Cargando…

Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design

In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berkhout, Christophe, De Man, Jeroen, Collins, Claire, Willefert-Bouche, Amy, Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna, Badelon, Margot, Peremans, Lieve, Van Royen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826
_version_ 1784715867092680704
author Berkhout, Christophe
De Man, Jeroen
Collins, Claire
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna
Badelon, Margot
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
author_facet Berkhout, Christophe
De Man, Jeroen
Collins, Claire
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna
Badelon, Margot
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
author_sort Berkhout, Christophe
collection PubMed
description In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased in both arms of the study. In 2019, we deepened the investigations explaining the increased uptake conducting a registry-based 4/2/1 cluster RCT designed by Zelen with two extra years of follow-up of the study cohort. The study population included 23,024 patients eligible to be vaccinated who were registered with 175 GPs. The main outcome remained the number of vaccination units delivered per study group. Data were extracted from the SNIIRAM warehouse claim database for the Lille-Douai district (northern France). No difference in vaccination uptake was found in the Zelen versus the control group of the initial RCT. Overall, the proportion of vaccinated patients increased in the cohort from 51.4% to 70.4% over the three years. Being vaccinated the previous year was a strong predictor of being vaccinated in a subsequent year. The increase in vaccination uptake, especially among people older than 65, can be explained by a cohort effect. Health promotion and the promotion of primary health care may play an important role in this increase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9143687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91436872022-05-29 Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design Berkhout, Christophe De Man, Jeroen Collins, Claire Willefert-Bouche, Amy Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna Badelon, Margot Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul Vaccines (Basel) Article In 2014–2015, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in general practitioner (GP) waiting rooms. No effect of the intervention could be demonstrated, but the immunization uptake increased in both arms of the study. In 2019, we deepened the investigations explaining the increased uptake conducting a registry-based 4/2/1 cluster RCT designed by Zelen with two extra years of follow-up of the study cohort. The study population included 23,024 patients eligible to be vaccinated who were registered with 175 GPs. The main outcome remained the number of vaccination units delivered per study group. Data were extracted from the SNIIRAM warehouse claim database for the Lille-Douai district (northern France). No difference in vaccination uptake was found in the Zelen versus the control group of the initial RCT. Overall, the proportion of vaccinated patients increased in the cohort from 51.4% to 70.4% over the three years. Being vaccinated the previous year was a strong predictor of being vaccinated in a subsequent year. The increase in vaccination uptake, especially among people older than 65, can be explained by a cohort effect. Health promotion and the promotion of primary health care may play an important role in this increase. MDPI 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9143687/ /pubmed/35632583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Berkhout, Christophe
De Man, Jeroen
Collins, Claire
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Zgorska-Maynard Moussa, Suzanna
Badelon, Margot
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title_full Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title_fullStr Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title_short Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Promoting Influenza Vaccination in General Practice Waiting Rooms: A Zelen Design
title_sort reanalysis of a randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms: a zelen design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35632583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050826
work_keys_str_mv AT berkhoutchristophe reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT demanjeroen reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT collinsclaire reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT willefertboucheamy reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT zgorskamaynardmoussasuzanna reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT badelonmargot reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT peremanslieve reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign
AT vanroyenpaul reanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonpromotinginfluenzavaccinationingeneralpracticewaitingroomsazelendesign