Cargando…
Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826 |
_version_ | 1784715867092680704 |
---|---|
author | Berkhout, Christophe De Man, Jeroen Collins, Claire Willefert-Bouche, Amy Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna Badelon, Margot Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul |
author_facet | Berkhout, Christophe De Man, Jeroen Collins, Claire Willefert-Bouche, Amy Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna Badelon, Margot Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul |
author_sort | Berkhout, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased in both arms of the study. In 2019, we deepened the investigations explaining the increased uptake conducting a registry-based 4/2/1 cluster RCT designed by Zelen with two extra years of follow-up of the study cohort. The study population included 23,024 patients eligible to be vaccinated who were registered with 175 GPs. The main outcome remained the number of vaccination units delivered per study group. Data were extracted from the SNIIRAM warehouse claim database for the Lille-Douai district (northern France). No difference in vaccination uptake was found in the Zelen versus the control group of the initial RCT. Overall, the proportion of vaccinated patients increased in the cohort from 51.4% to 70.4% over the three years. Being vaccinated the previous year was a strong predictor of being vaccinated in a subsequent year. The increase in vaccination uptake, especially among people older than 65, can be explained by a cohort effect. Health promotion and the promotion of primary health care may play an important role in this increase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9143687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91436872022-05-29 Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design Berkhout, Christophe De Man, Jeroen Collins, Claire Willefert-Bouche, Amy Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna Badelon, Margot Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul Vaccines (Basel) Article In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased in both arms of the study. In 2019, we deepened the investigations explaining the increased uptake conducting a registry-based 4/2/1 cluster RCT designed by Zelen with two extra years of follow-up of the study cohort. The study population included 23,024 patients eligible to be vaccinated who were registered with 175 GPs. The main outcome remained the number of vaccination units delivered per study group. Data were extracted from the SNIIRAM warehouse claim database for the Lille-Douai district (northern France). No difference in vaccination uptake was found in the Zelen versus the control group of the initial RCT. Overall, the proportion of vaccinated patients increased in the cohort from 51.4% to 70.4% over the three years. Being vaccinated the previous year was a strong predictor of being vaccinated in a subsequent year. The increase in vaccination uptake, especially among people older than 65, can be explained by a cohort effect. Health promotion and the promotion of primary health care may play an important role in this increase. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9143687/ /pubmed/35632583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Berkhout, Christophe De Man, Jeroen Collins, Claire Willefert-Bouche, Amy Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna Badelon, Margot Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title | Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title_full | Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title_fullStr | Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title_short | Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design |
title_sort | reanalysis of a randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms: a zelen design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berkhoutchristophe reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT demanjeroen reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT collinsclaire reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT willefertboucheamy reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT zgorskamaynardmoussasuzanna reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT badelonmargot reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT peremanslieve reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign AT vanroyenpaul reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign |