Cargando…

Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries

IMPORTANCE: Studies using data from before 2011 concluded that the cost of US cancer care is justified given improved outcomes compared with European countries. However, it is unclear whether contemporary US cancer care provides better value than that of other high-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Ryan D., Bradley, Elizabeth H., Gross, Cary P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229
_version_ 1784715666324979712
author Chow, Ryan D.
Bradley, Elizabeth H.
Gross, Cary P.
author_facet Chow, Ryan D.
Bradley, Elizabeth H.
Gross, Cary P.
author_sort Chow, Ryan D.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Studies using data from before 2011 concluded that the cost of US cancer care is justified given improved outcomes compared with European countries. However, it is unclear whether contemporary US cancer care provides better value than that of other high-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cancer mortality rates in 2020 were lower in countries with higher cancer-related spending, and to estimate across countries the incremental cost per averted cancer death. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, national-level analysis of 22 high-income countries, assessing the association between cancer care expenditures and age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates in 2020, with and without adjustment for smoking. In addition, US incremental costs per averted death compared with the other countries were calculated. This study was conducted from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study of 22 countries, the median cancer mortality rate was 91.4 per 100 000 population (IQR, 84.2-101.6). The US cancer mortality rate was higher than that of 6 other countries (86.3 per 100 000). Median per capita spending in USD for cancer care was $296 (IQR, $222-$348), with the US spending more than any other country ($584). After adjusting for smoking, 9 countries had lower cancer care expenditures and lower mortality rates than the US. Of the remaining 12 countries, the US additionally spent more than $5 million per averted death relative to 4 countries, and between $1 and $5 million per averted death relative to 8 countries. Cancer care expenditures were not associated with cancer mortality rates, with or without adjustment for smoking (Pearson R = −0.05 [95% CI, −0.46 to 0.38]; P = .81; and R = −0.05 [95% CI, −0.46 to 0.38]; P = .82). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of national cancer care expenditures and cancer mortality rates across 22 countries, although the cancer mortality rate in the US was lower than the median, the US spent twice as much on cancer care as the median country. Findings of this study suggest that the US expenditure on cancer care may not be commensurate with improved cancer outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9142870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91428702022-06-10 Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries Chow, Ryan D. Bradley, Elizabeth H. Gross, Cary P. JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Studies using data from before 2011 concluded that the cost of US cancer care is justified given improved outcomes compared with European countries. However, it is unclear whether contemporary US cancer care provides better value than that of other high-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cancer mortality rates in 2020 were lower in countries with higher cancer-related spending, and to estimate across countries the incremental cost per averted cancer death. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, national-level analysis of 22 high-income countries, assessing the association between cancer care expenditures and age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates in 2020, with and without adjustment for smoking. In addition, US incremental costs per averted death compared with the other countries were calculated. This study was conducted from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age-standardized population-level cancer mortality rates. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study of 22 countries, the median cancer mortality rate was 91.4 per 100 000 population (IQR, 84.2-101.6). The US cancer mortality rate was higher than that of 6 other countries (86.3 per 100 000). Median per capita spending in USD for cancer care was $296 (IQR, $222-$348), with the US spending more than any other country ($584). After adjusting for smoking, 9 countries had lower cancer care expenditures and lower mortality rates than the US. Of the remaining 12 countries, the US additionally spent more than $5 million per averted death relative to 4 countries, and between $1 and $5 million per averted death relative to 8 countries. Cancer care expenditures were not associated with cancer mortality rates, with or without adjustment for smoking (Pearson R = −0.05 [95% CI, −0.46 to 0.38]; P = .81; and R = −0.05 [95% CI, −0.46 to 0.38]; P = .82). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of national cancer care expenditures and cancer mortality rates across 22 countries, although the cancer mortality rate in the US was lower than the median, the US spent twice as much on cancer care as the median country. Findings of this study suggest that the US expenditure on cancer care may not be commensurate with improved cancer outcomes. American Medical Association 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9142870/ /pubmed/35977250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229 Text en Copyright 2022 Chow RD et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Chow, Ryan D.
Bradley, Elizabeth H.
Gross, Cary P.
Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title_full Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title_fullStr Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title_short Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries
title_sort comparison of cancer-related spending and mortality rates in the us vs 21 high-income countries
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1229
work_keys_str_mv AT chowryand comparisonofcancerrelatedspendingandmortalityratesintheusvs21highincomecountries
AT bradleyelizabethh comparisonofcancerrelatedspendingandmortalityratesintheusvs21highincomecountries
AT grosscaryp comparisonofcancerrelatedspendingandmortalityratesintheusvs21highincomecountries