Cargando…
Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672 |
_version_ | 1784715612233138176 |
---|---|
author | Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh Saghaei, Behnaz Shariat, Ardalan Ingle, Lee Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shojaei, Masoumeh Daneshfar, Afkham |
author_facet | Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh Saghaei, Behnaz Shariat, Ardalan Ingle, Lee Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shojaei, Masoumeh Daneshfar, Afkham |
author_sort | Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′07) were completed by children and their parents. By using 95% confidence intervals, minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated, and concurrent validity was investigated. By applying the MABC-2 test as a reference standard (cut-off fifth centile), sensitivity and specificity were examined. RESULTS: 273 children (mean age: 6.3 ± 2.3 years; 70% male) with and without motor impairment completed the investigation. For test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) was >0.89 for the MABC-2 test. The MDC95 value for the motor skill test was 5.76. There was a significant correlation between the MABC-2 test and DCDQ′07 (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and the Go/No-Go test (r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Overall, the sensitivity was very high (90%), the specificity was low (46%), and positive and negative predictive values were high (69% and 81%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The MABC-2 test can be considered a valid and reliable motor skill assessment tool for children with and without motor impairment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9142614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91426142022-05-29 Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh Saghaei, Behnaz Shariat, Ardalan Ingle, Lee Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shojaei, Masoumeh Daneshfar, Afkham Ann Med Surg (Lond) Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Examining the reliability and validity of the second edition movement assessment battery test (MABC-2) in children with and without motor impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the MABC-2 test and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ′07) were completed by children and their parents. By using 95% confidence intervals, minimal detectable change (MDC95) was calculated, and concurrent validity was investigated. By applying the MABC-2 test as a reference standard (cut-off fifth centile), sensitivity and specificity were examined. RESULTS: 273 children (mean age: 6.3 ± 2.3 years; 70% male) with and without motor impairment completed the investigation. For test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) was >0.89 for the MABC-2 test. The MDC95 value for the motor skill test was 5.76. There was a significant correlation between the MABC-2 test and DCDQ′07 (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and the Go/No-Go test (r = 0.50, P < 0.001). Overall, the sensitivity was very high (90%), the specificity was low (46%), and positive and negative predictive values were high (69% and 81%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The MABC-2 test can be considered a valid and reliable motor skill assessment tool for children with and without motor impairment. Elsevier 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9142614/ /pubmed/35638021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Cohort Study Ghayour Najafabadi, Mahboubeh Saghaei, Behnaz Shariat, Ardalan Ingle, Lee Babazadeh-Zavieh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shojaei, Masoumeh Daneshfar, Afkham Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title | Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title_full | Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title_short | Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: A prospective cohort study |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery second edition test in children with and without motor impairment: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghayournajafabadimahboubeh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT saghaeibehnaz validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT shariatardalan validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT inglelee validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT babazadehzaviehseyedehsaeideh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT shojaeimasoumeh validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy AT daneshfarafkham validityandreliabilityofthemovementassessmentbatterysecondeditiontestinchildrenwithandwithoutmotorimpairmentaprospectivecohortstudy |