2. A larger study should be done to determine the validity of this result (Ramadan et al. in Fertil Steril, 2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9142575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91425752022-05-29 Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes Ramadan, Hadi Pakrashi, Tarita Thurman, Andrea R. Pomeroy, Kimball O. Celia, Gerard Sci Rep Article Vitrified, or “frozen”, donor eggs can either be fertilized and cultured for fresh transfer (group 1), or fertilized and cryopreserved for transfer in a “frozen embryo transfer” cycle (group 2). This study compared the pregnancy rates between the two groups. Frozen donor egg cycles (N = 1213) were analyzed at the World Egg Bank. The outcome studied was clinical pregnancy rate. Cycles included only single embryo transfers (ET) without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 600 cycles met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 409 cycles and group 2 had 191 cycles. There was no statistical significance in clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (38.63% vs 32.46%, p = 0.14). Mean embryo age was higher in group 2 (5.1 vs. 5.4 days, p < 0.01). The compounding effect of vitrification when applied to two distinct stages (oocyte and embryo), has not been studied. When comparing the two groups, we found no difference in pregnancy rate. However, there was a trend towards fewer pregnancies in group 2. A larger study should be done to determine the validity of this result (Ramadan et al. in Fertil Steril, 2020). Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9142575/ /pubmed/35624188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ramadan, Hadi
Pakrashi, Tarita
Thurman, Andrea R.
Pomeroy, Kimball O.
Celia, Gerard
Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title_full Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title_fullStr Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title_full_unstemmed Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title_short Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes
title_sort cryopreservation does not affect the clinical pregnancy rate of blastocysts derived from vitrified oocytes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35624188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12992-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadanhadi cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes
AT pakrashitarita cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes
AT thurmanandrear cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes
AT pomeroykimballo cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes
AT celiagerard cryopreservationdoesnotaffecttheclinicalpregnancyrateofblastocystsderivedfromvitrifiedoocytes