Cargando…

IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making

During the past few decades, the science of toxicology has been undergoing a transformation from observational to predictive science. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro assays, in silico models, read-across, and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), are being developed to red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Xiaoqing, Tan, Yu-Mei, Allen, David G., Bell, Shannon, Brown, Paul C., Browning, Lauren, Ceger, Patricia, Gearhart, Jeffery, Hakkinen, Pertti J., Kabadi, Shruti V., Kleinstreuer, Nicole C., Lumen, Annie, Matheson, Joanna, Paini, Alicia, Pangburn, Heather A., Petersen, Elijah J., Reinke, Emily N., Ribeiro, Alexandre J. S., Sipes, Nisha, Sweeney, Lisa M., Wambaugh, John F., Wange, Ronald, Wetmore, Barbara A., Mumtaz, Moiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10050232
_version_ 1784715876167057408
author Chang, Xiaoqing
Tan, Yu-Mei
Allen, David G.
Bell, Shannon
Brown, Paul C.
Browning, Lauren
Ceger, Patricia
Gearhart, Jeffery
Hakkinen, Pertti J.
Kabadi, Shruti V.
Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.
Lumen, Annie
Matheson, Joanna
Paini, Alicia
Pangburn, Heather A.
Petersen, Elijah J.
Reinke, Emily N.
Ribeiro, Alexandre J. S.
Sipes, Nisha
Sweeney, Lisa M.
Wambaugh, John F.
Wange, Ronald
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Mumtaz, Moiz
author_facet Chang, Xiaoqing
Tan, Yu-Mei
Allen, David G.
Bell, Shannon
Brown, Paul C.
Browning, Lauren
Ceger, Patricia
Gearhart, Jeffery
Hakkinen, Pertti J.
Kabadi, Shruti V.
Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.
Lumen, Annie
Matheson, Joanna
Paini, Alicia
Pangburn, Heather A.
Petersen, Elijah J.
Reinke, Emily N.
Ribeiro, Alexandre J. S.
Sipes, Nisha
Sweeney, Lisa M.
Wambaugh, John F.
Wange, Ronald
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Mumtaz, Moiz
author_sort Chang, Xiaoqing
collection PubMed
description During the past few decades, the science of toxicology has been undergoing a transformation from observational to predictive science. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro assays, in silico models, read-across, and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), are being developed to reduce, refine, or replace whole animal testing, encouraging the judicious use of time and resources. Some of these methods have advanced past the exploratory research stage and are beginning to gain acceptance for the risk assessment of chemicals. A review of the recent literature reveals a burst of IVIVE publications over the past decade. In this review, we propose operational definitions for IVIVE, present literature examples for several common toxicity endpoints, and highlight their implications in decision-making processes across various federal agencies, as well as international organizations, including those in the European Union (EU). The current challenges and future needs are also summarized for IVIVE. In addition to refining and reducing the number of animals in traditional toxicity testing protocols and being used for prioritizing chemical testing, the goal to use IVIVE to facilitate the replacement of animal models can be achieved through their continued evolution and development, including a strategic plan to qualify IVIVE methods for regulatory acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9143724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91437242022-05-29 IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making Chang, Xiaoqing Tan, Yu-Mei Allen, David G. Bell, Shannon Brown, Paul C. Browning, Lauren Ceger, Patricia Gearhart, Jeffery Hakkinen, Pertti J. Kabadi, Shruti V. Kleinstreuer, Nicole C. Lumen, Annie Matheson, Joanna Paini, Alicia Pangburn, Heather A. Petersen, Elijah J. Reinke, Emily N. Ribeiro, Alexandre J. S. Sipes, Nisha Sweeney, Lisa M. Wambaugh, John F. Wange, Ronald Wetmore, Barbara A. Mumtaz, Moiz Toxics Review During the past few decades, the science of toxicology has been undergoing a transformation from observational to predictive science. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including in vitro assays, in silico models, read-across, and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), are being developed to reduce, refine, or replace whole animal testing, encouraging the judicious use of time and resources. Some of these methods have advanced past the exploratory research stage and are beginning to gain acceptance for the risk assessment of chemicals. A review of the recent literature reveals a burst of IVIVE publications over the past decade. In this review, we propose operational definitions for IVIVE, present literature examples for several common toxicity endpoints, and highlight their implications in decision-making processes across various federal agencies, as well as international organizations, including those in the European Union (EU). The current challenges and future needs are also summarized for IVIVE. In addition to refining and reducing the number of animals in traditional toxicity testing protocols and being used for prioritizing chemical testing, the goal to use IVIVE to facilitate the replacement of animal models can be achieved through their continued evolution and development, including a strategic plan to qualify IVIVE methods for regulatory acceptance. MDPI 2022-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9143724/ /pubmed/35622645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10050232 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chang, Xiaoqing
Tan, Yu-Mei
Allen, David G.
Bell, Shannon
Brown, Paul C.
Browning, Lauren
Ceger, Patricia
Gearhart, Jeffery
Hakkinen, Pertti J.
Kabadi, Shruti V.
Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.
Lumen, Annie
Matheson, Joanna
Paini, Alicia
Pangburn, Heather A.
Petersen, Elijah J.
Reinke, Emily N.
Ribeiro, Alexandre J. S.
Sipes, Nisha
Sweeney, Lisa M.
Wambaugh, John F.
Wange, Ronald
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Mumtaz, Moiz
IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title_full IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title_fullStr IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title_short IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making
title_sort ivive: facilitating the use of in vitro toxicity data in risk assessment and decision making
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10050232
work_keys_str_mv AT changxiaoqing ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT tanyumei ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT allendavidg ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT bellshannon ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT brownpaulc ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT browninglauren ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT cegerpatricia ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT gearhartjeffery ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT hakkinenperttij ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT kabadishrutiv ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT kleinstreuernicolec ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT lumenannie ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT mathesonjoanna ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT painialicia ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT pangburnheathera ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT petersenelijahj ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT reinkeemilyn ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT ribeiroalexandrejs ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT sipesnisha ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT sweeneylisam ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT wambaughjohnf ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT wangeronald ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT wetmorebarbaraa ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking
AT mumtazmoiz ivivefacilitatingtheuseofinvitrotoxicitydatainriskassessmentanddecisionmaking