Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh, Saghaei, Behnaz, Shariat, Ardalan, Ingle, Lee, Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh, Shojaei, Masoumeh, Daneshfar, Afkham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672
_version_ 1784715612233138176
author Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh
Saghaei, Behnaz
Shariat, Ardalan
Ingle, Lee
Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh
Shojaei, Masoumeh
Daneshfar, Afkham
author_facet Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh
Saghaei, Behnaz
Shariat, Ardalan
Ingle, Lee
Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh
Shojaei, Masoumeh
Daneshfar, Afkham
author_sort Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′07) were completed by children and their parents. By using 95% confidence intervals, minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated, and concurrent validity was investigated. By applying the MABC-2 test as a reference standard (cut-off fifth centile), sensitivity and specificity were examined. RESULTS: 273 children (mean age: 6.3 ± 2.3 years; 70% male) with and without motor impairment completed the investigation. For test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) was >0.89 for the MABC-2 test. The MDC95 value for the motor skill test was 5.76. There was a significant correlation between the MABC-2 test and DCDQ′07 (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and the Go/No-Go test (r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Overall, the sensitivity was very high (90%), the specificity was low (46%), and positive and negative predictive values were high (69% and 81%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The MABC-2 test can be considered a valid and reliable motor skill assessment tool for children with and without motor impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9142614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91426142022-05-29 Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh Saghaei, Behnaz Shariat, Ardalan Ingle, Lee Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shojaei, Masoumeh Daneshfar, Afkham Ann Med Surg (Lond) Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′07) were completed by children and their parents. By using 95% confidence intervals, minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated, and concurrent validity was investigated. By applying the MABC-2 test as a reference standard (cut-off fifth centile), sensitivity and specificity were examined. RESULTS: 273 children (mean age: 6.3 ± 2.3 years; 70% male) with and without motor impairment completed the investigation. For test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) was >0.89 for the MABC-2 test. The MDC95 value for the motor skill test was 5.76. There was a significant correlation between the MABC-2 test and DCDQ′07 (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and the Go/No-Go test (r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Overall, the sensitivity was very high (90%), the specificity was low (46%), and positive and negative predictive values were high (69% and 81%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The MABC-2 test can be considered a valid and reliable motor skill assessment tool for children with and without motor impairment. Elsevier 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9142614/ /pubmed/35638021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cohort Study
Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh
Saghaei, Behnaz
Shariat, Ardalan
Ingle, Lee
Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh
Shojaei, Masoumeh
Daneshfar, Afkham
Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title_full Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title_short Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
title_sort validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: a prospective cohort study
topic Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672
work_keys_str_mv AT ghayournajafabadimahboubeh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT saghaeibehnaz validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shariatardalan validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT inglelee validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT babazadehzaviehseyedehsaeideh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shojaeimasoumeh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT daneshfarafkham validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy