Cargando…

Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization

WiFi-based indoor positioning has attracted intensive research activities. While localization accuracy is steadily improving due to the application of advanced algorithms, the factors that affect indoor localization accuracy have not been sufficiently understood. Most localization algorithms used in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shuyu, Welsen, Sherif, Brusic, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103709
_version_ 1784715721462251520
author Li, Shuyu
Welsen, Sherif
Brusic, Vladimir
author_facet Li, Shuyu
Welsen, Sherif
Brusic, Vladimir
author_sort Li, Shuyu
collection PubMed
description WiFi-based indoor positioning has attracted intensive research activities. While localization accuracy is steadily improving due to the application of advanced algorithms, the factors that affect indoor localization accuracy have not been sufficiently understood. Most localization algorithms used in changing indoor spaces are Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) based, and they deploy the conventional MUSIC algorithm. The localization accuracy can be achieved by algorithm improvements or joint localization that deploys multiple Access Points (APs). We performed an experiment that assessed the Test Point (TP) accuracy and distribution of results in a complex environment. The testing space was a 290 m [Formula: see text] three-room environment with three APs with 38 TPs. The joint localization using three APs was performed in the same test space. We developed and implemented a new algorithm for improved accuracy of joint localization. We analyzed the statistical characteristics of the results based on each TP and show that the local space-dependent factors are the key factors for localization accuracy. The most important factors that cause errors are distance, obstacles, corner locations, the location of APs, and the angular orientation of the antenna array. Compared with the well-known SpotFi algorithm, we achieved a mean accuracy (across all TPs) improvement of 46%. The unbiased joint localization median accuracy improved by 20% as compared to the best individual localization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9143096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91430962022-05-29 Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization Li, Shuyu Welsen, Sherif Brusic, Vladimir Sensors (Basel) Article WiFi-based indoor positioning has attracted intensive research activities. While localization accuracy is steadily improving due to the application of advanced algorithms, the factors that affect indoor localization accuracy have not been sufficiently understood. Most localization algorithms used in changing indoor spaces are Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) based, and they deploy the conventional MUSIC algorithm. The localization accuracy can be achieved by algorithm improvements or joint localization that deploys multiple Access Points (APs). We performed an experiment that assessed the Test Point (TP) accuracy and distribution of results in a complex environment. The testing space was a 290 m [Formula: see text] three-room environment with three APs with 38 TPs. The joint localization using three APs was performed in the same test space. We developed and implemented a new algorithm for improved accuracy of joint localization. We analyzed the statistical characteristics of the results based on each TP and show that the local space-dependent factors are the key factors for localization accuracy. The most important factors that cause errors are distance, obstacles, corner locations, the location of APs, and the angular orientation of the antenna array. Compared with the well-known SpotFi algorithm, we achieved a mean accuracy (across all TPs) improvement of 46%. The unbiased joint localization median accuracy improved by 20% as compared to the best individual localization. MDPI 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9143096/ /pubmed/35632118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103709 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Shuyu
Welsen, Sherif
Brusic, Vladimir
Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title_full Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title_fullStr Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title_full_unstemmed Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title_short Multi-AP and Test Point Accuracy of the Results in WiFi Indoor Localization
title_sort multi-ap and test point accuracy of the results in wifi indoor localization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22103709
work_keys_str_mv AT lishuyu multiapandtestpointaccuracyoftheresultsinwifiindoorlocalization
AT welsensherif multiapandtestpointaccuracyoftheresultsinwifiindoorlocalization
AT brusicvladimir multiapandtestpointaccuracyoftheresultsinwifiindoorlocalization