Cargando…

Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining

The use of massive bone allografts after the resection of bone tumours is still a challenging process. However, to overcome some issues related to the processing procedures and guarantee the best three-dimensional matching between donor and recipient, some tissue banks have developed a virtual tissu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vivarelli, Leonardo, Govoni, Marco, Attala, Dario, Zoccali, Carmine, Biagini, Roberto, Dallari, Dante
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102781
_version_ 1784715799061069824
author Vivarelli, Leonardo
Govoni, Marco
Attala, Dario
Zoccali, Carmine
Biagini, Roberto
Dallari, Dante
author_facet Vivarelli, Leonardo
Govoni, Marco
Attala, Dario
Zoccali, Carmine
Biagini, Roberto
Dallari, Dante
author_sort Vivarelli, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description The use of massive bone allografts after the resection of bone tumours is still a challenging process. However, to overcome some issues related to the processing procedures and guarantee the best three-dimensional matching between donor and recipient, some tissue banks have developed a virtual tissue database based on the scanning of the available allografts for using their 3D shape during virtual surgical planning (VSP) procedures. To promote the use of future VSP bone-shaping protocols useful for machining applications within a cleanroom environment, in our work, we simulate a massive bone allograft machining with two different machines: a four-axes (computer numerical control, CNC) vs. a five-axes (robot) milling machine. The allograft design was based on a real case of allograft reconstruction after pelvic tumour resection and obtained with 3D Slicer and Rhinoceros software. Machining simulations were performed with RhinoCAM and graphically and mathematically analysed with CloudCompare and R, respectively. In this case, the geometrical differences of the allograft design are not clinically relevant; however, the mathematical analysis showed that the robot performed better than the four-axes machine. The proof-of-concept presented here paves the way towards massive bone allograft cleanroom machining. Nevertheless, further studies, such as the simulation of different types of allografts and real machining on massive bone allografts, are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9143408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91434082022-05-29 Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining Vivarelli, Leonardo Govoni, Marco Attala, Dario Zoccali, Carmine Biagini, Roberto Dallari, Dante J Clin Med Article The use of massive bone allografts after the resection of bone tumours is still a challenging process. However, to overcome some issues related to the processing procedures and guarantee the best three-dimensional matching between donor and recipient, some tissue banks have developed a virtual tissue database based on the scanning of the available allografts for using their 3D shape during virtual surgical planning (VSP) procedures. To promote the use of future VSP bone-shaping protocols useful for machining applications within a cleanroom environment, in our work, we simulate a massive bone allograft machining with two different machines: a four-axes (computer numerical control, CNC) vs. a five-axes (robot) milling machine. The allograft design was based on a real case of allograft reconstruction after pelvic tumour resection and obtained with 3D Slicer and Rhinoceros software. Machining simulations were performed with RhinoCAM and graphically and mathematically analysed with CloudCompare and R, respectively. In this case, the geometrical differences of the allograft design are not clinically relevant; however, the mathematical analysis showed that the robot performed better than the four-axes machine. The proof-of-concept presented here paves the way towards massive bone allograft cleanroom machining. Nevertheless, further studies, such as the simulation of different types of allografts and real machining on massive bone allografts, are needed. MDPI 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9143408/ /pubmed/35628908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102781 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vivarelli, Leonardo
Govoni, Marco
Attala, Dario
Zoccali, Carmine
Biagini, Roberto
Dallari, Dante
Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title_full Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title_fullStr Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title_full_unstemmed Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title_short Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining
title_sort custom massive allograft in a case of pelvic bone tumour: simulation of processing with computerised numerical control vs. robotic machining
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35628908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102781
work_keys_str_mv AT vivarellileonardo custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining
AT govonimarco custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining
AT attaladario custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining
AT zoccalicarmine custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining
AT biaginiroberto custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining
AT dallaridante custommassiveallograftinacaseofpelvicbonetumoursimulationofprocessingwithcomputerisednumericalcontrolvsroboticmachining