Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) in Latvia from the population-based cross-sectional study performed in 2019–2020 and to compare the results with a similar study done in 2009–2010. Materials and Methods: The target sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erglis, Andrejs, Bajare, Iveta, Jegere, Sanda, Mintale, Iveta, Barzdins, Juris, Luguzis, Artis, Apinis, Peteris, Caksa, Anda, Gavare, Iveta, Dzerve, Vilnis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050643
_version_ 1784715750336888832
author Erglis, Andrejs
Bajare, Iveta
Jegere, Sanda
Mintale, Iveta
Barzdins, Juris
Luguzis, Artis
Apinis, Peteris
Caksa, Anda
Gavare, Iveta
Dzerve, Vilnis
author_facet Erglis, Andrejs
Bajare, Iveta
Jegere, Sanda
Mintale, Iveta
Barzdins, Juris
Luguzis, Artis
Apinis, Peteris
Caksa, Anda
Gavare, Iveta
Dzerve, Vilnis
author_sort Erglis, Andrejs
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) in Latvia from the population-based cross-sectional study performed in 2019–2020 and to compare the results with a similar study done in 2009–2010. Materials and Methods: The target sample of 6000 individuals representing a cross-section of Latvia’s inhabitants (aged 25–74) was formed using stratified two-stage cluster sampling. The survey had two components: (1) an interview using a pre-specified questionnaire and (2) physical examination (height, weight, arterial pressure) and collection of venous blood samples to measure levels of fasting glucose (Glu), total cholesterol (TC), high and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C/LDL-C), and triglycerides (Tg). In total, 4070 individuals were interviewed (32% non-response), from which 2218 (55%) individuals underwent physical examination and collection of blood samples. Results: The most frequently observed RFs were high LDL-C (62.0%), smoking (45.3%), and arterial hypertension (36.8%), while the prevalence of self-reported high cholesterol and hypertension was 19.3 and 18.6%, respectively. A decrease in the prevalence of hypertension, high LDL-C, and Glu was noted. Smoking decreased in younger men. The mean number of five most important cardiovascular RFs was 2.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0, 2.1); 2.3 (95% CI 2.2, 2.4) for men and 1.8 (95% CI 1.7, 19) for women. The average number of RFs has decreased by 0.3 in 10 years, t(5883) = −7.2, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of cardiovascular RFs remains noteworthy, an improvement in the risk profile of the Latvian population has been observed over the past decade. The study shows subjective self-underestimation of cardiovascular risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9143214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91432142022-05-29 Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia Erglis, Andrejs Bajare, Iveta Jegere, Sanda Mintale, Iveta Barzdins, Juris Luguzis, Artis Apinis, Peteris Caksa, Anda Gavare, Iveta Dzerve, Vilnis Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) in Latvia from the population-based cross-sectional study performed in 2019–2020 and to compare the results with a similar study done in 2009–2010. Materials and Methods: The target sample of 6000 individuals representing a cross-section of Latvia’s inhabitants (aged 25–74) was formed using stratified two-stage cluster sampling. The survey had two components: (1) an interview using a pre-specified questionnaire and (2) physical examination (height, weight, arterial pressure) and collection of venous blood samples to measure levels of fasting glucose (Glu), total cholesterol (TC), high and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C/LDL-C), and triglycerides (Tg). In total, 4070 individuals were interviewed (32% non-response), from which 2218 (55%) individuals underwent physical examination and collection of blood samples. Results: The most frequently observed RFs were high LDL-C (62.0%), smoking (45.3%), and arterial hypertension (36.8%), while the prevalence of self-reported high cholesterol and hypertension was 19.3 and 18.6%, respectively. A decrease in the prevalence of hypertension, high LDL-C, and Glu was noted. Smoking decreased in younger men. The mean number of five most important cardiovascular RFs was 2.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0, 2.1); 2.3 (95% CI 2.2, 2.4) for men and 1.8 (95% CI 1.7, 19) for women. The average number of RFs has decreased by 0.3 in 10 years, t(5883) = −7.2, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of cardiovascular RFs remains noteworthy, an improvement in the risk profile of the Latvian population has been observed over the past decade. The study shows subjective self-underestimation of cardiovascular risk. MDPI 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9143214/ /pubmed/35630060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050643 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Erglis, Andrejs
Bajare, Iveta
Jegere, Sanda
Mintale, Iveta
Barzdins, Juris
Luguzis, Artis
Apinis, Peteris
Caksa, Anda
Gavare, Iveta
Dzerve, Vilnis
Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Most Important Cardiovascular Risk Factors Based on Cross-Sectional Studies in the Population of Latvia
title_sort comparative analysis of the most important cardiovascular risk factors based on cross-sectional studies in the population of latvia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35630060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050643
work_keys_str_mv AT erglisandrejs comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT bajareiveta comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT jegeresanda comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT mintaleiveta comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT barzdinsjuris comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT luguzisartis comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT apinispeteris comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT caksaanda comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT gavareiveta comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia
AT dzervevilnis comparativeanalysisofthemostimportantcardiovascularriskfactorsbasedoncrosssectionalstudiesinthepopulationoflatvia